Invasion of India: Doc

[NeutralCitizen]

Keeping the geopolitics in mind, there would be a stronger and more violent resistance which would have created more terrorists than yo can even imagine, it would not be just because of Muslims, the Hindu factor would have been equal in measure.

debatable unless terrorists within a british india or in afghanistan with the hindu factor ?

 

[clmeta]

What are talking?? Pakistan is a 60 year old country. Before that it was India.
Jinnah had formed All India Muslim league not All Pakistan Muslim League.
Iqbal said hindi hain hum. watan hai???????????????Hindostan hamarah.

Bhartis are a confused lot.


Royal Gujjar character is a Gujjar. They are not indigenous to India, but since his people have converted to Hinduism they are the rightful owners of the history. Unless of course he is a chamar or a marasi. Hilarious.

Indians have an inferiority complex and it is evident everywhere.


Naming their country after a river in Pakistan.

Being on Pakistani websites.

Talking about history that is not theirs.

Talking about current affairs that are not theirs.

List goes on.

Calling all Pakistanis arabs just proves that their logic is flawed.

IVC sites are in Pakistan, not India.

It's funny to see how bhartis obsess about the past just to find some sort of connection to Pakistan. I've never seen such pathetic and self hating behavior in my life.

 

[SamantK]

debatable unless terrorists within a british india or in afghanistan with the hindu factor ?

My point being, the terrorism would not be just from the Muslims side but from the Hindu side as well. I am calling it terrorism but the more appropriate term would be freedom struggle (Terrorism against the British)

 

[NeutralCitizen]

My point being, the terrorism would not be just from the Muslims side but from the Hindu side as well. I am calling it terrorism but the more appropriate term would be freedom struggle (Terrorism against the British)

Of course but saying that if india was still controlled by the british they would do their best to try an stop otherwise it threatens their rule.

 

[Contract Killer]

Bhartis are a confused lot.


Royal Gujjar character is a Gujjar. They are not indigenous to India, but since his people have converted to Hinduism they are the rightful owners of the history. Unless of course he is a chamar or a marasi. Hilarious.

Indians have an inferiority complex and it is evident everywhere.


Naming their country after a river in Pakistan.

Being on Pakistani websites.

Talking about history that is not theirs.

Talking about current affairs that are not theirs.

List goes on.

Calling all Pakistanis arabs just proves that their logic is flawed.

IVC sites are in Pakistan, not India.

It's funny to see how bhartis obsess about the past just to find some sort of connection to Pakistan. I've never seen such pathetic and self hating behavior in my life.

You entire discussion is headless without any sense.

Its not Indians who have inferiority complex, but its you who is effected by it.

Indus valley civilization belongs to India and has been part of us till just 60 yrs back. We Indians live, breath and enjoy that very culture, where as you guys don't. so you can not claim it.

Your Identity and foundation of your Country is based on one specific religion, so in no way you can claim someones else religion and civilization .

Not all, but definitely you are Arab and not Punjabi. You are a true case of Identity crisis.

Again Pakistan does not have any history beyond 60 yrs. Its India/ Hindustan/ Bharat/ Aryavart to whom all history and historical evens belong. And we are the proud heir of that history.

From Alexandra to Muslim Invaders to Britishers all came to Bharat for its wealth. Pakistan was no where in there wild wild dream. lol

Unable to understand why you are so obsessed with our history, culture and civilization?

 

[SamantK]

Of course but saying that if india was still controlled by the british they would do their best to try an stop otherwise it threatens their rule.

That's when the violence starts, doesn't it?

You entire discussion is headless without any sense.

Its not Indians who have inferiority complex, but its you who is effected by it.

Indus valley civilization belongs to India and has been part of us till just 60 yrs back. We Indians live, breath and enjoy that very culture, where as you guys don't. so you can not claim it.

Your Identity and foundation of your Country is based on one specific religion, so in no way you can claim someones else religion and civilization .

Not all, but definitely you are Arab and not Punjabi. You are a true case of Identity crisis.

Again Pakistan does not have any history beyond 60 yrs. Its India/ Hindustan/ Bharat/ Aryavart to whom all history and historical evens belong. And we are the proud heir of that history.

From Alexandra to Muslim Invaders to Britishers all came to Bharat for its wealth. Pakistan was no where in there wild wild dream. lol

Unable to understand why you are so obsessed with our history, culture and civilization?

Give him a break man, he is too full to understand.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

That's when the violence starts, doesn't it?

of course any revolts or violent activities would be put down by force. but again it could play out in many different scenarios best leave it at that.

 

[SamantK]

of course any revolts or violent activities would be put down by force. but again it could play out in many different scenarios best leave it at that.

Atlast you agree

 

[LeGenD]

As the video described in he end, this history has been written by Greek historians. so obviously they would show Alexander in a positive light.
Alexander was defeated by Porus, and thts the reason he couldnt capture his kingdom, else it makes no sense asto why such a blood and power thirsty man would leave his battle won territory abandoned..
This is same like Chinese claiming that they won indian territory in 62 but abandoned it out of their heart change.. Bull crap.

