What's new

Iran shoots down Israeli drone operated by Azerbaijan violating Iranian airspace

That's nonsense. Countries have feelings.

The question is not whether countries "have feelings", it's whether seeing geopolitics in the context of friends is wise. There are no permanent friendships, everything is dynamic, temporary alignment of interest is all that exists between nations.

Use your own brain instead of parroting whatever you read. Realpolitik is Utopian.

Anyone that sees geopolitics in such terms is juvenile and bound to be disappointed, perpetually. Read below for more details.

If Turkey was attacked today the state of Pakistan would do everything in its capacity to support Turkey despite getting no economic or tangible benefit out of it. That's because Pakistani people love Turks and hence there's political will.

It was not long ago that you Pakistanis spoke in such warm terms about the Persian Gulf Arabs, but we can see where you are now. Today your love is towards Turkey, let me save you the ending, Turkey will end up disappointing you as well.

The same feeling exists between people of Western countries.

I guess your history books don't have chapters on WW1/2.

'Countries have no friends' is only good in paper.

It's the realities of the world. You want to live in a romanticised fantasy. You people should at least learn from your own history.
 
.
Pakistanis have a tendency of supporting people that do not think once about them. Could you say the same in a vice versa scenario? Would turks even care 1 bit about pakistan?

Lol have you been sleeping under a rock? They are the only Muslim state who have been consistently vocal about Indian occupation of Kashmir. It hasn't been too long since Indians were livid about Turkey's open support and calling for action and boycott against Turkey in Indian boards as well as PDF. That means a lot for us.

So speak on your behalf only.
 
.
The question is not whether countries "have feelings", it's whether seeing geopolitics in the context of friends is wise. There are no permanent friendships, everything is dynamic, temporary alignment of interest is all that exists between nations.


Anyone that sees geopolitics in such terms is juvenile and bound to be disappointed, perpetually. Read below for more details.


It was not long ago that you Pakistanis spoke in such warm terms about the Persian Gulf Arabs, but we can see where you are now. Today your love is towards Turkey, let me save you the ending, Turkey will end up disappointing you as well.


I guess your history books don't have chapters on WW1/2.


It's the realities of the world. You want to live in a romanticised fantasy. You people should at least learn from your own history.

I live in romanticized fantasy or you live in Realpolitik Utopia? I guess time can tell.

WW1/2 is gone. It will never repeat. Try attacking one Western nation and they will all unite to wipe you off the face of the Earth.

The common Pakistani people were never pro-Gulf. We always saw their rulers as scum. (We have nothing against common Arab people). It's the political elite that loved the Gulf, and still do, because they get PAID. Also there was a Salafi thing (minority people) going on since post 9-11 Afghan war time that has mostly lost it's steam now.

Turkey cannot let us down because they don't owe us anything. I wish to see a resurgent power in Turkey and hope that will keep other foreign troublemakers away from Middle East and bring prosperity to the greater Muslim world, like the Ottoman times. That is good enough for us.
 
.
I live in romanticized fantasy or you live in Realpolitik Utopia? I guess time can tell.

No need for waiting on the future when one can learn from the past, instead of trying to derive emotive reasoning, go read some history books.

WW1/2 is gone. It will never repeat.

That's what they thought after the end of WW1, but guess what happened?

Try attacking one Western nation and they will all unite to wipe you off the face of the Earth.

You're just highlighting your ineptitude, the point is to show the nature of reality, i.e these nations whom you consider "friends" today, wiped out millions of one another in the lifetime of people living today.

The common Pakistani people were never pro-Gulf. We always saw their rulers as scum. (We have nothing against common Arab people). It's the political elite that loved the Gulf, and still do, because they get PAID. Also there was a Salafi thing (minority people) going on since post 9-11 Afghan war time that has mostly lost it's steam now.

Pakistanis used to spout this Pakistan-Saudi brotherhood far more than they do regarding even Turkey today. Pakistanis even in this very forum in large number would be a proponent of sending troops into Saudi Arabia to fight their wars, this shift in attitude is very recently. You seem to think the rest of us are amnesic towards history.

Turkey cannot let us down because they don't owe us anything.

