What's new

Islamabad looks to India to aid economy - FT

Andross

BANNED
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
-12
By James Lamont and Farhan Bokhari in Lahore


Fears over Pakistan’s struggling economy have persuaded the country’s leadership to take steps to gain greater access to the neighbouring, fast-growing Indian market.

A proposal to grant Most Favoured Nation status to India – 15 years after New Delhi accorded the same to Islamabad – and the easing of visa restrictions are the latest steps towards a long-awaited trade liberalisation between the two nuclear-armed rivals.


Pakistan’s military commanders and business community are increasingly worried about the poor performance of the economy under the rule of President Asif Ali Zardari. The fiscal deficit has widened, security threats have chased away investors and mounting debts have forced an energy crisis on the nation.

Economic growth, buoyed by the rural economy, textile exports and remittances, has slipped to about 3 per cent this year. Earlier this month, the central bank resorted to emergency measures to spur industrial development and boost demand ahead of likely parliamentary elections next year by cutting benchmark lending rates by 150 basis points.

Sakib Sherani, a leading economist, describes the economy as “going into a freefall towards a big macroeconomic crisis.”

Just over the border, India’s economy is growing at about 8 per cent a year. The difference has been clocked in Islamabad. Senior ministers say that there is no reason why Pakistan, which had a higher rate of growth than India in the 1980s, should not grow at the same pace as the rest of the region.

The answer, according to Pakistan’s economic planners, is to improve market access with trading partners. Pakistan has gained preferential market access to the European Union, is negotiating a bilateral trade agreement with the Gulf Co-operation Council and has already taken the bold step of agreeing a free-trade agreement with China.

“There’s one thing the US and the rest of the world can do and that is give us market access which is preferential. We feel that for all the sacrifices we have made [in the fight against terrorism] this is the only right that we have,” says Hina Rabbani Khar, the foreign minister.

Ideological obstacles have long prevented greater integration with arch-rival India in spite of shared language and customs. Since the end of British rule 64 years ago, Islamabad has traditionally “punished” New Delhi by withholding trade and complains that India maintains formidable non tariff-barriers.

Some leading Pakistani industrialists see benefits for sectors such as engineering, textiles and agricultural output if links are boosted. Others are less convinced. The Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association has warned that opening up to Indian companies such as Ranbaxy, Dr Reddy’s and Cipla would be suicidal for the local industry.

Khwaja Muhammad Asad, the head of the industry group, said Pakistan should follow Bangladesh’s example by keeping out Indian drugs. “It is not possible for the local industry to compete with a global player, and it will make survival of the industry difficult,” he said in a letter to the ministry of commerce.

Some Islamabad-based diplomats are enthused by the trade developments, viewing them as turning a corner in the hostile relations between India and Pakistan. They were struck that Islamabad signalled a promise of better trade terms only days after New Delhi had formalised a strategic partnership with Kabul, an agreement distrusted by Pakistan’s security establishment.

“It’s more crucial for Pakistan than it is for [fast-growing] India,” said one western diplomat. “It could have a profound impact on the way the country feels about itself. The logic until now has been a very security aware, zero-sum game.”

Hasan Askari Rizvi, Lahore-based military historian, said: “The army has probably concluded that they can’t fight on every front. There are too many fronts. But their decision to accept an MFN status for India is probably also because they feel that this does not compromise Pakistan’s most vital interests.”

Other international partners, however, are less optimistic. They view the progress in talks between Pakistan and India as still “glacial” and say that a lasting peace will only be reached if the two sides reach a compromise over the disputed territory of Kashmir.