And LOL at the Pakistanis, who would swear at Indians and hindus left and right, and 1 glorifying video about a great Hindu Indian king and all start lining up taking the credit..

Listen genius! It is not necessary for an invading force to lay claim to every piece of land where it ventures. Boundaries of the kingdoms have been decided on the basis of feasibility and political reasons.

Alexander defeated the ancestors of modern age Pakistan but left. Though Raja Porus put up considerable fight. Alexander already had conquered too much. He was exploring Afghanistan and Pakistan and surrounding regions.

China defeated India in 1962 as well but did not advanced in to India. Because this was a border dispute.

Porus was an Indian...and its not Indians who made this documentary...

Those with identity issues can cry a river..

Porus was an Indian... yeah...
Burn baby burnn...

Another genius here.

Porus was hindu for sure. But he is not a resident of modern age India.

Porus is one of the ancestors of natives of Punjab region of modern age Pakistan. Greeks called these natives 'people of the Indus'.

 

[Rafi]

Bhartis are a confused lot.


Royal Gujjar character is a Gujjar. They are not indigenous to India, but since his people have converted to Hinduism they are the rightful owners of the history. Unless of course he is a chamar or a marasi. Hilarious.

Indians have an inferiority complex and it is evident everywhere.


Naming their country after a river in Pakistan.

Being on Pakistani websites.

Talking about history that is not theirs.

Talking about current affairs that are not theirs.

List goes on.

Calling all Pakistanis arabs just proves that their logic is flawed.

IVC sites are in Pakistan, not India.

It's funny to see how bhartis obsess about the past just to find some sort of connection to Pakistan. I've never seen such pathetic and self hating behavior in my life.

LoL guess where these awesome historical artifacts are,

Bhartis are a confused lot.


Royal Gujjar character is a Gujjar. They are not indigenous to India, but since his people have converted to Hinduism they are the rightful owners of the history. Unless of course he is a chamar or a marasi. Hilarious.

Indians have an inferiority complex and it is evident everywhere.


Naming their country after a river in Pakistan.

Being on Pakistani websites.

Talking about history that is not theirs.

Talking about current affairs that are not theirs.

List goes on.

Calling all Pakistanis arabs just proves that their logic is flawed.

IVC sites are in Pakistan, not India.

It's funny to see how bhartis obsess about the past just to find some sort of connection to Pakistan. I've never seen such pathetic and self hating behavior in my life.

They can be obsessed as much as they want, but IVC and all the history belongs to us, their frustration and their rage is apparent in every post, but alas the history is in Pakistan.

 

[SamantK]

LoL guess where these awesome historical artifacts are,



They can be obsessed as much as they want, but IVC and all the history belongs to us, their frustration and their rage is apparent in every post, but alas the history is in Pakistan.

The history is in books which you did not read, not in the land..

 

[Pakistanisage]

Oh please.. Im glad that we got partitioned..

I think we need to make you gladder.

There is still 200 million Muslims in Northern and central India.

Just to show you how much we love to make you happier, I want a second Partition with Haryana, UP and Bihar being formed as Mughalistan. Being a full blooded Mughal from both sides of my family with ancestral roots in Dehli ( yes Dehli is how we pronounce that city in my family and not the Delhi version of some Dyslexic Britisher ) I would make Dehli as the Capital of my Mughalistan Empire.

 

[LeGenD]

If one accepts the past well in its original form, well i have no objection in accepting him or her part of that history. But if some one false fully tries to claim entire history as his or her exclusivity and try to twist it as per his or her liking, then i have problem.

I agree, some natives embraced Islam, but that does not means that whole of the history only and only belongs to them. If they want to be part of those historical event, they have to accept it in its original form and even accept that there forefather were Hindus and they fought bravely against Alexandra.

Like wise we all can share our Historical commonality but then, lets accept it in real and original form.

I do not have issue with this.

However, reality should be accepted. Porus was Raja of one of the ancient Hindu tribes that resided in modern age Pakistan near Indus river. He is separate from other Hindu tribes that resided in modern age India. The whole subcontinent was divided in to many tribes. Porus does not represents the whole subcontinent. The concept of unified Hindustan did not existed back then. Natives of Pakistani Punjab have legitimate claim over Porus.

 

[Dalai Lama]

ITT: Pakistanis cheesed about the usage of the word "India" and the fact that their version of history isn't parroted by The History Channel.

 

[SamantK]

I do not have issue with this.

However, reality should be accepted. Porus was Raja of one of the ancient Hindu tribes that resided in modern age Pakistan near Indus river. He is not an ancestor of other Hindu triber that resided in modern age India. The whole subcontinent was divided in to many tribes. Porus does not represents the whole subcontinent. The concept of unified Hindustan did not existed back then. Natives of Pakistani Punjab have legitimate claim over Porus.

and you are saying that those tribals remained like that till the modern Pakistan, no one from them moved anywhere? Present proof and then we can discuss otherwise I consider it bullsh!t