Invasion of India: Doc

[illusion8]

Of course it was a final term policy they used it in Africa, Asia, the ME but the people of India Pakistan Bangladesh would have been better under British rule now you guys have italian rule.

LOL that's the dumbest comment I ever read, the British ruled half the world at one point of time, so did a number of empires before them. They left because their time was up, they did not have any other choice. and about Italian rule then according to your logic due to Obama, the US is under African/Indonesian rule right?

 

[SamantK]

Not to mention build infrastructure get food to fund the empire, suppress the Muslim-Hindu conflicts. in long term South Asia would have been more stable under British then what it is today.

I do not feel so, there would have been more fighting, we would have become Afghanistan.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

LOL that's the dumbest comment I ever read, the British ruled half the world at one point of time, so did a number of empires before them. They left because their time was up, they did not have any other choice. and about Italian rule then according to your logic due to Obama, the US is under African/Indonesian rule right?

Nope but the whole thing was a joke.

I do not feel so, there would have been more fighting, we would have become Afghanistan.

no taliban.

 

[LeGenD]

Lol again check ur facts...... 100, 200 or 500 yrs wont make you locals. You were Invaders and will remain that.

This is extremely stupid assumption.

Do you think that entire Pakistani populace is of arab origin? That none of the natives embraced Islam?

nothing changes. By parting land you can not become Son of the soil. It is an arrangement made just 60yrs plus so that we live peacefully.

See above.

this partition was not based on History of Culture (sorry to bust ur bubble) but was purely based on religion. So you guys have no right to claim history and culture of past, Muhammad bin Qasim.
Past that period, everything belongs to us.

You like it or no, but it will remain forever.

What is next? Indus Valley Civilization only has historical relevance for modern age India and not Pakistan?

The relevancy of Two-Nation Theory was realized when Islam gained strong foothold in the subcontinent and had large following besides Hinduism.

Modern divisions do not change ancient cultures and customs. Tribal populace of Pakistan is living proof of this point.

 

[SamantK]

Nope but the whole thing was a joke.



no taliban.

taliban is the most recent.. USSR and America before them... it has continued

 

[SamantK]

This is extremely stupid assumption.

Do you think that entire Pakistani populace is of arab origin? That none of the natives embraced Islam?


See above.


What is next? Indus Valley Civilization only has historical relevance for modern age India and not Pakistan?

The relevancy of Two-Nation Theory was realized when Islam gained strong foothold in the subcontinent and had large following besides Hinduism.

Modern divisions do not change ancient cultures and customs. Tribal populace of Pakistan is living proof of this point.

If you read the whole thread you will notice that the majority of Indian posters too have said the same thing you just stated. However, the thread got extended just cause some guys claimed exclusive lineage to IVC..

 

[jayron]

In short the final product to say was that once great economic countries took a downturn.

average Indians are having a much better life now than it was during the British time. Millions of Indians died due to diversion of food during famine, creating deliberate divisions in the society for selfish political reasons, destroying the local economy by sabotage and dumping of British goods are just a few examples of Britishers misrule. India's share of world economy reduced from 20% to 0.2 % in a matter of 300 years. This was the reason India became so paranoid of western nations after independence and closed its economy.

With all the problems, Indians are still in control of their own destiny and will only improve with time, that without invading and looting other countries.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

I believe your Egypto German parent should have prevented the accident at right time

Positives - we would have faced a bit less troll on this forum..

Conclusion - Withdrawal at the right time really helps keeping earth clean of scumbags..

Aside from the personal attacks and insults do you really think is this necessary on a forum like this ?

average Indians are having a much better life now than it was during the British time. Millions of Indians died due to diversion of food during famine, creating deliberate divisions in the society for selfish political reasons, destroying the local economy by sabotage and dumping of British goods are just a few examples of Britishers misrule. India's share of world economy reduced from 20% to 0.2 % in a matter of 300 years. This was the reason India became so paranoid of western nations after independence and closed its economy.

With all the problems, Indians are still in control of their own destiny and will only improve with time, that without invading and looting other countries.

Thanks for the info & opinion.

taliban is the most recent.. USSR and America before them... it has continued

Mostly warlords however British India would have ensured that Afghanistan is in the western sphere of influence.