Let me teach you one way in which disappointment works. You claim you lot respect Turkey because of their mere words towards Kashmir, so what happen tomorrow if start jumping into India's camp like your ex-pals in the Persian Gulf?

I wish to see a resurgent power in Turkey and hope that will keep other foreign troublemakers away from Middle East and bring prosperity to the greater Muslim world, like the Ottoman times. That is good enough for us.

Instead of day dreaming about these fantasies regarding non-Pakistani actors, focus your energy on your own country. Turkey is part of a western, Christian led NATO, an organisation that has the blood of millions of Muslims on its hand and you're fantasising about them bring x y or z to the Muslim world. Turkey is just an image you have, in reality, they will not amount to much. Turkey is a dependent state on the west, with a snap of their fingers, they would destroy Turkey economically etc.
 
. .
That's what they thought after the end of WW1, but guess what happened?

No they didn't think that at the end of WW1. The treaties were extremely unfair against Germans and the relations remained hostile. Another war was around the horizon.

You're just highlighting your ineptitude, the point is to show the nature of reality, i.e these nations whom you consider "friends" today, wiped out millions of one another in the lifetime of people living today.

It is an extremely unique series of events that will never repeat. Everyone in the West regret it. British say they were on the wrong side of the War and the Germans are perpetually frightened by nationalism. The only way forward is European integration and the West will never have another war.

Pakistanis used to spout this Pakistan-Saudi brotherhood far more than they do regarding even Turkey today. Pakistanis even in this very forum in large number would be a proponent of sending troops into Saudi Arabia to fight their wars, this shift in attitude is very recently. You seem to think the rest of us are amnesic towards history.

Yeah right. They promised us Billions $ to send army to defend from Houthi and we resisted. Everyone is happy about it. We used to send Army to train them, and if the need arises, protect the Holy Cities. That's it. Again I'd like to highlight that we have nothing against common Arab people like you do. Just that the way you portray our nation is very wrong.

Our attitude towards Turkey was always different to our attitude towards other countries of Middle East.

Here's a quote by Quaid e Azam from 1948: " The exploits of your leaders in many a historic field of battle; the progress of your Revolution; the rise and career of the great Atatürk, his revitalization of your nation by his great statesmanship, courage and foresight all these stirring events are well-known to the people of Pakistan."

Our beloved Poet Muhammad Iqbal wrote numerous poems praising the Turks, Ataturk, their bravery at Gallipoli, for instance: “Let’s pray, brothers, that flag shall not fall down those bastions till doomsday. May the sun of Islam remain bright; may Allah help Mustafa Kemal, the great leader who defends Muslims...". Despite the fact the Ataturk brought down the Caliphate.

These quotes are 80 years old. Your idea that there's some new found love for Turkey like the rest of your lot here is wrong. Looks like I'm not the one in need of history lesson.

Let me teach you one way in which disappointment works. You claim you lot respect Turkey because of their mere words towards Kashmir, so what happen tomorrow if start jumping into India's camp like your ex-pals in the Persian Gulf?

You just said we need not wait for time and yet here you are predicting the future. Goes to show your own ineptitude. So shall I say again, let time tell who's right. We'll see if your wishes come true.

Instead of day dreaming about these fantasies regarding non-Pakistani actors, focus your energy on your own country. Turkey is part of a western, Christian led NATO, an organisation that has the blood of millions of Muslims on its hand and you're fantasising about them bring x y or z to the Muslim world. Turkey is just an image you have, in reality, they will not amount to much. Turkey is a dependent state on the west, with a snap of their fingers, they would destroy Turkey economically etc.

You think I'm sad or it pisses anyone off that Turkey is part of NATO? I've always supported their NATO membership as it gives them an edge vis-a-vis their neighbors. They can do whatever they want for their survival and to avoid 'a snap of their fingers'. So did the medieval Russians to avoid being crushed by Mongols. We can see who won the test of time!
Here's looking forward to Turkey's rise on the West and Pakistan's on the East of the Muslim world - I wish we can work with them to redesign the Middle East to our liking. We are like two wings that will take the Muslim world to newer heights never reached before, InshAllah.

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
 
.
No they didn't think that at the end of WW1. The treaties were extremely unfair against Germans and the relations remained hostile. Another war was around the horizon.

