LeGenD
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,813
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Foreigners coin the world Hindustan for the whole subcontinent because this makes it easier for them to identify the people of the subcontinent.Most of Indian muslims are hindu converts, all of Bangladeshi muslims are converts as well, most of Pakistani populace let's say 90% are Hindu converts as well, though u do have some infusion of population from other lands. Any pre - partition history belongs to the greater India. Though the British ruled over parts of India you never heard them claiming history of the lands they ruled. Pakistan as a nation's history starts from 1947. A land known as India though ruled by various kings was in existence from many centuries. The British trading company that was formed in the 1700's was called The east India company - why was that? Columbus, Alexender, Vasco da gama, etc came looking for India. The french, Portuguese came looking for India. Nowhere in the annals of history is the word Pakistan mentioned before the 1940's. Porus was a hindu Indian king.
However, this does not changes the fact that subcontinent used to be as much divided in to different tribes or kingdoms as Europe has been and possibly more so.
All humans are related to each other in one way or other. Migration is part of human nature. Point here is about recognition of ancient inhabitants of Punjab region to whom Porus belongs and ruled. He does not represents the whole subcontinent.and you are saying that those tribals remained like that till the modern Pakistan, no one from them moved anywhere? Present proof and then we can discuss otherwise I consider it bullsh!t