KalaGhoda
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 400
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Nonsense cause we shall have at least half of it, i think its fair enough.
LoL...ogay sweetie, it's fair. come and take it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nonsense cause we shall have at least half of it, i think its fair enough.
They are deveolping the relevant products, it is not even close to success yet. If even one of those aformentioned product will be bought from the shelf overseas, go kill your self ASAP. You are so fast to forget the trauma if you once had. wait and see. India can't make the carrier standard steel unless the Russians sell it to you. Don't lie!
We should induct one aircraft carrier every five years.
The semi-finished hull is floating there for so many years, hope it won't get rusty before year 2019. Typical Indian way of doing things.
No surprise, delay, low efficiency, hyper, bought.
If the Russia don't provide you the steel, you can't even make a mockup of it. Please use the word 'indigenous' carefully. ram? CIWS? fighter jets? propulsion? radar? control units? tell me which one you can produce indigenous?
Please take care of the boiler this time, don't blame China fire bricks any more.
According to my previous experience of Indians' efficiency, this one can't be completed until year 2022.
actually he offend me first.Edited.
@wanglaokan dude you are crazy. Just for god sake come out clear for once and for all. you want cooperation and friendship with india or like to troll as above
She is going to be a beauty:
As @Mike_Brando has stated the IAC-1 will have a gun-based CIWS, the BARAK-2 LR-SAM and possibly the BARAK-1 CIWS. Having said that the IN follows the USN/Western concept wherein the firepower lies in the CBG as such the IAC (and Viky) will have P-15A Kolkata Class destroyers (in the future P-15Bs), P-17 Shivlaik Frigates (in the future P-17As) or Talwar class frigates as well as ASW P-28 Corvettes, SSKs and support ships like Deepak Class FRS. The-P-15A/P-15B, P-17/P-17A and IAC-1 will all have the BARAK-2 LR-SAM.
(note the P-15A/B, P-17/A and Talwar Classes all will be carrying a serious number of Brahmos cruise missiles also)
The P-15A, P-17A and IAC-1 will be equipped with the EL/M-2248 MF-STAR, the P-15Bs, P-17As and IAC-1 will also have the RAN-40L Volume Search Radar which will arguably be one of the most capable sensor compliments on the high seas. This is all before we talk about the air wing incorporating fighters, advanced AW helos (S-70B) and AEW helos. All in all a devastatingly deadly CBG.
can anyone write the details of SAM's and Anti-ship missiles system used in Vikrant ?
Yeah yeah- blame the company that came up with the renders! Other than that oversight she is looking to become a a fine ship indeed.Naval F 15s ?
Again bro, It is unlikely Russian CIWS (AK-630) will be onboard- the IN is looking to get a new gen gun-based CIWS to replace their old Russian (AK-630) CIWS and the hunt is on:Air defence will likely consist of Barak SAMs and Russian CIWS guns
actually he offend me first.
Good and what about aircraft it will carry ? Tejas N MK1 / MK2 ?
For control and supremacy over Indian Ocean Region (for all economic/trade benefits or for military purpose) how only 90 bird capability would be enough?
It's such a shame the IN is so secretive of the progress of their vessels, we only rarely get to see updates in construction. Contrast this with the QE Class ACCs being built for the RN where the makers of the ships (BAE) are giving weekly updates (along with pics) of the construction work.
Against whom??? There is not a single country in that region, that will pose a threat to IN, that would even require a single carrier in the first place, because our surface fleet is growing fast in numbers and capabilities, just as the reach of our shore based aircrafts is.
And not the number of aircrafts on the carrier are important, but what capability the aircrafts provide. A super carrier with 90 N-LCAs will still lose against a medium class carrier with 30 x Rafales. So there is more to consider than just having the carrier capability in the navy, it's size or the number of fighters.
That is correct Sancho and thats why the question is 3 ACC enough?
Second its true that shore based capacity is increasing but that does not imply we can load our IACs with limited reach birds.
The size is not important for what fighters we will use, but the take off system. If the US sells us catapults, Migs, N-LCA and N-FGFA are out of question. If they don't and we will build just a bigger IAC1, Migs, N-LCA and N-FGFA could be used again.Again IAC 2 had been speculated to be 65000 tonnes but no credible information to confirm that. If its really 65K do you forsee just Mig 29k/LCA N mix you suppose the tonnage implies some other medium weight birds like Rafale N is in the mix. What other aircrafts do you suppose may fit such a scheme?