What's new

Iran to take action if US aircraft carrier returns

Mon vieux je parles francais sans accent, mieux que toi, alors la ferme, bon a rien !
Then if you speak better French than me it is better you don't make faults.
"Je parle" and not "Je parles"
"la fermes" and not "la ferme"
pauvre type. tu ne connais même pas l'Iran et tu viens faire la vedette. Ton ignorance de la révolution ne t'empêche pas de beaucoup écrire pour dire de ces sottises. Tes réactions haineuses sont affligeantes .
Anyway saying Mosa is smarter than me.... what to say... is it 5 yo attitude or maybe 6 yo? let me guess
 
Yes, this Arab-Iranian rivalry, on both sides, is the greatest gift to the enemies of the region.
Yes totally agree.
If you go to balatarin a website in farsi ... just check the royalits comments on news:
one sentence over two would be this: Arabs are retarded or Islam is bad. And for them Islam could be only from retarded Arabs.
Of course they are smarter people than this: the son of the shah is more respectful or Nahavandi in France ...
i guess they are many young people they don't know really Iran and some never went there except for a very short time.
 
You know, you make Iranians look bad with your poor English and poor ability to argue your points.
I am only replying to you in compassion because you are my compatriot.
I have no racist beliefs, and I judge people only on their individual merits.
If you want to expand your horizons, learn from Mosamania.
He is an Arab alright, and damn smarter than you are, wiser, and more humble too.

Hussein is one of the best posters on this forum. He is strongly pro-Iran, knowledgeable and is very calm. You should avoid insulting people's religion to keep the discussion civil.
 
If Iran commits a mistake of attacking the US aircraft carrier, it will not be good for the region. There is a high chance that it could trigger ww3 because USA will retaliate really bad!
 
Yes totally agree.
If you go to balatarin a website in farsi ... just check the royalits comments on news:
one sentence over two would be this: Arabs are retarded or Islam is bad. And for them Islam could be only from retarded Arabs.
Of course they are smarter people than this: the son of the shah is more respectful or Nahavandi in France ...
i guess they are many young people they don't know really Iran and some never went there except for a very short time.

I had a very good Iranian friend called Ardavan in college. He grew up in France and his family was related to the Shah. He had a natural aristocratic bearing, just because of his upbringing, but he was the nicest guy you could meet. He wasn't a practicing Muslim but he was respectful, and one of his best friends was an Arab.

So, its funny to hear some of these Iranians on the internet. Sometimes, the subjects are more loyal than the king.
 
Iran should launch 50-100 missiles simultaneously at the Aircraft carrier

Follow by 30-40 Low skimming sea surface Crsuise missiles

And then send in few Torpedoes on the supporting ships

Any clean up can be done by Iran Airforce and get rid of the American Trash
 
Iran should launch 50-100 missiles simultaneously at the Aircraft carrier

Follow by 30-40 Low skimming sea surface Crsuise missiles

And then send in few Torpedoes on the supporting ships

Any clean up can be done by Iran Airforce and get rid of the American Trash

Did you power these? Amazing!:eek:

hot-air-balloons.jpg
 
Iran should launch 50-100 missiles simultaneously at the Aircraft carrier

Follow by 30-40 Low skimming sea surface Crsuise missiles

And then send in few Torpedoes on the supporting ships

Any clean up can be done by Iran Airforce and get rid of the American Trash
we need just 3 persian gulf missiles for convert a AC into a trash
 
It will be foolish for Iran to attack the US Fleet. Japan made that mistake and did win the first round of the battle at Pearl Harbor, but then US finished the last round.

US Naval Fleet is very powerful and Iran's Forces will be no match for a long term conflict.
 
Iran should launch 50-100 missiles simultaneously at the Aircraft carrier

Follow by 30-40 Low skimming sea surface Crsuise missiles

And then send in few Torpedoes on the supporting ships

Any clean up can be done by Iran Airforce and get rid of the American Trash


no iranian recon plane can detect the position of US aircraft carrier ... US Carrier battle group will make sure that to the radius of 300-500 kms and beyond that no iranian activity is present anywhere near to an Aircraft Carrier// no sattelite support / no recon support that means no guidance available for cruise missile //... and thrfore no active guidance for any thing... so no way iran can attack an aircraft carrier and still smhow .... if they were successful to sink(impossible for iran) that ... boy that would be THE END of Iran... no military was as powerful as US military in recorded history of men... and a aircraft carrier if sunk will call for a nuke strike on iran.. wiping iran fully from the planet// so my advice for iran ... dont mess with US of A....
 
Most people, including yours truly, thought that the Shah was bad, and we needed someone/something better. Instead, we got something worse. I was a teenager at the time, and I thought wow this spiritual man (Khomeini) sounds so cool, he is so radical, and maximalist, he is the one. Pure emotions ... my father knew better than I did. This is how revolutions start, young emotional people wanting to trash everything, regardless of consequences, and getting duped by demagogues. With the hordes of villagers (mostly men) having taken over Tehran, all coming looking for work in the capital from all corners of the country, feeling lost, culturally, alone, single, furstrated ... a messianic figure promising the sky was truly a "godsend".

Most of the clerics had little knowledge of the world. Few or no citizens would send their children to the theological schools, so most of the mullahs (incl. Khomeini) were basically village people who studied theology. Their whole world was Islam, Arabic language, Arabo-Islamic causes (Palestine, etc.). Lots of incompetent people took over initially reins of power - a good example was that Khomeini's driver became head of Tehran University.

Unfortunately, their rhetorical provocations against neighbors, Israel, US, and the hostage taking, together with the purges of the army, led to all the problems that we are facing now. An Iranian who cares about his country first, and not Islam first, would not have provoked Israel and other neighbors. Israel did nothing against Iran - their problems were with Arabs - but the Iranian government made them into mortal enemies, and given their influence in the US, they have made Iran and Iranians pay heavily. However, Hating and battling Israel was not our cause - it was an Arab and pan-Islamic cause ... one that even Arabs and other muslims did not care about. Yet Iran had become more Arabs than Arabs themselves, and worse than that, the Arabs themselves did not appreciate Iran's involvement. So, we got both Israel, Arabs, and US to hate Iran ... I could go on forever but ... Iran and US could have continued a good relationship after the revolution if wiser people had taken power. Now, both countries are entrenched in their positions, unwilling to talk, with decades of mutual hostility and bitterness to back it all up. All the result of a bunch of village idiots coming to power and getting everyone upset, including both Arabs (Saddam, Saudis), Israel/USA, and even the Soviets (they placed loudspeakers at the borders right efter the revolution asking muslims there to rise up agains communist infidels).

Now, the village idiots have evolved and become much more sophisticated. For sure there have been positive things also about the lasst 3 decades in Iran, some good achievements ... but more could have been done. Mistakes made in the first few years however have caused problems that cannot be resolved ....

Well, much of the content there are fair. But I think the reason why people didn't like the Shah was because they didn't like an American lapdog. There were a host of other issues that he overlooked.

Otherwise, he wouldn't have been overthrown so easily.

Arab culture, and Persian culture are very, very different and unique. In fact, I highly admire Iran's historical and cultural heritage and one of the oldest in the world.

But I think the key mistake the young hot-blooded revolutionists did back in 1979 was occupying the US embassy. That infuriated the Americans. And sadly, there's a lack of compromise on both sides.

Iran could have potentially bridged more understanding between Islam and the West. And perhaps help find a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian issue (it matters to regional stability).

I mean, the current Arab states even with all their wealth have hardly done anything that'd make a difference. They silently watched Lebanon being bombed back to the stone age in 2006. Utterly spineless I'd say. Utterly spineless...They only think about themselves.

@topic:
Whatever Iran does, do not even think about provoking the USN. They are an extremely powerful force with no equal in this world. This is not my opinion by the way. I mean, not even the Chinese or Russians dare do that.
 
Great post :tup: It seems Iran decided instead of folding, bring up the heat and see whats cooking :azn: If war happens, Iran has a better chance now than later, and their leadership understands it well.

What I said before, Iran is in very good position to win over US right now. Have a look on their way of talking, if that US’s aircraft carrier goes there again, the chances are only 50% that it will back :smokin:

“We recommend to the American warship that passed through the Strait of Hormuz and went to Gulf of Oman not to return to the Persian Gulf,” said Maj. Gen. Ataollah Salehi, the commander in chief of the army, as reported by Iran’s official news agency, IRNA. “The Islamic Republic of Iran will not repeat its warning.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/04/w...r-aircraft-carrier.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=world
 
I think sanctions from Iran would now be removed to have peace in the world.

Energy analysts say even a partial blockage of the Strait of Hormuz could raise the world price of oil within days by $50 a barrel or more, and that would quickly push the price of a gallon of regular gasoline to well over $4 a gallon. “You would get an international reaction that would not only be high, but irrationally high,” said Lawrence J. Goldstein, a director of the Energy Policy Research Foundation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/b...d-skyrocket-if-iran-closed-the-strait.html?hp
 
Back
Top Bottom