Indian Media Discloses Dismal Performance of SU-30MKI Fighters During Kashmir Skirmish

[Daghalodi]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Who cares what you think or what you see?

The real part is Indians blew up their own Mi17 killing 6 IAF personel and till date they can't find the black box.

I think that pretty much clears it up.

 

[Vapnope]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

- Did you even see the radar picture by IAF? JF17s were on the front.
- F16 were 45km from Pair of Su30s, how that makes su30s out of range?
- We lost 2 AMRAAM (Not in true sense) and we are happy about it

You are French so what? Doesnt change the facts.

 

[Dac O Dac]

A friend of mine, @BonPlan, was banned for trying not to speak in the pak way...
Is it your sole way of answering ?

 

[Daghalodi]

A friend of mine, @BonPlan, was banned for trying not to speak in the pak way...
Is it your sole way of answering ?

You should try Bharat Ratsh!t forums. Where your kind vomits filth and bans anyone who doesnt believe the Jokes Bharatis Invent

 

[Dac O Dac]

- Did you even see the radar picture by IAF? JF17s were on the front.

It is your front line fighter, but maybe in the air during this fight, but not on the first line.

- F16 were 45km from Pair of Su30s, how that makes su30s out of range?

AMRAAM C no escape zone is 20 to 25km. Against an agile target as a Su30MKI it was a forseeable loss.

 

[GumNaam]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Pak propaganda.
If your are not able to face the truth, you will never win.

1. it was the Mirages that had long range stand of weapons, the JF17s were flying deep inside your bunghole & even had your m2000s locked but weren't permitted to shoot until the m2000s crossed the loc, good for the m2000 pilots that they didn't cross, they must've heard of the hospitality your abhi-the-none-done received, answer fellas.
2. can you guess which one of your "i ain't flyin" aircrafts this one killed?

3. you're about as french as the french fries masala sold on the streets of kolkata!

 

[paritosh]

So an Air Force twice the size of the PAF attacked Pakistan without ensuring adequate numbers? A lack of planning no?

The fact that F-16 succeeded in pushing back SU-30s in order for Mirages and JF-17s to perform their strike missions does not make you think?

Literally no one outside a niche Indian Twitter following believes the F-16 fantasy, and even some of them are admitting it is BS.

This is not a smart assessment of the capability differential that exists between IAF and PAF. Firstly, the numerical difference isn’t that great to ensure full CAP coverage all the time. Secondly, serviceability issues ensure that only a proportion of the available fleet is armed and operational. It is easy to assess gaps in patrol patterns (india and Pakistan have crystal clear views of each other’s airspace thanks to our proximity) and overwhelm with numbers.
I don’t think that either airforce can achieve any level of superiority unless the longevity of the airbattle becomes a factor, or one of our airforces makes a quantum leap in tech and gets fifth gen assets (along with the necessary systems integration).

 

[Yasser76]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Pak propaganda.
If your are not able to face the truth, you will never win.

You know, if you continue to come on here and post lies, despite them being debunked by every known global expert, your shelf life on this forum will be measured like an Indian MIG. Funny thing is Pakistani "propoganda" always seems to come up with evidence (videos. wreckage etc) Indian "facts" just reply on the words of people on the internet.

This is not a smart assessment of the capability differential that exists between IAF and PAF. Firstly, the numerical difference isn’t that great to ensure full CAP coverage all the time. Secondly, serviceability issues ensure that only a proportion of the available fleet is armed and operational. It is easy to assess gaps in patrol patterns (india and Pakistan have crystal clear views of each other’s airspace thanks to our proximity) and overwhelm with numbers.
I don’t think that either airforce can achieve any level of superiority unless the longevity of the airbattle becomes a factor, or one of our airforces makes a quantum leap in tech and gets fifth gen assets (along with the necessary systems integration).

Sure, I agree somewhat, and PAF does probably have better serviceability then IAF if reports about the SU-30 serviceability rate are true.

