What's new

Indian forces kill 3 more Kashmiris as fresh protests erupt

Re-read your post, you questioned our leaders credibility, i am questioning yours to implement a referendum, it will never happen.


Referendum should be conducted by a neutral international body. Agree?

He is a rajput no Sikh

Rajnath Singh is rajput

You not even know our demographic


Did I say anything about Rajnath?
 
.
Is that the topic of discussion here?




Didn't resolutions come after that?

Yes after Nehru UN to mediate

UNSC adopted Resolution 47



The resolution is not valid now
After the violation of Pakistan
 
.
A Rajput can kill innocent people or cheer killing of innocent people because?.......he is Rajput?

Yes after Nehru UN to mediate

UNSC adopted Resolution 47



The resolution is not valid now
After the violation of Pakistan


Who declared it invalid?
 
.
Referendum should be conducted by a neutral international body. Agree?




Did I say anything about Rajnath?

Talk referendum later first

Comply on the fist part of UN resolution leave AJK as soon as possible
 
. .
Wouldn't it require a commitment from India to leave Kashmir as well?

Would n't require same from Pakistan who was aggressor as per UN resolution 47

And multiple times violated LOC in 65 & 1999
 
. .
indian minister came to attend summit, he doesn't even know the ethics n between LEFT, not even an illiterate person leave the summit in this way, thats the ethics learnt by the world most racist crowd, they must have courage to listen facts n truth not only brutally kill innocents in Kashmir.
 
.
indian minister came to attend summit, he doesn't even know the ethics n between LEFT, not even an illiterate person leave the summit in this way, thats the ethics learnt by the world most racist crowd, they must have courage to listen facts n truth not only brutally kill innocents in Kashmir.

He is a realistic, no point of talking to a brick wall, its fruitless, it was a formality only... furthermore love the media blackout - Shameless #hosts
 
.
Shall we let people of land to decide who was the aggressor? Let them judge this instead of anyone from outside. Sounds fair?
Double standard it was UN words not Is

People come and go constitution remain same they decided there narrative in 1956 by construction of J&K constitution

A constitution is soul of democracy
It's universal law applicable anywhere

Isn't that what your Govt do in Baluchistan and Sindh
 
. .
Shall we let people of land to decide who was the aggressor? Let them judge this instead of anyone from outside. Sounds fair?

Shall we let the people of planet earth decide who is their headache, cancer and ailment. one word Pakistan!
 
. .
That's the argument you can come up with? You don't people of Kashmir should decide what they want?

Get out Kashmir first then we can debate the rest till then don't build castles on a seashore
 
.
Double standard it was UN words not Is

People come and go constitution remain same they decided there narrative in 1956 by construction of J&K constitution

A constitution is soul of democracy
It's universal law applicable anywhere

Isn't that what your Govt do in Baluchistan and Sindh


Constitution is not soul of democracy. People are. Especially if constitution did not afford them right to determine their future. So in a democracy, shouldn't people get to choose?

Get out Kashmir first then we can debate the rest till then don't build castles on a seashore


Will you get out of Kashmir then?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom