Iran and the Shah: What Really Happened

[Iranwillrise]

Well, he like all other Iranians that have been militarily, religiously, culturally, linguistically (Farsi is basically half Arabic and they use the Arabic Alphabet with only 3 new additions) and even ethnically conquered (Iranian Arabs occupy parts of Iran today) by Arabs is desperate to find his new identity. After all everywhere he looks he see Arab traces. Whenever he opens his mouth too. He sees this everywhere. This is very traumatic. Moreover it is even more traumatic for them to learn that even before Islam they were heavily influenced by us Semites on al fronts.

Says the one who uses Indo-Iranian numerals (a standard in this world), has persian words in Quran while his god/prophet denies it, does the wudhu before praying (a zoroastrian concept), and copied Mahdi from zoroastrianism, and half of his religion is attested by persians. Says the one who knows 30% to 50% of Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain have (indo-)Iranian origins.
God and Ferdowsi safed us from your culture, god thanks. Everything differs, our appearance, looks, music, food, festivals. Only thing is the partly iranianized shia religion which your countrymen call Majusi zoroastrians deserving to be beheaded, and even that is fading away.

Funny thing is these primitive semites are beheading each other, while Indo-europeans are giving them industry, machines, vehicles, fighter jets etc. But that doesnt count I guess.

I mean just look at their pre-Islamic alphabet. It was based on our Semitic Phoenician alphabet. Their capital was Babylon. A city that predates them with millenniums. Their first empires official language was Aramaic. A Semitic language closely related to Arabic. Their national symbols are also total ripoffs of our Semitic symbols. Their Pre-Islamic Gods have also been heavily influenced by our Semitic Gods. The list is enormous. Basically they are newcomers to the ME. We have lived in the ME for 30.000 years while they came 3.000 years ago from the barren Volga Steppe.

Old-persian alphabet was independent. Ofcourse we captured babylon, would US not capture Baghdad when invading Iraq? When we are among semitics those days and ruled most semitics we use Aramaic for communication, familair language there. What's so strange about that? You lived in barren deserts till you met the sumerians.

That so-called "Shah" came from a Kurdish peasant family from Iraq (Diyala). He failed on most fields and was removed by the Iranian masses. He was British installed.

Mazandarani, not kurdish, update your knowledge. In books he's less puppets than those arab puppets nowadays.

The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919: Mohammad Gholi Majd: 9780761826330: Amazon.com: Books
So you Brits killed 40% of Iran's population less than 100 years ago.

Nonsense, Kaveh Farrokh already wrote about this

However, “genocide” assumes the deliberate and wilfull killing of large numbers of non-combatants. That the British would deliberately undertake this is not believable and in this, Majd’s argument is not credible, it’s more of an emotional response. Which is understandable – picture in your mind if a third to a half of the US population had died off in WW1 from famine which was made worse by a foreign occupation under the same basis as happened in Persia. What would your reaction be?

What is believable is that this happened, albiet not deliberately induced by the British. After all, much the same thing happened in India during WW2, were a major famine resulted in millions dying, whilst all the effort of the Indian Govt went into fighting WW2 rather than alleviating the famine. Again, not genocide, just a focus of effort on the war and the ignoring of the fate of millions of civilians who were at best, irrelvant to the war effort.

Overall, a good study of this little known piece of history but the conclusion that this was a genocidal campaign by the British is sadly erroneous.

Now they have been ruled by people that claim Arab ancestry and Turban heads for 35 straight years and created a North Korea II in Iran. With some of the highest inflation rates in the world, poverty, pollution, smog everywhere in the main cities, some of the worst roads in the world, drought, lack of water resources, highest number of heroin addicts in the world, drug addiction, alcoholism, lack of newborns, gays and lesbians in the thousands, high crime rates, prostitution.

As the Arab Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah says then Iran is an Arab colony and has been so for the past 1400 years. Now our puppets the Basij's are oppressing every Farsi that speaks up about Arab colonization. If they do they will be hanged or killed or thrown in jail. Those that are against Arab colonial rule should go back to the Volga Steppe and join Borat. Or Afghanistan nearby. Here the Taliban rule with a harsh hand and they hate Farsis and killed many of them too despite being their cousins.

Suddenly there were 300000 seyeds only in some areas of turkey ottoman empire ......
Yes we know arabic culture is followed by michellin turban heads, however it resulted in destruction of it, just like many afghans who saw taliban and many kurds who see ISIS today. Funny isnt it , especially in long term it becomes funny.
However one thing i like is that they are playing games in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen killing millions of arabs. wiping out their countries and telling their puppet nasrollah to control angry sunni arabs ("Iran is ruled by arabs", Iran is not meddling etc). They even buy and rape sunni arab children of each other in Jordan and Saudi arabia and Syrian camps, people who lost their family and parents.

Even most Iranians in Europe when they want to get ME ingredients have to buy it from Arabs or Turks as we own most of those businesses in Europe. That is why Iranian migrants try to integrate so well but they are still never seen as locals but unwanted migrants. In the meantime Iran gets populated by illegal Afghan and Hazara migrants who increase the already sky-high crime levels!

Iranians are most and highest educated in western countries among immigrants.

Also let's not forget the earthquakes. Every single moment Iran can be very hard it. Nothing they can do almost to prevent it. The seismic activity will always be there. Sooner rather than later the ticking time bomb will explode.

Still better than 95% desert, we have mountains, alborz, 16th arable country in world.

 

[chickenmasala]

i rate this thread 10/10 informative too

 

[al-Hasani]

Farsis sharing genetics, history and achievements with Europeans? The only thing you share is a tiny number of barbarian nomads originating on the barren Pontic Steppe 3000 years ago who conquered the Iranian plateau and Persianized the locals and in the process getting civilized by us Semites - the founders of the first civilizations in our native ME - the cradle of civilization. That's all. Aside from that nothing.

You have no ties to Europeans at all. In fact Arabs overall are closer tied to Southern Europeans genetically, culturally and geographically. The Levant and Northern Africa has much more in common with Europe than Iran which borders Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Are you kidding me? We have the longest Mediterranean Coastline in the world. Don't forget that. KSA and Yemen alone has a longer coastline than you.

We Arabs ruled Iberia for almost 1000 years. We ruled Malta, Sicily, Southern Italy, Crete, Cyprus etc. You never ruled a single territory in Europe. We even ruled parts of Southern France.

Up to 20-25% of the entire Spanish and Portuguese vocabulary derives from Arabic.

Farsis contributed with nothing to Islam other than serving Arabs and collecting what Arabs already had made into works. That's all. Shia ISlam is as Arab as it can get.

LOL, Farsi migrants make up less than 5% of the GCC populations. Most of the migrants originating from Iran were Iranian Arabs who returned. Rest are migrants that can be kicked out anytime.

There are almost 500 million Arabs while there are 50 million of you Farsis. As I said it is like comparing a lion with a rat.

Arabs killed 1 million of you 25 years ago and destroyed you and changed your religion, culture, language, alphabet, founded dozens of cities, settled large areas of Iran, mixed with the locals and Arab influence is found everywhere in Iran. On every street corner. Let alone names etc.

Iranians on the other hand have only given prostitutes to the Arab world

The Arab world is 100 times more diverse than Iran. Our fertile areas alone are bigger than Iran. Iran is a dry country in drought and with few water resources. It has a bleak future.

Anyway for an marginal Arab colony for 1400 years there is little to brag about.

PS, you had no alphabet. You could not read or write before you encountered us. Nor did you live in cities but on the barren, flat and empty Pontic Steppe. Our native lands are home to the oldest cities on the planet.

Arab-Brazilians alone are more successful than the entire Iranian diaspora, LOL.

The world's richest man, Carlos Slim is an Mexican Arab.

Shakira one of the most popular female singers is an Colombian Arab.

Salma Hayek one of the most popular actors is an Mexican-Arab.

Steve Jobs one of the most popular businessmen in recent times and entrepreneur is the son of an Syrian Sunni Arab.

