hatehs
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
- Messages
- 1,901
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
?You dumb fvck is making is his point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
?You dumb fvck is making is his point.
Sure sure. China is busy fighting Xi and PAK busy filling up imf forms. Just watch out and have a plan B in case they stop your pensionFrontier Undefined province will settle demarcation between China and itself in a semi autonomous environment.
Ever since Indian declaration of war in 2019 by unilateral actions in the disputed territory and subjugation of the native population through demographic changes, Kashmir has become a bilateral issue between Pakistan and China.
India has continuously skirmished with China in Ladakh ever since. The skirmishes round up the 2 front war doctrine since 2016 of the Indian army which is battling internal rogue elements increasingly over the past 2 years at the height of which saw an infamous helicopter crash.
Things are going the other way. In 1947 you had Akhand Bharat. Now it's 3 Khand Bharat. In 2100 30 Khand Bharat.
Akhand Bharat will happen but under a different name called Ghazwa-e-Hind
Hindu rashtra is being strong day by day .Saffroning the Past: Of Myths, Histories and Right-Wing Agendas
Uma Chakravarti
Saffroning the Past: Of Myths, Histories and Right-Wing Agendas on JSTOR
Uma Chakravarti, Saffroning the Past: Of Myths, Histories and Right-Wing Agendas, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 33, No. 5 (Jan. 31 - Feb. 6, 1998), pp. 225-232www.jstor.org
Abstract
Towards the late 1980s the stage was set for a conflation of an ongoing social and political crisis of a high order with the surfacing of middle class insecurities about the state of 'their' nation and of 'their' hegemonic position within it. This was the background to a rightward shift of politics, the rise of a fascist hindutva brigade and a shift of upper caste, middle class allegiance to Hindu majoritarian ideological and political formations. The ideological context for this shift was a crisis of the legitimacy of the state. One way of dealing with the crisis is to 're'construct the nation's 'glorious' past. And this is being done today not through powerful writing but through the power of the visual medium, the cinema and the television. It was a fairly conscious move by the state to telecast religious mega serials, 'Ramayana' and 'Mahabharata'. 'Chanakya' took off on the theme of a fragmented nation, carrying the mythological tradition forward in a more coherent way emphasising a joint 'xenophobia' against the enemy within. Although 'Chanakya"s appeal was limited to an upper caste elite, it was part of a larger process in which a brahmanic Hindu view of history and culture was consolidated along with a rightward shift in politics.
Pakistan is not much problem , it is struggling with its own problems of political , financial and military crisis .Apparently, Dr. Manpreet Sethi, a Distinguished Fellow at Centre for Air Power Studies in New Delhi, sees a "Crisis in the Making" after General Khalid Kidwai's speech on Pakistan's new nuclear doctrine.
Pakistan’s New Nuclear Strategy Is a Crisis in the Making
Proposals to deploy front-line tactical nuclear weapons, on the basis that India will not respond to their usage, is folly. Yet that is precisely what Pakistan’s military leadership is seemingly proposing.nationalinterest.org
She writes: "Formulations like full-spectrum deterrence, buoyed by new weaponry, may seem cohesive to Rawalpindi. But that is not the case in either New Delhi nor Washington. Policymakers from both ought to make this clear to Pakistan’s military leadership"
This Indian reaction is similar to what we heard after Pakistan responded to India's "Cold State" doctrine with tactical Nasr missile. But Nasr did succeed in burying the talk of Cold Start by New Delhi.
The West especially the US has never faced a threat that is the size and magnitude of China.. The USSR was a military threat to the US but it had no economy, China is both, a military and an economy that is poised to be the biggest, Its the economy that drives the MIC like they say its the economy stupid. .The West will help India to build a bigger economy in competition to keep China under control. Any other conclusions reached are flimsy understanding of the stated goals.
Suhasini Haidar
@suhasinih
In scathing edit ahead of SL President Wickremsinghe visit to Delhi, Sunday Times points to "double standards" by govt including demanding for devolution in SL North/East while "stripping Kashmirs autonomy", concern for SL Tamils vs brushing off of SL Tamil fisherman issues.
-----------
Sri Lanka's Sunday Times editorial
President’s long-awaited date with India PM
President’s long-awaited date with India PM
www.sundaytimes.lk
The Indian side is predictably going to demand an acceleration of the projects already on the table especially in the power sector (as with Nepal) and an oil and gas pipeline from Trincomalee to Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu allowing Indian companies to get entrenched further in the Sri Lankan economy. There will also likely be demands for devolution and the full implementation of the 13th Amendment in Sri Lanka (never mind stripping Kashmir of devolution) while dodging issues like the continuing poaching by Indian fishermen in Lankan waters – which is a ‘humanitarian issue’ for the Indian fishermen at the expense of the humanitarian issue of the Sri Lankan fishermen in the North.
The Sri Lankan side will necessarily have to recognise and thank India for the life-saving support (spoilt by the demand by the Indian Foreign Minister for contra deals) given from end-2021 to bail out a bankrupt Sri Lanka before the IMF came in and acknowledge the backing by India’s Finance Minister in the debt restructuring process that enabled the IMF intervention.
The problem for Sri Lanka is that it has no muscle, no clout to bargain as equal partners for win-win solutions when in Delhi, their home turf. It is a lopsided balance sheet.
As the Buddha told his chief disciple Ananda, “be wide awake”, President Wickremesinghe will need to follow the advice of India’s greatest son when it comes to discussing and interpreting India’s idea of leading to ‘a point of positive transformation’ of the Indo-Lanka relationship within the context of its ‘extended neighborhood’ policy.
We will welcome all countries who come to benefit economy of India , but our foreign policy will remain independent .The West especially the US has never faced a threat that is the size and magnitude of China.. The USSR was a military threat to the US but it had no economy, China is both, a military and an economy that is poised to be the biggest, Its the economy that drives the MIC like they say its the economy stupid. .
India is a counterbalance to China and the West/US will do everything in its power to pump up its proxy both economy and military to threaten China.
There are no permanent friends or enemies but interests.
Apparently, Dr. Manpreet Sethi, a Distinguished Fellow at Centre for Air Power Studies in New Delhi, sees a "Crisis in the Making" after General Khalid Kidwai's speech on Pakistan's new nuclear doctrine.
Pakistan’s New Nuclear Strategy Is a Crisis in the Making
Proposals to deploy front-line tactical nuclear weapons, on the basis that India will not respond to their usage, is folly. Yet that is precisely what Pakistan’s military leadership is seemingly proposing.nationalinterest.org
She writes: "Formulations like full-spectrum deterrence, buoyed by new weaponry, may seem cohesive to Rawalpindi. But that is not the case in either New Delhi nor Washington. Policymakers from both ought to make this clear to Pakistan’s military leadership"
This Indian reaction is similar to what we heard after Pakistan responded to India's "Cold State" doctrine with tactical Nasr missile. But Nasr did succeed in burying the talk of Cold Start by New Delhi.
Pakistan had a golden opportunity to develop a long-lasting bilateral relationship with the US but missed the boat by supporting Afghan Taliban. You chose your side, now live with it.
Even if Afghanistan gets stabilized and trade with Central Asia is decent you lost 4 decades of timePakistan did the right thing. It's off topic though but I had to point it out. Absolutely sure of that.