What's new

Is "Akhand Bharat" ( Greater India ) a legit ideological goal ?

Mindset of a common Indian is to have peace with Pakistan. Most of them don't know much about Pakistan and are way too busy with life to think of Akhand Bharat other than very few ultra nationalists. And then there are some people who think Atif Aslam is Indian because he used to sing in bollywood songs which shows that some actually don't know about Pakistan at all. But as internet is on rise people are getting more and more aware though.

Overall in short, no.
 
. .
Akhand Bharat is a Demographic Disaster for present day India.

In other words,Thank you Jinnah and Congress for partition.
 
.
It seems from reading this thread that a great many Bharatis do not actively seek to restablish Akhand Bharat...which is good news for Afghans, Pakistanis, Nepalese, Bengladeshis and even Burmese. However what is your response to those who currently have power in Bharat? The RSS idealogues behind Modi and Co? From my understanding they are very keen on Akhand Bharat?

Also I have watched documentaries on RT (don't know how accurate it was) about RSS type organisations teaching children that the map of Bharat is from Afghanistan to Burma and one day this will come to be.
 
.
TMA,

it is all posturing. why wud RSS be interested in akhand bharat- ? In akhand bharat secular folks wud be in a near majority and communals wud be substantially less numerous. BJP wud lose all elections.

Regards
I don't know why would they be interested. That is why I was asking. Perhaps it may be a core eschatological belief for them?

On head to head Ram Madhav who is the general secretary (I think) of an important party in Bharat has a belief of Akhand Bharat. Maybe he does not realize the electoral implications of his voicing his opinion?
 
.
Hi all,
I was wondering about how much seriousness there is in the Hindu/Indian political and social circles to materialize the goal of a greater India comprising Pakistan,India and Bangladesh.
Is this whole idea even considered a legitimate ideological and political goal among the masses for which they must aspire,desire,pray and strive towards or is it just an over blown ambition of an extremist few ?
What about the modern Indian mindset ? Is this idea of any importance or is it considered a whimsical ambition of a crazy people of ancient mind set ?
It would be interesting to know.
We are interested in only land which is occupied by muslim invaders. And we want to liberate it from current day pakistanis who are descends of those barbaric muslim invaders. And the argument pakistanis are native people is false as 99% pakistanis in this forum claim Arab and turk ancestry.
 
.
Hi all,
I was wondering about how much seriousness there is in the Hindu/Indian political and social circles to materialize the goal of a greater India comprising Pakistan,India and Bangladesh.
Is this whole idea even considered a legitimate ideological and political goal among the masses for which they must aspire,desire,pray and strive towards or is it just an over blown ambition of an extremist few ?
What about the modern Indian mindset ? Is this idea of any importance or is it considered a whimsical ambition of a crazy people of ancient mind set ?
It would be interesting to know.

Some people expressed their views .Because they have freedom of expression i this democratic nation.But it is upto us to decide whether that is allowable or not .
And I am saying majority of Indians including me wont allow that .Irrespective of our religion we Indians wouldnt allow some other nations to grab our hard earned economic achievements.India is only for Indians and always will be.

It seems from reading this thread that a great many Bharatis do not actively seek to restablish Akhand Bharat...which is good news for Afghans, Pakistanis, Nepalese, Bengladeshis and even Burmese. However what is your response to those who currently have power in Bharat? The RSS idealogues behind Modi and Co? From my understanding they are very keen on Akhand Bharat?

Also I have watched documentaries on RT (don't know how accurate it was) about RSS type organisations teaching children that the map of Bharat is from Afghanistan to Burma and one day this will come to be.

I have been also in RSS.Trust me we Indians wont accept some idiotic suggestions of a religious head .We are always rationalists and always will be.
 
.
one must be mad to think to unite Pakistan and BD with India.let me and my next generations live in peace.
 