 

[RazPaK]

Bhartis are a confused lot.


Royal Gujjar character is a Gujjar. They are not indigenous to India, but since his people have converted to Hinduism they are the rightful owners of the history. Unless of course he is a chamar or a marasi. Hilarious.

Indians have an inferiority complex and it is evident everywhere.


Naming their country after a river in Pakistan.

Being on Pakistani websites.

Talking about history that is not theirs.

Talking about current affairs that are not theirs.

List goes on.

Calling all Pakistanis arabs just proves that their logic is flawed.

IVC sites are in Pakistan, not India.

It's funny to see how bhartis obsess about the past just to find some sort of connection to Pakistan. I've never seen such pathetic and self hating behavior in my life.

 

[jbond197]

@post 176
GTFO, you troll you get the answer..

 

[NeutralCitizen]

@post 176
GTFO, you troll you get the answer..

There is noting trolling about it just stick to the discussion without using personal attacks.

This is extremely stupid assumption.

Do you think that entire Pakistani populace is of arab origin? That none of the natives embraced Islam?


See above.


What is next? Indus Valley Civilization only has historical relevance for modern age India and not Pakistan?

The relevancy of Two-Nation Theory was realized when Islam gained strong foothold in the subcontinent and had large following besides Hinduism.

Modern divisions do not change ancient cultures and customs. Tribal populace of Pakistan is living proof of this point.

The Two Nation theory itself has failed both with the religious significance both with Bangladesh and the current situation in Pakistan. but was creating pakistan a mistake ?

 

[Contract Killer]

This is extremely stupid assumption.

Do you think that entire Pakistani populace is of arab origin? That none of the natives embraced Islam?


See above.


What is next? Indus Valley Civilization only has historical relevance for modern age India and not Pakistan?

The relevancy of Two-Nation Theory was realized when Islam gained strong foothold in the subcontinent and had large following besides Hinduism.

Modern divisions do not change ancient cultures and customs. Tribal populace of Pakistan is living proof of this point.

If one accepts the past well in its original form, well i have no objection in accepting him or her part of that history. But if some one false fully tries to claim entire history as his or her exclusivity and try to twist it as per his or her liking, then i have problem.

I agree, some natives embraced Islam, but that does not means that whole of the history only and only belongs to them. If they want to be part of those historical event, they have to accept it in its original form and even accept that there forefather were Hindus and they fought bravely against Alexandra.

Like wise we all can share our Historical commonality but then, lets accept it in real and original form.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

The Question is was creating pakistan a mistake ? many different opinions interesting to see what Jinnah would think of Pakistan if he were alive. not to mention the separation of Bangladesh showed alot of things.

 

[SamantK]

Mostly warlords however British India would have ensured that Afghanistan is in the western sphere of influence.

Keeping the geopolitics in mind, there would be a stronger and more violent resistance which would have created more terrorists than yo can even imagine, it would not be just because of Muslims, the Hindu factor would have been equal in measure.

Adding to the dangerous mix the hatred Britishers ignited in post-independent India.

 

[illusion8]

This is extremely stupid assumption.

Do you think that entire Pakistani populace is of arab origin? That none of the natives embraced Islam?


See above.


What is next? Indus Valley Civilization only has historical relevance for modern age India and not Pakistan?

The relevancy of Two-Nation Theory was realized when Islam gained strong foothold in the subcontinent and had large following besides Hinduism.

Modern divisions do not change ancient cultures and customs. Tribal populace of Pakistan is living proof of this point.

Most of Indian muslims are hindu converts, all of Bangladeshi muslims are converts as well, most of Pakistani populace let's say 90% are Hindu converts as well, though u do have some infusion of population from other lands. Any pre - partition history belongs to the greater India. Though the British ruled over parts of India you never heard them claiming history of the lands they ruled. Pakistan as a nation's history starts from 1947. A land known as India though ruled by various kings was in existence from many centuries. The British trading company that was formed in the 1700's was called The east India company - why was that? Columbus, Alexender, Vasco da gama, etc came looking for India. The french, Portuguese came looking for India. Nowhere in the annals of history is the word Pakistan mentioned before the 1940's. Porus was a hindu Indian king.