Indian pressure on France stopped Thunder Upgrade WIKI leaks Very

[UKBengali]

Economic power does not lead to military power always. See countries like Sweden Finland Norway etc. Even if bdesh arms it self it cannot and will not be on par with India. If India has to defeat bdesh a naval blockade n border blockade will Leave you helpless and more over as you guys say RAW controls BD govt lol also other than loonies on PDF BD does not have any threat.

Sweden and the others you mention are tiny countries with less than 10 million people and so have low total GDPs, even though they have large GDP/capita.

You should do a little bit more research before making posts.

 

[Shadow_Hunter]

Economic power does not lead to military power always. See countries like Sweden Finland Norway etc. Even if bdesh arms it self it cannot and will not be on par with India. If India has to defeat bdesh a naval blockade n border blockade will Leave you helpless and more over as you guys say RAW controls BD govt lol also other than loonies on PDF BD does not have any threat.

Too much RAW intervention seems to have caused brain damage to our eastern neighbors.

 

[Zarvan]

There was a thread here saying that Pakistan has decided against J-10 as it wants to skip to 5th generation.

Search for it and you will see it.

Yes if we had huge money we would have gotten both but now we are waiting and preparing for 5th Generation

 

[me_itsme]

No I am not saying that China gave Pakistan the bomb.

You claimed that China would not arm Pakistan as it would mean that India would join the Western camp.

Well they dont really seem to care as they are arming Pakistan so much that you Indians even claim that China gave the bomb to them.

Anyway I have now had enough of you Indians as you are are mainly time wasters and not interested or capable of engaging in meaningful discussion.

btw - China offered J-10 fighter, their best home-made fighter, to Pakistan but now Pakistan is not interested as it wants to skip to 5th generation.

They do seem to care cause if they do t India and Pakistan might be fighting a war now for Kashmir. China also has enemies in her region so China do not want to cross line. US is not even our best friend but our defence relation is way way more than chi a and Pakistan. China arms North Korea too. Do you think Chinese will put Pakistani well being above themselves? They just want Pak to counter India but that seems to be fading away be cause China realise they want both India and Pakistan if they want to live peacefully and become more powerfull. Anyways the point is Pakistan cannot be on par with India on defence purchase with their current economy and state of their country and BD is not even in the picture

Guess

Sweden and the others you mention are tiny countries with less than 10 million people and so have low total GDPs, even though they have large GDP/capita.

You should do a little bit more research before making posts.

Guess BD is a very huge country with a bigger economy than India facing a lot of threats cause it is a super power and needs to Arm itself.

 

[OrionHunter]

I would love to see the hysteria that will overcome the Indians when the Chinese start selling the Pakistanis technology on a par with anything that Indians can buy.

That day is very near now.

Chinese technology at par with French tech? Jeez! Are you from Mars?

And I like the way you're still treating a country as your lord and master even after 45 years! High time you snap out of your inferiority complex! You are an independent country now!!

 

[Windjammer]

Who says anything about Pakistan matching India?

Pakistan just needs to be kept powerful enough to keep India in check in South Asia.
.

Indeed Pakistan doesn't need to match India, gun for gun, plane for plane or tank for tank, there's always been 4:1 quantity ratio in India's favour, Pakistan just maintains on qualitive edge.
In fact it's India which feels insecure on Pakistani acquirements, one just needs to look back when Pakistan purchased the initial 40 F-16s...... according to Indian author, Pushpinder Singh, as a response to the F-16s, India ended up purchasing some 250 assorted fighter jets.

 

[skynet]

Indeed Pakistan doesn't need to match India, gun for gun, plane for plane or tank for tank, there's always been 4:1 quantity ratio in India's favour, Pakistan just maintains on qualitive edge.
In fact it's India which feels insecure on Pakistani acquirements, one just needs to look back when Pakistan purchased the initial 40 F-16s...... according to Indian author, Pushpinder Singh, as a response to the F-16s, India ended up purchasing some 250 assorted fighter jets.

Pakistan neither have quantitative nor qualitative superiority

 

[Otocal]

Indeed Pakistan doesn't need to match India, gun for gun, plane for plane or tank for tank, there's always been 4:1 quantity ratio in India's favour, Pakistan just maintains on qualitive edge.
In fact it's India which feels insecure on Pakistani acquirements, one just needs to look back when Pakistan purchased the initial 40 F-16s...... according to Indian author, Pushpinder Singh, as a response to the F-16s, India ended up purchasing some 250 assorted fighter jets.