You're looking at history in retrospect, the point is at the time, no one was expecting yet another world war in that close proximity.

It is an extremely unique series of events that will never repeat.

Right, because you have a crystal ball and can predict the future.

Everyone in the West regret it.

The regretted the first war too.

British say they were on the wrong side of the War and the Germans are perpetually frightened by nationalism. The only way forward is European integration and the West will never have another war.

Again, you're trying to make predictions of war about the future with certainty, you lose credibility when you make such claims.

Yeah right. They promised us Billions $ to send army to defend from Houthi and we resisted.Everyone is happy about it

"Everyone", you seem to be living in denial. Go look at threads in this very forum and see the responses.

Just that the way you portray our nation is very wrong.

I am merely telling you the observations from your attitudes towards them from then to now and the seismic shift.

Our attitude towards Turkey was always different to our attitude towards other countries of Middle East.

Quantitively speaking, your kind were much more pro-Saudi than you are pro-Turkey. This is not surprising given Saudis gave you more than just words, they gave you finances. Turkey has done nothing for Pakistan minus mostly words.

Here's a quote by Quaid e Azam from 1948: " The exploits of your leaders in many a historic field of battle; the progress of your Revolution; the rise and career of the great Atatürk, his revitalization of your nation by his great statesmanship, courage and foresight all these stirring events are well-known to the people of Pakistan."

This does not change the discussion even in the slightest. I never said you did not have a pro-Turkey views.

Our beloved Poet Muhammad Iqbal wrote numerous poems praising the Turks, Ataturk, their bravery at Gallipoli, for instance: " “Let’s pray, brothers, that flag shall not fall down those bastions till doomsday. May the sun of Islam remain bright; may Allah help Mustafa Kemal, the great leader who defends Muslims...". Despite the fact the Ataturk brought down the Caliphate.

As above.

These quotes are 80 years old. Your idea that there's some new found love for Turkey like the rest of your lot here is wrong. Looks like I'm not the one in need of history lesson.

Once again, I never said you were not pro-Turkey, what I am saying is you're now much more in their camp after you realised how unreliable the Persian Gulf Arabs were. You're now much more vocal in terms of your Turkey favouritism.

You just said we need not wait for time and yet here you are predicting the future. Goes to show your own ineptitude. So shall I say again, let time tell who's right. We'll see if your wishes come true.

I asked you a hypothetical question, not made absolute claims regarding the future. This is elementary level logic.

You think I'm sad or it pisses anyone off that Turkey is part of NATO? I've always supported their NATO membership as it gives them an edge vis-a-vis their neighbors.

Good for you, then just don't pretend to be thinking about the Islamic world when you're supporting a country part of an organisation which is biggest killers of Muslims in recent memory.

They can do whatever they want for their survival and to avoid 'a snap of their fingers'. So did the medieval Russians to avoid being crushed by Mongols. We can see who won the test of time!

Modern world is different, back then people were already on low level living standard, today people's lives are connected greatly with means that when cut off, cause great instability in that society. In political time scale, it was only yesterday there was a coup attempt in Turkey, they're a highly unstable country to begin with. What do you think would happen if they start to collapse economically?

Here's looking forward to Turkey's rise on the West and Pakistan's on the East of the Muslim world - I wish we can work with them to redesign the Middle East to our liking. We are like two wings that will take the Muslim world to newer heights never reached before, InshAllah.

The dominant powers in the Middle East are Iran and Saudi Arabia (with the rest of PGCC), you have nigh zero clout to make any meaningful differences there. You seem to just be interested in peddling romantic fantasies rather than seeing the world as it is.
 
.
You're looking at history in retrospect, the point is at the time, no one was expecting yet another world war in that close proximity.

For someone so fixated on history, you didn't really study WW1 and the Treaty of Versailles, did you?

Clemenceau wanted a deal to cripple German military might, whereas Wilson wanted to avoid being too harsh that would cause Germans to seek revenge.

Eventually the deal that was reached was rightly predicted by the frustrated French General Foch as one that was "not harsh enough to prevent a future war, but harsh enough to provoke one".

You basically don't know what you're talking about.