Arabs alone had 8 presidents in South America and even more Prime Ministers.

Iranians are no where to be seen in comparison. Well you are seen in the brothels of Dubai. Here the Arabs cannot compete indeed.

 

[INDIC]

I am missing mud throwing between @al-Hasani and @Surenas.

 

[al-Hasani]

I am missing mud throwing between @al-Hasani and @Surenas.

I am already discussing with 1 stateless Kurd. I don't need two. Anyway I am discussing with the double user of @Shapur Zol Aktaf . The same historical nonsense and arguments again and again.

 

[Iranwillrise]

I am missing mud throwing between @al-Hasani and @Surenas.

Let me educate this black habashi saudi child of african imported slaves

 

[al-Hasani]

Let me educate this black habashi saudi child of african imported slaves

Have you forgot who used slaves? It was us Arabs. We used you as slaves too.

Arab slave trade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Only the English can compete with us.

I believe that since Iran has been an Arab colony for 1400 years now and still hosts Pagans we as Arabs should be allowed to enslave them again.

I think that the Farsis can line up outside the Ali-Ridha shrine in long straight lines covered in black;

and wait for their Arab overlords.

The Basij will escort us if necessary and the Arab Islamic Republic of Iran will do its part as well. I heard that the Arab Islamic leaders of Iran executed two fire-worshippers last week?

 

[INDIC]

@rmi5 your comments surprised me a lot.

 

[Iranwillrise]

Farsis sharing genetics, history and achievements with Europeans? The only thing you share is a tiny number of barbarian nomads originating on the barren Pontic Steppe 3000 years ago who conquered the Iranian plateau and Persianized the locals and in the process getting civilized by us Semites - the founders of the first civilizations in our native ME - the cradle of civilization. That's all. Aside from that nothing.

No arabs share genetics, achievements and history with Indo-Europeans, not the persians or greeks or Armenians

The primitive arabs are using Indo-european civilization and technology, even our Indo-Iranian nummeral system. Sumerians were founders of civilization in Middle east, update your info son.

You have no ties to Europeans at all. In fact Arabs overall are closer tied to Southern Europeans genetically, culturally and geographically. The Levant and Northern Africa has much more in common with Europe than Iran which borders Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Are you kidding me? We have the longest Mediterranean Coastline in the world. Don't forget that. KSA and Yemen alone has a longer coastline than you.

No we persians have no ties with indo-europeans, but saudis have hwahahahahah.

The close similarities between Ancient Greek and Vedic Sanskrit suggest that both Proto-Greek and Proto-Indo-Iranian were still quite similar to either late Proto-Indo-European, which would place the latter somewhere in the late 4th millennium BC.

And what has long coastline to do with anything here, your country is 95% desert.

We Arabs ruled Iberia for almost 1000 years. We ruled Malta, Sicily, Southern Italy, Crete, Cyprus etc. You never ruled a single territory in Europe. We even ruled parts of Southern France.

Up to 20-25% of the entire Spanish and Portuguese vocabulary derives from Arabic.

So by these arguments saudis are related to Indo-Europeans and we Iranians are not,

Farsis contributed with nothing to Islam other than serving Arabs and collecting what Arabs already had made into works. That's all. Shia ISlam is as Arab as it can get.

Lets see.. your religion is partly Iranian, you know Quran has persian words (while your god/prophet denied it haha), Wudhu is zoroastrian concept, mahdi is saoshyant (zoroastrian), praying 5 times a day is zoroastrian and that you stole your religion from judaism (which was formed when jews lived under persian empire and were influenced by them).

80% of shia and sunni hadiths were written down by Persians else you would not know how to pray for example.
Persians wrote down hadiths so that habash slaves would be able to practice Islam. Hadiths are regarded by traditional Islamicschools of jurisprudence as important tools for understanding the Quran and in matters of jurisprudence.

The biggest and most important works on hadiths were made by Persians. You can see the top six and the most important rank the highest. Also read about the shia hadiths.
Kutub al-Sittah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Four Books - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Understanding of quran (tafsir, see point 3) is for great part based on hadiths.

2. The madhabs are based on hadiths, and at least 1 of them is founded by Persian Imam abu-hanifa. Hanafis are 30 to 45% of muslims worldwide and the biggest of the 4 sunni madhabs.
Hanbalis (saudi islam) are just 4% of muslims.
Hanafi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

3. Tafsir (understanding/explaining of quran) again for great part is based on Persian collected hadiths.
The early islamict tafsirs, major examples are;

• Tanwir al-Miqbas Known as (Tafsir Ibn Abbas); written by Abd-Allah ibn Abbas (d. 68/687).
• Tafsir al-Tabari; written by Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari
• Ma'alim al-Tanzil by al-Baghawi
• Al-Muḥarrar al-Wajiz by ibn Atiyyah
• Tafsir ibn Kathir by ibn Kathir
• Zad al-Masir by Abu'l-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi

Here Al-Tabari and Al-Baghawi are persians. And other major work on tafsir is done by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, a persian also. Ibn Kathir made also use of the tafsir of Al-Tabari.

This is what is written about the tafsir of Al-tabari:

Jami al-Bayan is an important source for attaining information about older commentaries which have not survived to the present. Its rich content which encompasses dictionaries, historical notes, law, recitation, theology and Arabic literature has made it a highly referenced book throughout history, creating a long list of editions. It is also a good example of reasoning in a tafsir by a widely accepted scholar, giving it a value of diraya.

It was marked by the same fullness of detail as his other work. The size of this work and the independence of judgment in it seem to have prevented it from having a large circulation, but scholars such as Baghawi and Suyuti used it largely; Ibn Kathir used it in his Tafsir ibn Kathir. Scholars including Suyuti have expressed their admiration towards this tafsir, regarding it as the most valuable of commentaries,[8] and most notably the words of Theodor Nöldeke;

If we had this book [fully] in our hands, we would not need anything else written after it”[9]

About early islamic shia tafsirs, almost all were done by persians.

5. Majority of ancient and medieval philosophers of Islam were Persians.
List of Muslim philosophers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Today without any hestiation we can say religion of islam is developed by Persians, so Islam is for biggest part persian, except the quran which comes from Allah , the purest arabic text (which still contains some persian words)

Source: Saudi bid to Iran, admission of defeat | Page 8

LOL, Farsi migrants make up less than 5% of the GCC populations. Most of the migrants originating from Iran were Iranian Arabs who returned. Rest are migrants that can be kicked out anytime.

Lets see
25% of Oman are Iranic baluchis, 1 in 4, I'm not talking about other (indo-)Iranians.

Bahrain: The Ajam are ethnic Persian Shias. Unlike the Baharna, Ajam are not ethnic Arabs. Shia Persians form large communities in Manama and Muharraq. Bahraini Persians maintain a distinct culture and language, but have long since assimilated into Bahraini culture; they tend to identify themselves as Persian Bahrainis than Iranians. 22% of Bahraini citizens are ethnic Persian Shias. Add to that the sunni Iranians (huwala). Many of Bahrain’s original population, the Baharna, aswell as many Emiratis, can lay claim to part Persian descent especially through a grandmother two to three generations back during the pre-oil era, which may qualify them as a new intermediate or mixed ethnic category in the future

Statistically, Qatar has one of the highest percentages of Iranians relative to its native
population, which one 1986 text stated as 23.29%. By 1939, the number of Persians had increased to about five thousand, or almost 20 percent of Qatar's population at that time.

Kuwait also has a considerable Iranian expatriate population in its midst, many of whom can trace their ancestry back to an Iranian immigration wave from nearby Basra in Iraq during the late 18th century. Use of Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) data to understand admixtures in each group reveals the following: the first group (Kuwait P) is largely of West Asian ancestry, representing Persians with European admixture; the second group (Kuwait S) is predominantly of city-dwelling Saudi Arabian tribe ancestry, and the third group (Kuwait B) includes most of the tent-dwelling Bedouin surnames and is characterized by the presence of 17% African ancestry.