Islamabad looks to India to aid economy - FT.com
 

Hasan Askari Rizvi, Lahore-based military historian, said: “The army has probably concluded that they can’t fight on every front. There are too many fronts. But their decision to accept an MFN status for India is probably also because they feel that this does not compromise Pakistan’s most vital interests.”


this is the key point here which should be highlighted in bold.

it doesn't mean Pakistan is ''looking for aid'' from india as if to say we need india's door open to have a prosperous economy; do remember that in the early 2000s we were growing at close to 7.4% of GDP per annum --and none of that entailed any (formal) trade of any significance with the neighbour

i do agree that free and fair bilateral trade in certain sectors can benefit both countries, without compromising our national security interests
 
this is the key point here which should be highlighted in bold.

it doesn't mean Pakistan is ''looking for aid'' from india as if to say we need india's door open to have a prosperous economy; do remember that in the early 2000s we were growing at close to 7.4% of GDP per annum --and none of that entailed any (formal) trade of any significance with the neighbour

i do agree that free and fair bilateral trade in certain sectors can benefit both countries, without compromising our national security interests


Most of our direct trade gets done in Dubai instead of Karachi or Mumbai this drives up cost of all parties concerned.
 
finincial times is vertibal arm of the newyork times.y will pakistan want india to aid economy????saudi arabia is there china is there turkey is there who got booming economy which india cant match.just disinformation spreading by the FT anyways capitalism is in its death bed and india follows the same rules who ruined europe and america so y will pakistan want to commit economical suicide by askin a foe like india who get more aid from US then pakistan itself
 
finincial times is vertibal arm of the newyork times.y will pakistan want india to aid economy????saudi arabia is there china is there turkey is there who got booming economy which india cant match.just disinformation spreading by the FT anyways capitalism is in its death bed and india follows the same rules who ruined europe and america so y will pakistan want to commit economical suicide by askin a foe like india who get more aid from US then pakistan itself



You have no idea what you are talking about :disagree:
 
finincial times is vertibal arm of the newyork times.y will pakistan want india to aid economy????saudi arabia is there china is there turkey is there who got booming economy which india cant match.just disinformation spreading by the FT anyways capitalism is in its death bed and india follows the same rules who ruined europe and america so y will pakistan want to commit economical suicide by askin a foe like india who get more aid from US then pakistan itself

One advice for u- READ THE F*CKING ARTICLE !!
 
Even China is India'a key enemy...it is not stopping them to increase their trade..resulting into higher GDP growth...I think Pak should also pursue the same policy...trade at one side and differences at other...may be what talks and wars didnt solve in last fifty years, economic relations might solve it...
 
Indo China trade is close to $100 billion. These 2 giants have respective GDP of $1.7 trillion & $6 trillon.

Indo Pak trade $1billion pak GDP is $175 BILLION

Euro zone Japan & usa are all over trying to take the gowing indian pie.

Pakistan is next door their hatred and pride as the left them way behind
 
finincial times is vertibal arm of the newyork times.y will pakistan want india to aid economy????saudi arabia is there china is there turkey is there who got booming economy which india cant match.just disinformation spreading by the FT anyways capitalism is in its death bed and india follows the same rules who ruined europe and america so y will pakistan want to commit economical suicide by askin a foe like india who get more aid from US then pakistan itself

one take you head our of you as$ and read the article.
now read it again, as you seem to be a bit weak in the English language:).
 
there is a parallel thread going on about ZeeTV investing in PTV, Pakistan providing MFN status to India, India deciding to help Pakistan in WTO to get access to EU markets... sounds like common sense is prevailing at last between both the countries. Problems are going to be there... it's not going to be resolved overnight! why waste time in dwelling on those issues when you know there is no quick fix... let's make most of what we can & everything else will fall into places in a later date!!
 
On the contrary , Pakistani market is raw for investment and if Pakistan opens doors it will open doors for commerce for Businessman form India , and traditionally the people of two nation do get along if it was not for that 1 issue that keeps dragging our nations backward

Other then that people have been trying hard to have 100% channel with India not necessarily on current events but there were peace efforts even before but we have reached a mile stone in recent years (if it was not for that rouge attack by some lunatics)

It really does makes sense for investment from India into Pakistan - any logical business man would argue that if that were to happen it would yield benefit to region and general growth of culture in both countries

Considering both nations are nuclear states , war will not solve anything - and also Shoaibs book will create more controversey but MFN and sincere effort on both nations will result in alot of positive
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom