Sir, you don't know anything about India. India is the most misogynist place in human history. Most rapes here against women happen not because the males were lustful but because they wanted to teach the women a lesson for being in public. The famous Jyoti Singh / Nirbhaya gangrape / torture case from Delhi 2012 happened because the criminals hated her for being out at night and with a male friend. They gangraped her and inserted metal rod into her vagina because they hated her being a free female, the same hate sentiment that Khamenei and his police and military have for the Irani women.
This is what Mukesh Singh, one of the gangrapists / torturers of Jyoti said without regret :
From the same article these are what the lawyers of those gangrapists / torturers said :
This is further what the lawyer of the Delhi rapists / torturers, ML Sharma, declared :
When the 8-year-old Kashmiri Muslim girl, Asifa, was gangraped and murdered in a Hindu temple in Jammu by the priest and some Hindutvadis and there was a police cover-up this wasn't lust, it was anti-Muslim hatred and anti-female hatred. Read this article about how they tortured her. What kind of lust was that ? And you know what happened then ? When the crooks were arrested the Hindutvadis including leaders of BJP party which rules India now, took out rallies in Jammu crying that the arrested "men" had families who were starving and they began collecting money for those "innocent" families. They shouted the slogan "Bharat Mata ki jai" which is a Hindutvadi slogan imposed on the country as the national slogan in 1947. They waved India's flag. Hindutvadis all over the country supported the gangrapists / torturers / murderers of Asifa.
However, if romantic / sexual dalliances in India are consensual they are frowned on by society, by the government and criminalized if the girl happens to be less than that stupid "adult age of 18" and especially if the male happens to say 30 and the male is then jailed under the irrational and Hindutvadi 2012 law called POCSO where the girl gets called a "child". LOL, how is a 15-year-old a child ? or even a 14-year-old ? The oppressive POCSO law derives from India's Anglo political system which is anti-democracy and there are political parties and elections and some idiot has arbitrarily declared that a human under the age of 18 is a "child" even if Nature commands puberty to be the age when one becomes naturally adult, especially the female. And this law becomes more dangerous if the male is Muslim and the girl is non-Muslim where the case turns into the Hindutvadis calling the male doing "Love Jihad" on the girl. And then there is of course the 3000-year-old Hindu culture of honor killing done by parents, brothers, cousins and villagers.
However, India has a large male homosexual culture. Just today a news agency, Deccan Herald, spoke of a man raping and killing a 1-year-old boy. The infant was killed because the crime would become known. When I was new to my city many years ago I went to the city's biggest public library's area. As I was walking near the lawns in that public place a middle-aged man came on his scooter and stopped near me and told me directly that his wife was out of town so he and me can "have fun at his house". I am good-looking and have had females and males admiring me openly or covertly but this was something different.
Lastly, please read in this long post of mine of the anti-True-Islamic culture of the modern Indian "Muslim" male with his beard, above-ankle white kurta pyjama dress, sometimes the Arab thawb as if wearing it will make him magically more Islamic ( LOL ) and the mesh cap, and the modern Indian "Muslim" female with her burqa with a cloth tightly bound around her head for the naqab. I have seen a burqa'ed woman going by my house with her seven-year-old daughter burqa'ed up. India has the largest number of burqa wearers in the world. The post is also about Islam generally and the irani protests.
I haven't even told you about female feticide.
So, my friend, you know nothing about India.But Indian anti-female anti-human traditional culture is not different from the Irani mullahs who impose the hijab.
These pictures have no context. No time of photography, no location. So they prove nothing.
It is always a sensible minority which changes things and progresses humanity. Weren't Hazrat Muhammad and his early Muslims a minority ? Weren't the Communist philosophers a minority ? In India now the rational people are in a minority, including me. The rest are right-wingers whether Hindu or Muslim or otherwise. Should that mean I decide I am wrong ? You may use the word "minority" to describe the irani protesters and they may be in minority or you are hiding the scale of the protests but this is a legitimate protest and the illegitimate Irani mullah terrorists should fall. They have no right to hold hostage the Irani women because of perverted beliefs. This is undemocratic and anti-human. The Western governments support the Irani mullahs tacitly but the Irani people will prevail, now or a year later.
Lastly, I will tell you that just yesterday in the South Indian city of Bangalore two Irani women expats protested against the mullahs on a prominent street, one chaining herself to a pole. In other Indian cities where there are Irani students they want to protest and hold marches but are afraid that the Hindu mullah government of Modi will deport them to Iran. Please don't mislead the people and especially yourself about the scale and intent of these protests.
Absolutely ! The shame !
I Liked his post because he was reasonable there.
1. Iran's establishment does not run a Islamic republic. No Muslim-majority country does now. It was only I will say the Libyan Jamahirya, a Communist-Socialist truly revolutionary society unlike the fake Islamic revolution of Khomenei. Here is a Libyan girl from 2011 during NATO bombing, speaking her support for Muammar and the jamahiriya, and she does not wear hijab :
2. Balkanizing Iran into what ?
3. You keep speaking against NATO and one of its components is the Turkish government and both the Iran government and Turkish government oppress the Kurds and use any excuse to bombard the Kurds including the PKK elements. Iran government fired missiles into Kurd bases in Iraq recently. Where is there a confluence between Khamenei and Erdogan ?