I will get back to the rest of your post when I have time.
 
.
For someone so fixated on history, you didn't really study WW1 and the Treaty of Versailles, did you?

I did but you seem to not realise it does not change the discussion.

Clemenceau wanted a deal to cripple German military might, whereas Wilson wanted to avoid being too harsh that would cause Germans to seek revenge.

Once again, you are looking at history in retrospect. This is what is leading to your misguided conclusions. Why? Because you already know the war started hence you're finding the reasons why it did; but you seem to miss the obvious fact that those factors themselves do not guarantee that outcome generally speaking. In other words, we can have an nigh exact type of treaty today with a nation, but it does not guarantee the start of a war.

Eventually the deal that was reached was rightly predicted by the frustrated French General Foch as one that was "not harsh enough to prevent a future war, but harsh enough to provoke one".

See above.

You basically don't know what you're talking about.

I am finding I have to be teaching you elementary level logical reasoning. Your fallacious thinking is a form of circular reasoning.

I will get back to the rest of your post when I have time.

Spend some time thinking before you post, no point replying if you make such basics errors in judgement.
 
.
I did but you seem to not realise it does not change the discussion.



Once again, you are looking at history in retrospect. This is what is leading to your misguided conclusions. Why? Because you already know the war started hence you're finding the reasons why it did; but you seem to miss the obvious fact that those factors themselves do not guarantee that outcome generally speaking. In other words, we can have an nigh exact type of treaty today with a nation, but it does not guarantee the start of a war.



See above.



I am finding I have to be teaching you elementary level logical reasoning. Your fallacious thinking is a form of circular reasoning.



Spend some time thinking before you post, no point replying if you make such basics errors in judgement.


You clearly said no one predicted war. You said that didn't you - Philosopher: "...the point is at the time, no one was expecting yet another world war..."
I just told you Wilson feared 'revenge' (war) and Foch literally predicted war as a consequence of the treaty. How is that retrospect from my present day PoV? These statements were made by those leaders long before WW2 and is out there for everyone to read.

You just won't give in no matter what. I guess that takes some post-KG level maturity.
 
.
You clearly said no one predicted war. I just told you Wilson feared 'revenge' (war) and Foch literally predicted war as a consequence of the treaty.

Apparently I have to keep going in circles with you. I never have stated no one at all was concerned about a conflict, obviously you will find differing views in the world, I am talking about a overall feeling of an imminent next world war. Do I need to simply it further?

How is that retrospect from my present day PoV? These statements were made by those leaders long before WW2 and is out there for everyone to read.

Try reading my previous comment, properly. I explained it well enough regarding why your retro reasoning is fallacious.

You just won't give in no matter what. I guess that takes some post-KG level maturity.

Given your display of deficient basic reasoning skills, evidently I have to keep hammering the basic points until you will eventually comprehend them.
 
.
Last edited:
. .
Apparently I have to keep going in circles with you. I never have stated no one at all was concerned about a conflict, obviously you will find differing views in the world, I am talking about a overall feeling of an imminent next world war.

I just showed you the people who were responsible for drafting the treaty, the Presidents and the Generals, were afraid of another upcoming war. You cannot pass it off as simply "differing views". Apprehension and view aren't exactly the same thing.

Try reading my previous comment, properly. I explained it well enough regarding why your retro reasoning is fallacious.

More like you haven't ready my posts properly.


Given your display of deficient basic reasoning skills, evidently I have to keep hammering the basic points until you will eventually comprehend them.

Now that the facts are against you, you harp about reasoning skills. Like I'm talking to a 12 yr old.
 
.
I just showed you the people who were responsible for drafting the treaty, the Presidents and the Generals, were afraid of another upcoming war. You cannot pass it off as simply "differing views". Apprehension and view aren't exactly the same thing.

So is your strategy here to keep going in circles and hope I'll let you off the hook? If that's it then you need to try much harder.

More like you haven't ready my posts properly.

I systematically responded to every aspect of your posts, they were just a mishmash of logical fallacies.

Now that the facts are against you, you harp about reasoning skills. Like I'm talking to a 12 yr old.

Resorting to insults will not help your case, not here. Only maturity will earn your thoughts respect.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom