What's new

Iran unveils hypersonic weapon 'Fattah'

Let's assume Fattah hypersonic missile costs 4mln$, Paveh cruise missile costs 700.000$, Shahed-136 suicide drone costs 20.000$.

Israel has:

1) 12 powerplants with 48 production units producing 100% of Israel's electricity---48 Fattah hypersonic missiles can destroy entire Israeli electricity generating capacity in 6 minutes at a cost of 192mln dollars.

2) 10 desalination plants providing 100% of Israel's water---- Assuming 4 Fattah missiles per one desalination plant and 40 Fattah hypersonic missiles can leave entire Israel without water in 6 minutes at a cost of 160mln dollars.

3) Three major ports: Haifa, Ashdod and Eilat---Assuming 20 missiles per one port and 60 missiles can destroy all major Israeli ports at a cost of 240mln dollars.

4) 9 airbases with 320 combat aircrafts, 4 AWACS, 4 aerial refueling tankers, 14 transport aircrafts ==a total of 342 targets plus airbase infrastructure-----350 Fattah hypersonic missiles at a cost of 1,4bln dollars, supported by 700 Paveh cruise missiles (2 missiles per target) at a cost of 490mln dollars can destroy entire Israeli Air Force on the ground

5) Residence of Israeli Prime-Minister, Knesset, Ministry of Defense----Assuming 3 missiles per one building and 9 missiles can destroy these Residences at a cost of 36mln dollars.

6) Various economic targets-----20.000 Shahed-136s at a cost of 400mln dollars can destroy all economic targets in Israel.

The total cost of destroying Israel: critical infrastructure, Israeli economy, Israeli Government and Israeli Air Force is-----2918mln dollars (507 Fattah missiles, 700 Paveh cruise missiles, 20.000 Shahed-136 drones)

Even if such strike will be only 50% successful it will still be a disaster for Israel

Israel can inflict comparable damage to Iran only with nuclear weapons.

Israeli Orot Rabin powerplant

View attachment 933357

Ashkelon desalination plant
View attachment 933358

Port of Haifa

View attachment 933359

Ramon Air Base in Israel
View attachment 933360
you forgot Israeli Navy
Add IN as well and then tell us the total cost of destroying Israel
 
If Iran bombed Israel in the way a member described in a post above,to the point of destroy the Israeli military installations and civilian infastracture,that would make Iran a priority for a big part of the Western world to take action. the Americans would quickly gather an alliance to bomb Iran to pieces.
I think you'd be surprised how low public support in the US for a war with Iran would be. A direct US involvement would make the Iraq war look like a walk in the park. It would basically be political suicide for any US president. In Europe, Israel has less support than in the US. And why would European countries want to get directly involved in a bloody conflict in the Middle East while they didn't even show such determination when one of their allies (Ukraine) was literally invaded in their own neighborhood?
 
I think you'd be surprised how low public support in the US for a war with Iran would be. A direct US involvement would make the Iraq war look like a walk in the park. It would basically be political suicide for any US president. In Europe, Israel has less support than in the US. And why would European countries want to get directly involved in a bloody conflict in the Middle East while they didn't even show such determination when one of their allies (Ukraine) was literally invaded in their own neighborhood?
If Iran eradicated Israel,then everyone else would feel threatened. Especially the Americans and their Western European allies. They would even make use of tactical nukes. It wouldn't be a land invasion. They would consider Iran a threat that has to be dealth with right now,instead of just a problem.
 
@Foinikas

The scenarios being mentioned above are based on an Iranian retaliation to an Israel strike. Iran would use conventional weapons, not nuclear weapons. The only country that would provide actual military support to Israel would the Americans, to what extend, it is hard to predict. The Europeans would certainly not get directly involved militarily. The point of these scenarios is to show just how vulnerable Israel is to an Iranian counterstrike.
 
@Foinikas

The scenarios being mentioned above are based on an Iranian retaliation to an Israel strike. Iran would use conventional weapons, not nuclear weapons. The only country that would provide actual military support to Israel would the Americans, to what extend, it is hard to predict. The Europeans would certainly not get directly involved militarily. The point of these scenarios is to show just how vulnerable Israel is to an Iranian counterstrike.
That's what I'm saying,even if it is conventional weapons,if the majority of Israeli installations and infastracture was destroyed,that would make the Americans and their closest allies feel threatened. And angered. They,in turn would convince other countries to take part by showing how much the "mullah regime has become strong and needs to been taken care of". Imagine the media: "Jews about to face a second Holocaust" or "A new genocide" etc etc. That's the warmonger's best excuse to annihilate Iran.
 
If Iran eradicated Israel,then everyone else would feel threatened. Especially the Americans and their Western European allies. They would even make use of tactical nukes. It wouldn't be a land invasion. They would consider Iran a threat that has to be dealth with right now,instead of just a problem.
If a country felt threatened by Iran the last thing they would want to do is to get involved and attack Iran with or without nuclear weapons but we're already off-topic here.
 
And we nuke them too

Are they love jewish terrorist regime more than themselves?
Dude,what kind of logic is that? "And we nuke them too". If your country gets nuked to pieces and your population exterminated,what good would that do to you?

If a country felt threatened by Iran the last thing they would want to do is to get involved and attack Iran with or without nuclear weapons but we're already off-topic here.
Bro,you know USA,Britain,France and others have nukes. A lot of nukes. If they think Iran is a rogue nation and Iran actually wiped out most of Israel's infastracture....that would only make them want to rush and destroy Iran.
 
That's what I'm saying,even if it is conventional weapons,if the majority of Israeli installations and infastracture was destroyed,that would make the Americans and their closest allies feel threatened. And angered. They,in turn would convince other countries to take part by showing how much the "mullah regime has become strong and needs to been taken care of". Imagine the media: "Jews about to face a second Holocaust" or "A new genocide" etc etc. That's the warmonger's best excuse to annihilate Iran.

If Israel strikes Iran first then these people cannot play the victim. People would actually support Iran's right to retaliate. The issue is actually rather simple, the above scenarios tell you why Israel has not and will never strike Iran directly, because they would be pounded to oblivion. Minus resorting to nukes, there is not much else they can do in response. And if they resort to nukes, it's game over for them. The other reason they will not attack Iran is because they don't even have the military capability to accomplish this.

Anyway, we're going off topic.
 
Dude,what kind of logic is that? "And we nuke them too". If your country gets nuked to pieces and your population exterminated,what good would that do to you?


Bro,you know USA,Britain,France and others have nukes. A lot of nukes. If they think Iran is a rogue nation and Iran actually wiped out most of Israel's infastracture....that would only make them want to rush and destroy Iran.
Its about "dare"
Israhell is a terrorist regime. We should destroy terrorists. Its our "duty".

And "we will"
 
Take your meds....
Tell me what sounds illogical to what I'm saying.

An Iranian attack that would devastate Israel,would cause a war against Iran by the biggest western countries.

Do you find that illogical?!

Its about "dare"
Israhell is a terrorist regime. We should destroy terrorists. Its our "duty".

And "we will"
Ah. Even if it leads to nuclear war and the destruction of Persia. You'd insist.

And if they resort to nukes, it's game over for them. The other reason they will not attack Iran is because they don't even have the military capability to accomplish this.
Wait,wait wait...why is it game over for them? They have the upper hand when it comes to that. And like @LeGenD explained in detail,they have way more chances to survive a nuclear war,unlike Iran. And they have more nukes.

It's not completely off-topic. The purpose of the Fatteh missile is just this.
 
Last edited:
Tell me what sounds illogical to what I'm saying.

An Iranian attack that would devastate Israel,would cause a war against Iran by the biggest western countries.

Do you find that illogical?!


Ah. Even if it leads to nuclear war and the destruction of Persia. You'd insist.


Wait,wait wait...why is it game over for them? They have the upper hand when it comes to that. And like @LeGenD explained in detail,they have way more chances to survive a nuclear war,unlike Iran. And they have more nukes.

It's not completely off-topic. The purpose of the Fatteh missile is just this.
You think destruction of israel is a big deal. No its not.
Even without nukes they will destroy easily . You will see in future.
War is a gamble, if you want to start a war, you should prepare yourself for every thing possible.
 
You think destruction of israel is a big deal. No its not.
Even without nukes they will destroy easily . You will see in future.
War is a gamble, if you want to start a war, you should prepare yourself for every thing possible.
Man,sometimes Persians here are more deluded than Turks.

What makes you think that you have what it takes to fight the world? Even Russians can turn against you if they feel you got way too strong.
 

Back
Top Bottom