There are almost 500 million Arabs while there are 50 million of you Farsis. As I said it is like comparing a lion with a rat.

290 million "arabs", mostly berbers who speak arabic now when you look at north africa. Adding other semitic languages, max 300 million.
Arabic language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now Iranian and Indo-Iranian languages
As of 2008, there were an estimated 150–200 million native speakers of Iranian languages.
The Indo-Iranian languages, or Indo-Iranic languages,[2][3] also known as the Aryan languages,[4] constitute the easternmost extant branch of the Indo-European language family.
It is also the largest branch, with more than 1 billion speakers stretching from Europe (Jasz) and the Caucasus (Ossetian) eastward to Xinjiang (Sarikoli) and Assam (Assamese) and south to Maldives (Dhivehi).
Indo-Iranian languages - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arabs killed 1 million of you 25 years ago and destroyed you and changed your religion, culture, language, alphabet, founded dozens of cities, settled large areas of Iran, mixed with the locals and Arab influence is found everywhere in Iran. On every street corner. Let alone names etc.

1000000 Iranians died in your dreams skinny arab.

It's so funny, babak khoramdin killed 100000 arabs according to historians in their times
Abu Muslim Khorasani killed 600000 arabs according to historians in that time

Then again not to mention how many umayads we killed together with help of abbasids and 2000000 arabs when we and mongols and Armenians, under rule and advice of Persian minister Naser al din Tusi opened baghdad.

Then we killed 500000 arabs during Iran-Iraq war.

Not to forget our militias and puppets in Iraq, Syria now, how many they killed? How many arabs got fucked when saddam decided to attack Iran, after that having no money invading brother kuwait, getting sanctioned and attacked by USA.

Iranians on the other hand have only given prostitutes to the Arab world

Biggest prostitutes are arabs among themselves who kill and rape each other, even in their refugee camps.

The Arab world is 100 times more diverse than Iran. Our fertile areas alone are bigger than Iran. Iran is a dry country in drought and with few water resources. It has a bleak future.

There is no unity or arab world, it's an artifical unity by language which does not exist. Your population is hungry and killing each other, from libya to Iraq and Yemen and Syria. Lool a saudi desert wanderer talking about Iranian Dryness. Comparing a moroccan with saudi is like comparing a chinese with someone from congo.

Anyway for an marginal Arab colony for 1400 years there is little to brag about.

Not bad that Iranians destroyed 3 arab empires (abbasids, fatimids, umayads), nothing to brag about.

PS, you had no alphabet. You could not read or write before you encountered us. Nor did you live in cities but on the barren, flat and empty Pontic Steppe. Our native lands are home to the oldest cities on the planet.

Yes we had Old Persian semi-alphabet with only 30 to 40 characters. Your native land is 95% desert, you were hunting rats and lizards till you invaded Iraq and encountered sumerians.

Arab-Brazilians alone are more successful than the entire Iranian diaspora, LOL.

Scientific output of sanctioned Iran only is bigger than that of whole artifical arab world. It's proven.

The world's richest man, Carlos Slim is an Mexican Arab. Shakira one of the most popular female singers is an Colombian Arab. Salma Hayek one of the most popular actors is an Mexican-Arab. Steve Jobs one of the most popular businessmen in recent times and entrepreneur is the son of an Syrian Sunni Arab. Arabs alone had 8 presidents in South America and even more Prime Ministers.

I've no time for mentioning *** shakers and carlos, no need to start about Iranian diaspora and their figures, everyone can google that. Steve jobs hated his arab father and if I'm not wrong shakira does not even speak arabic.

Iranians are no where to be seen in comparison. Well you are seen in the brothels of Dubai. Here the Arabs cannot compete

Arabs are mostly sons of prostitutes when reading about slavery, they mostly got children from slave women (black african women) for example, that's why we see so many black saudis and gulfies. It's sad that Iranian went there and made you race look better because 20 to 40% of Oman, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait are of Iranian descent. People should not thing that you are nice, gulfies and especially saudis are Fugly.