In modern war one of the key elements is getting all your assets in the right place at the right time, as you point out, one simply does not need a massive advantge. In modern networked warfare information s key. Rather then flying CAPs all over Pakistan, PAF was able to must a decent number of fighters exactly where then were needed and exactly when they were needed. This was probably the most significant achievment of Feb 27th, more so then shooting down the MIG-21

 

[Daghalodi]

You know, if you continue to come on here and post lies, despite them being debunked by every known global expert, your shelf life on this forum will be measured like an Indian MIG. Funny thing is Pakistani "propoganda" always seems to come up with evidence (videos. wreckage etc) Indian "facts" just reply on the words of people on the internet.


Sure, I agree somewhat, and PAF does probably have better serviceability then IAF if reports about the SU-30 serviceability rate are true.

In modern war one of the key elements is getting all your assets in the right place at the right time, as you point out, one simply does not need a massive advantge. In modern networked warfare information s key. Rather then flying CAPs all over Pakistan, PAF was able to must a decent number of fighters exactly where then were needed and exactly when they were needed. This was probably the most significant achievment of Feb 27th, more so then shooting down the MIG-21

Its Funny how Indians have to claim they are not Indians to prove their point because even Indian trolls know Being Indian means zero credibility.

 

[Raider 21]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Pak propaganda.
If your are not able to face the truth, you will never win.

....as far as I'm concerned what the French should host is an invasion...
- Johnny English, 2003

Above was on a lighter note. Facts remain that an Indian Su-30MKI claim, an Indian helo friendly fire kill, an Indian MiG-21 confirmed kill. No F-16s have been lost.

Victory is to those who think of it, and a confirmed kill is always a delight to those who have achieved it. See what the l'escadrons have to say about it.

Salut !!!

 

[crankthatskunk]

Delusions. You had victory in a battle we decided not to fight.

Really!!

So a day before when you send down your bombers with the most devastating weapons you have purchased from Israel , you were thinking peace not war with Pakistan!!

If you didn't decide to fight, why did you sent packages to intercept the Pakistani jets!!
Were they came to do "Bollywood's Dance Number"".

Why you put your brains in your arses when you comment!!!

 

[Aslan]

Sei Italiano fra ?

Italian, read it, and heard it when was watching the documentary on one of Caesars wars.

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Pak propaganda.
If your are not able to face the truth, you will never win.

Your number on Pakistani losses are not correct that the problem, Pakistan in total lost the following;
- some trees
-lots of Jet fuel
-Some H4's
-AMRAMS
-and a cup of tea
-Oh I almost forgot the poor crow

 

[Ichigo]

I'm just french. You agree or not is not my problem.

Reality is that your so famous JF17 were far away the battle,
The sole potent fighters in the PAF inventory are the now old F16,
You fired the AMRAAM out of their range, in a shy attitude. Seems that an AMRAAM cost very few for you !
India lose a mig 21 and PAF a F16. End of the story.
I see no victory, nor for PAF nor for IAF.

Pak propaganda.
If your are not able to face the truth, you will never win.

i am damn sure u are an indian. With ur logic and ur final conclusion of the story its hard to say otherwise.... not sure since wen french ppl started with bollywood logic... go check again the whole story and use the lil brain of urs to comprehend the whole event but for tat, u must not be a baniya to begin wid else u always will end up with same result...
one suggestion, at least learn make a case in a way that doesn't sound like horse crap....

i give a rats --- if u r french or indian but false flagging just to get some standing is one damn cheap way... ur brain farts gives it all away and than u go in denial mode...

F16 claim u accept (where their is not a single evidence) and Su30 claim u deny (which was even reported by indian media) ... stupid logic, just to even out stuff.... u have to learn alot before faking ur flag to stay afloat...

Also, indian origin french citizen doesnt cut it. if tats ur reasoning.

 

[Areesh]

Indians again proving that they are clowns with their posts on thread

We already acknowledge that you guys are clowns. Why prove it again and again?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

we didn't want Pak to get any spotlight

That didnt work, "tea is fantastic" now a global meme.

The sukois were asked not to engage.

PAF deliberately bomb around the Indian military installation, release the footage of one of its SOWs onboard camera clearly showing Indian army depo in its cross hair, Indian AVM on camera admitting Pakistani actions as "act of war".

If you are to be believed with your utterance, only one word comes into mind..... COWARDS.