The Mirage 2000 was a reactionary buy to F-16 purchase by Pakistan

50~ Mirage 2k were bought not 250.

 

[Windjammer]

Pakistan neither have quantitative nor qualitative superiority

Decisively proven by the PAF in the last two major wars. Period.

 

[Capt.Popeye]

The Mirage 2000 was a reactionary buy to F-16 purchase by Pakistan

50~ Mirage 2k were bought not 250.

Shhh, ab chup oye. Modern Maths mein ginti alag hota hai...........do not break the bags of wind even though you are factually correct on this point.
Eventually it was use of the Fulcrums and Mirages which led to the PAF developing cold-feet in 1999. Check A/Cdre Kaiser 'Aeronaut' Tufail on this.

 

[Windjammer]

India also built the nuclear bomb in response to Pakistan's bomb. Or wait, was the other way round?

Must you always talk out of context.

 

[Shadow_Hunter]

Shhh, ab chup oye. Modern Maths mein ginti alag hota hai...........do not break the bags of wind even though you are factually correct on this point.
Eventually it was use of the Fulcrums and Mirages which led to the PAF developing cold-feet in 1999. Check A/Cdre Kaiser 'Aeronaut' Tufail on this.

Exactly. Pakistanis somehow think that they have bridged the gap to IAF in last two decades. Non upgraded Fulcrums and Mirages were enough to make them piss in their pants in 1999. Now we have upgraded versions of them, along with 200 odd MKIs, bridged the gap, indeed.

Must you always talk out of context.

You are the one talking out of context here. I am simply rectifying your mistakes. I have to do that since you are incapable of doing that yourself.

 

[Otocal]

Shhh, ab chup oye. Modern Maths mein ginti alag hota hai...........do not break the bags of wind even though you are factually correct on this point.
Eventually it was use of the Fulcrums and Mirages which led to the PAF developing cold-feet in 1999. Check A/Cdre Kaiser 'Aeronaut' Tufail on this.

The specific incident when PAF refused to actively engage during Kargil was when our Mig-29 ( Fulcrum ) got a BVR lock on a F-16. At that time F-16 did not have BVR. This single incident i believe kept the conflict to a skirmish level and not full scale war.
After air warfare breaks out naval warfare would have followed.

@Windjammer This is BVR incident

 

[Windjammer]

The Mirage 2000 was a reactionary buy to F-16 purchase by Pakistan

50~ Mirage 2k were bought not 250.

Add to that the Fulcrum, and i don't want to be accused of animal abuse...... Kaiser Tufail was talking about an incident involving a BVR lock on or something but how we conveniently ignore the incident when tables turned.

Exactly. Pakistanis somehow think that they have bridged the gap to IAF in last two decades. Non upgraded Fulcrums and Mirages were enough to make them piss in their pants in 1999. Now we have upgraded versions of them, along with 200 odd MKIs, bridged the gap, indeed.

It's you Bhartis who shi** in their dhotis even when Pakistan acquires some second hand f-16s, just look within to understand the psyche.

You are the one talking out of context here. I am simply rectifying your mistakes. I have to do that since you are incapable of doing that yourself.

If you were that capable, you wouldn't be gloating..... your kind only learn.

 

[xyxmt]

What about shitting!!! it's All about diplomatic credibility &power which india enjoys over its partners so we used it its you people who are Crying about it. if you got diplomatic credibilty or power you are free to stop india-us arms trade I bet you cannotpp even in the case of Chinese

then what are you gloating about, a large number of other countries have more diplomatic credibility than India, tiny UAE has more diplomatic credibility than India...and its called having money, credibility my nuts.
Why cant India stop China for working in Pakistani Kashmir, show some credibility here will you.
why does india has no say in afghan matters...no credibility??
show some credibility and stop US from supplying everything to Pakistan, because US gives crap about you 2 billions?
Show some credibility and stop china from supplying any weapons to Pakistan.
show some credibility and stop Russian from now selling weapons to Pakistan.
once you have signed the rafael deal then show some credibility even with French