Yet Irani military's first goals in Syria and those of its Shia non-Syrian allies in Syria included securing Shia-followed buildings like of Sayyida Zaynab that you write of later :
Holy Shrine Defender - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Shia religious mythology, beliefs and mysticism is more important to Irani military in Syria than defending the Syrian people and the Baath system.
1. Please don't use the word Iran to describe what are just the objectives of the Irani mullah government and its military elements like Basij, IRGC etc. These people do not represent the beliefs and aspirations of the most of the Irani people including those who are now protesting despite being violently opposed by the government.
"Iran" word used by Iran government to describe its policies is as misleading as Modi using "India" to describe his fascist, anti-human, Hindutvadi governments and administrators at the center and in many states. The Communist Party of India was established by seven people including two Muslims in Tashket in Uzbek SSR in 1920 - 102 years ago. Then the CPI dispersed into various factions within India and into the Communist Party of Pakistan and Communist Party of Bangladesh at the due times. In the pre-Indian-Partition days in Srinagar city in India-administrated Kashmir the famous landmark called Lal Chowk was so renamed by Kashmiri Muslim and Sikh Communists in inspiration from Red Square in Communist Moscow in their agitation against the Hindu raja whose dynasty had been created in the 1800s by the British colonialists. Does Modi represent all these streams in India ? There are many non-Communist progressives in India too. Modi does not represent any of that yet he arrogantly and lyingly uses "India" as if his word and ideology represents the desires and thinking of all Indians and India's history and current. This is improper and so is you and the Irani government using "Iran" to talk as if they represent all Iranis.
2. Iran promoting inter-denominational unity ? Firstly, the NATO-supported mullahs, whether openly supported or tacitly like in case of the Irani government, have always worked against Muslim advancement, freedoms and natural human rights. Secondly, what is Iran government doing in case of Yemen in not sending daily convoys of ships to feed the starving Yemeni people ? Iran government is busy in breaking the heads and bodies of Irani women. What unity is being displayed here ? What was the response of Iran government in 2011, especially then president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to the invasion of the Sunni-majority Libyan jamahiriya ? The biggest military invasion ever which also included Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood, the former being the supposed enemy of the Iran government ? Mahmoud declared that the NATO-created destruction of the Libyan jamahiriya "was the will of the Libyan people".
You are claiming that the Irani protesters are NATO / Zionist enabled but tell me, it has been what two months since the protests started yet no vociferous condemnation by Western governments against the Irani mullah regime. Western music artistes are boycotting Qatar football events because Qatar government speaks against LGBT but these same Western music artistes have not uttered a word in support of Mahsa, Niko and the protesters and against the Irani government, the police, the Basij, the burqa brigade and the military. There is no talk of NATO-aided regime change for Iran. No "Right 2 Protect". No "They are killing civilians including women and children". Words NATO used in United Nations Terrorist Council against iraq, Libya and Syria. Why ? I want regime change in Iran but NATO does not. NATO never wanted the mullahs out. Khomenei was sitted comfortably by French government for a year till he arrogantly arrived in Tehran in 1979. NATO desires for the Irani mullahs to rule. All those sanctions are as fake as those imposed on India after India blasted nukes. You want to know what are sanctions then look at the DPRK.
Already answered above. In addition, Libya aided iran during Iran-Iraq war yet why didn't Irani military go to Libya in 2011 to aid Muammar Gaddafi and his guided Jamahiriya society and the Libyan defense forces against the imperialists you speak of in the next point ?
I will say Iran government should immediately declare war on NATO and Israel. All this in the middle of the Irani people declaring rebellion and agitation against Iran government. Let us see if the Irani people support the mullahs or use the opportunity to overthrow the mullahs and form their own progressive governance.
There you are ! Defense of religious mythology before defending the lives of the Syrian people. Not different than the so-called Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda and "I"SIS with its magazine called Dabiq.
1. You ignore Russia. There are Russian ships and aeroplanes in Syria and Syrians are present in Ukraine in support of Russia. Is the Irani military in Ukraine in support of "The Anti-imperialist Axis" ?
2. There is nothing Islamically religious about Irani mullahs and its military in Syria so it is incorrect to use the words secular and religious here. Islam in essence is a leftist ideology with much in common with modern Communism. Irani mullahs are none of this.
Because it is what the Irani people are now agitating for.
Syrians will reject it.
No, rightful ideology and humanity should always triumphs selfish governmental interests. Would the USSR have collaborated with the other fake Islamic Republic, that of the Taliban ?
Yes, the Irani protesters are mobs for you because they are not your beloved mullahs but reject the hijab. But we surely will find your past posts supporting Taliban mobs rampaging through Afghanistan before they took over last year all arranged by NATO.
Their country their problem. Stay out of it.
And Sorry to disagree with you on everything , but a few people protesting on the streets of a 80 million people country is not that big of a deal, not for the guy you want out at least.
Let`s worry about india problems, shall we? Because apparently the people of Iran is not that worried. Like, at all.There's an old saying, that it's better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth or in your case text, then remove all doubt. Another way to put it, is if you don't know what you're talking about, shut up...
Download the PDF