And now Syrian, Iraqi , Yemani arab girls are cheapest. 1 dollar for 60 kilogram. Not to forget the Palestinian land sellers lool.

By the way, 25 to 50% of saudi students are gays and 25% are raped according to saudi research.

 

[Charon 2]

[

Have you forgot who used slaves? It was us Arabs. We used you as slaves too.

Arab slave trade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Only the English can compete with us.

I believe that since Iran has been an Arab colony for 1400 years now and still hosts Pagans we as Arabs should be allowed to enslave them again.

I think that the Farsis can line up outside the Ali-Ridha shrine in long straight lines covered in black;

View attachment 128736 and wait for their Arab overlords.

The Basij will escort us if necessary and the Arab Islamic Republic of Iran will do its part as well. I heard that the Arab Islamic leaders of Iran executed two fire-worshippers last week?

The Arabs (Umayyads) got their vengeance for the enslavement of Turkics, Africans and Persians through the Mongol invasions. Are you butthurt because Hulagu Khan ended the Abbasid Caliphate? Oh but the Turkics saved your *** once again in the Battle of Ain Jalut don't worry! Stop your superior complexes. The Latin Arab Americans are fully assimilated into the Spanish and Protuguese culture of Latin America. They have nothing to do with Arabs but you can't understand that as a retarded Pan'-Semitist

 

[Iranwillrise]

[
The Arabs (Umayyads) got their vengeance for the enslavement of Turkics, Africans and Persians through the Mongol invasions. Are you butthurt because Hulagu Khan ended the Abbasid Caliphate? Oh but the Turkics saved your *** once again in the Battle of Ain Jalut don't worry! Stop your superior complexes. The Latin Arab Americans are fully assimilated into the Spanish and Protuguese culture of Latin America. They have nothing to do with Arabs but you can't understand that as a retarded Pan'-Semitist

Actually persian-shia-abbasid coalition wiped out the umayads (short lived arab nationalist empire) in battle of zab
Battle of the Zab - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What you mean is the destruction of abbasid empire by mongol and a coalition of armenian-georgian-persian-Turkic soldiers.
Siege of Baghdad (1258) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[al-Hasani]

[


The Arabs (Umayyads) got their vengeance for the enslavement of Turkics, Africans and Persians through the Mongol invasions. Are you butthurt because Hulagu Khan ended the Abbasid Caliphate? Oh but the Turkics saved your *** once again in the Battle of Ain Jalut don't worry! Stop your superior complexes. The Latin Arab Americans are fully assimilated into the Spanish and Protuguese culture of Latin America. They have nothing to do with Arabs but you can't understand that as a retarded Pan'-Semitist

Who called you? Should you not stick to Central Asia and Mongolia? Or are you just in love with me?

The barbarian and uncivilized Mongols actually killed many more Farsis. Some say that up to 50% of Farsis died.

Here you go, Mr. Wikipedia.

Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They also killed many Turks. They only ravaged Baghdad and parts of Syria. Other than that they did not succeed with more. Nor did they end anything. The Abbasid Caliphs continued to rule as Caliphs from Cairo.

Once again? LOL. Turks were irrelevant in early Islamic history and for almost the first 500 years. You must know the Arab-Turkish relations in that regard.

The Arabs of Latin America are Arabs regardless of them being South Americans now just like you Turks in Germany are still Turks. You are not a German and never will be one.

Besides many of those Arabs I mentioned are second-generation only and many of them are still able to speak Arabic and visit their ancestral lands.

Arab slaevery continued long after the Mongols. In fact 700 years longer than that. But you are just clueless as usual.


@WebMaster @Shapur Zol Aktaf is @Iranwillrise . Double users are not allowed.

Actually persian-shia-abbasid coalition wiped out the umayads (short lived arab nationalist empire) in battle of zab
Battle of the Zab - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What you mean is the destruction of abbasid empire by mongol and a coalition of armenian-georgian-persian-Turkic soldiers.
Siege of Baghdad (1258) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Abbasids were Arabs genius. They ruled Iran for a long time and are the longest ruling Caliphate. They also used Farsi slaves. Slavery was common back then. The rule of the day. Turks and Iranians also used slaves. Slavery in those two countries was first abolished in the 20th century.

Black Africans themselves were major slave owners and many African kingdoms profited from slavery. So it has nothing to do with skin color.

Afro-Iranians and Afro-Turks are both descendants of slaves just like Afro-Arabs.

 

[Iranwillrise]

@al-Hasani
Abbasids became puppets of persian buyids and turkic generals after 200 years. We played with them, blinded and killed some of them, we made some of them flee towards Iran (3/4 of these abbasid caliphs/kings were killed by Iranians). Buyids even cursed aisha and umar in Baghdad in front of Abbasid caliphs. Finally a coalition of mongols with turkic-persian-armenian-georgian soldiers put them out of their misery.

a perfect situation for the Buyid brothers; Ali and Ahmad conquered Khuzistan, while Hasan captured the Ziyarid capital of Isfahan, and in 943 capturedRay, which became his capital, thus conquering all of Jibal. In 945, Ahmad entered Iraq and made the Abbasid Caliph his vassal, and at the same receiving the honorific title of "Mu'izz al-Dawla", while 'Ali was given the title of "'Imad al-Dawla" ("Support of the State"), and Hasan was given the title of "Rukn al-Dawla" ("Pillar of the State").

 

[Charon 2]

Who called you? Should you not stick to Central Asia and Mongolia? Or are you just in love with me?

The barbarian and uncivilized Mongols actually killed many more Farsis. Some say that up to 50% of Farsis died.

Here you go, Mr. Wikipedia.

Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They also killed many Turks. They only ravaged Baghdad and parts of Syria. Other than that they did not succeed with more. Nor did they end anything. The Abbasid Caliphs continued to rule as Caliphs from Cairo and the Fatimids were still there.

Once again? LOL. Turks were irrelevant in early Islamic history and for almost the first 500 years. You must know the Arab-Turkish relations in that regard.

The Arabs of Latin America are Arabs regardless of them being South Americans now just like you Turks in Germany are still Turks. You are not a German and never will be one.

Besides many of those Arabs I mentioned are second-generation only and many of them are still able to speak Arabic and visit their ancestral lands.

Arab slaevery continued long after the Mongols. In fact 700 years longer than that. But you are just clueless as usual.


@WebMaster @Shapur Zol Aktaf is @Iranwillrise . Double users are not allowed.



Abbasids were Arabs genius. They ruled Iran for a long time and are the longest ruling Caliphate. They also used Farsi slaves. Slavery was common back then. The rule of the day. Turks and Iranians also used slaves. Slavery in those two countries was first abolished in the 20th century.

Black Africans themselves were major slave owners and many African kingdoms profited from slavery. So it has nothing to do with skin color.

Afro-Iranians and Afro-Turks are both descendants of slaves just like Afro-Arabs.

You are posting all the time articles from Wikipedia so you're the Wikipedia bitch not me

Turks were irrelevant in Islamic history? Lol what about Seljuks, Ottomans, Mughals, Timurids, Safavids or the Delhi Sultanate? Without Persians and Turks Islam wouldn't be the second biggest religion you moron. Arabs were only relevant in Islamic history as spreaders of barbarian sects like Wahabism which exists in its lowest form in the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria now.

Do any Latin Arab Americans speak Arabic? No because they are fully assimilated into the Spanish and Portuguese American countries. Your comparison with Turks is ridiculous. Any Turk in Germany can speak Turkish and the same will go for the future generations of Turks in Germany.

 

[xenon54 out]

Do any Latin Arab Americans speak Arabic? No because they are fully assimilated into the Spanish and Portuguese American countries. You comparison with Turks is ridiculous. An Turk in Germany can speak Turkish and the same will go for the future generations of Turks in Germany.

Lets be realistic, there are millions of 2nd and 3rd generation Turks with pretty broken Turkish, some cant even speak their mother language, my first three years of my school life was in Turkey so my Turkish is pretty good, even i can tell that many immigrant kids Turkish is funny to listen.