.
Hi all,
I was wondering about how much seriousness there is in the Hindu/Indian political and social circles to materialize the goal of a greater India comprising Pakistan,India and Bangladesh.
Is this whole idea even considered a legitimate ideological and political goal among the masses for which they must aspire,desire,pray and strive towards or is it just an over blown ambition of an extremist few ?
What about the modern Indian mindset ? Is this idea of any importance or is it considered a whimsical ambition of a crazy people of ancient mind set ?
It would be interesting to know.

ABT,

It is just a polemic among Sanghis. No one wants it least of course the chaddis themselves.

Regards

i support a union of all south asian countries with afghanistan, pakistani, india and bangladesh to begin with... the governance should be guided by socialism with the exact political system being the "third universal theory" ( jamahiriya )[1][2][3] from libya.

i have always wanted this union, even without speaking of jamahiriya... however, gaddafi says the below in his essay "kashmir : the definitive solution"[4], and in another essay he has called this union "greater india" but naming is of course to be decided later with the primary thing being talking of union... my preferred name is "union of socialist south asia"...
The map of the world will soon contain nothing but giant entities. Nation-states will disappear, in view of the fact that they are no longer capable to face the challenges of globalization. Therefore, the independence of Kashmir will not cause dreaded shockwaves it would have caused before the age of globalization. Kashmir, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Sri Lanka and India will all be subsumed in a future giant entity of the Indian subcontinent along the lines of the European Union, African Union, and ASEAN.

The states of the Indian subcontinent will have no future in the age of globalization unless they unite in an entity that will ensure their strength at a time when the nation state no longer has a place, even if it is as strong economically and technologically as Germany or France. Germany, France, and other European states can only survive within a European Union that can withstand the challenges of globalization.

Each one of the giant entities that will replace the nation states and make up the new world, will have its single army, security structures, single market, single currency, single central bank, and most importantly a single negotiating position with the other similar giant entities.

The nation state is no longer able to negotiate the tortuous paths of the globalize world. This is the best solution for the peoples of the region who share the same destiny. The reactionary methods employed in the paths have brought those peoples nothing but tragedies and destruction.


The rotten kind :D
@jamahir

and one who eats this rotten fruit becomes a zombie.

Is a Sanghi a certain kind of fruit?

the dharmic brotherhood in india are notorious eaters of this fruit.


----

[1] India to be home to 4.37 lakh millionaires by 2018: Study | Page 3

[2] '(lips)Kiss of love' protest outside RSS office in Delhi, 70 detained | Page 26

[3] Yechury says yoga is 'dog's body movement', Twitter users lash out | Page 8

[4] kashmir : the definitive solution
 
.
Some people expressed their views .Because they have freedom of expression i this democratic nation.But it is upto us to decide whether that is allowable or not .
And I am saying majority of Indians including me wont allow that .Irrespective of our religion we Indians wouldnt allow some other nations to grab our hard earned economic achievements.India is only for Indians and always will be.

So you are saying that Ram Madhav is irrational when he voices his views on akhand Bharat? That he is a minority view in RSS type organization's?



I have been also in RSS.Trust me we Indians wont accept some idiotic suggestions of a religious head .We are always rationalists and always will be.
 
.
Zero chance.. Even the guys who talk about it know it's just an impractical notion. It's just to ruffle feathers.
 
. .
Hi all,
I was wondering about how much seriousness there is in the Hindu/Indian political and social circles to materialize the goal of a greater India comprising Pakistan,India and Bangladesh.
Is this whole idea even considered a legitimate ideological and political goal among the masses for which they must aspire,desire,pray and strive towards or is it just an over blown ambition of an extremist few ?
What about the modern Indian mindset ? Is this idea of any importance or is it considered a whimsical ambition of a crazy people of ancient mind set ?
It would be interesting to know.

Its bull $hit. ignore that concept called akhand bharat.
 
. .

RSS is just a cultural organization .They are only a minority in this 1.25 billion people .
And they have their own views .Your concerns cant change their freedom of expression whether you like it or not.
But people of India will decide our fate .
Perhaps we might had relation with othe SA nations during past .But currently we are different and always will be .
Indians wont allow other people in our turf.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom