Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
the air campaign is not supposed to conquer countries , its duty is to soften enemy defense and make ground campaign a lot easier , also it's supposed to prevent enemy from softening your ground forces. just see how effective it was in Iraq and Afghanistan campaign (the NATO part was a success. the part that was supposed to be done by afghan government was a disaster.So unless you are fighting against a regular army with bases, military installment on the surface etc the air campaign is bound to fail without ground forces.
in Vietnam both USA and France had boot on the ground , they didn't knew how to fight asymmetric war , and tried to fight an asymmetric war in a symmetric manner. it was bound to fail.
and PGCC campaign would have even failed against scarecrows , what you have expected from people that had no reason to fight and didn't want to fight , only one person ego fueled the war and that is never enough
its understatement that saying Israel had no boot on ground , their ground forces was 15-20 time stronger in numbers than Hezbollah , something else resulted in that failure . again they wanted to fight an asymmetric war in a symmetric manner.
and RuAF don't knew how to fight , they still think its 60s or 70s