At least we compare BD with India, a country 8 times bigger in pop and 24 times bigger in land area.
Why does size matter for comparison anyway? We are not comparing in absolutes of some fanciful total power/size, we are comparing per capita....and even more specifically here issues (corruption, credibility, transparency) that are not largely tied to gross or per capita wealth/output either.
Some of the most wealthiest and productive countries in the world are several times smaller than BD. There are much poorer and smaller countries than BD that do a LOT better when it comes to corruption, credibility and thus sustainability as well.
We don't compare ourselves with Somalia or Sierra Leon.
Thats a pretty interesting low bar, you are saying comparing India with BD is like comparing BD with anarchist run places in subsaharan africa.
What happens when you compare BD to countries like Pakistan, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka....and a large myriad of subsaharan countries when it comes to institutional capacity+development and corruption level?
Tiny impoverished East-Timor can accept an ESCAP assessment on its national statistics and thus take a huge first step to improving itself on that front....but BD strangely doesn't (and I really don't want to tell you how many times in a row either, its not nice reading, just like the tariffs BD has put on all kinds of easy non-RMG industry),.... that too at its grossly diminshed capacity level (which has nothing to do with a country's size whatsoever). You understand how this plays a role in graduation to SDDS long term for just one example? (Again nothing to do with BD's population size)
Why does BD do far far worser on those? Why do BD people accept that as a given and not try to change it? They would really rather vent against India and Pakistan for whatever blah blah blah....and accept whatever the BD govt claims development wise in this atrocious credibility....verbatim and for feel good....I mean I guess stuck in a paddy field or RMG sweatshop gives lot of idle mind to cling to dreamthink to feel better.....just like I suppose a 7 km/hr crawl in a "capital" "city" does.
But still why not try fix that which can be fixed that needs no immense wealth permeation or grand size of country? Or simply cling to the comfort of status quo I guess and buffer it with the feel good groupthink, I guess that is much easier to do....its not like BD people really are great at becoming productive and achieving solid transition.....I mean look at what ppl like bigmouth billu
@Bilal9 earn on average even when they go to a developed country. Mass chotolok permeation in mind, body and soul it seems.
But here Indians like to compare their super power to a country which is 24 times smaller and started as a basket case 40 years back.
Actually lately its always a BD bugger starting that now and getting reamed on it inevitably. Cpl recent examples:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/glob...ngladeshis-use-internet.549473/#post-10348135
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/unes...e-high-of-72-76-in-2016.549730/#post-10344183
If you dont want the sound hiding, best to stay focused and humble and not drag betters in to begin with.
That whole concept of getting from GDDS to SDDS basically (which is a headstrong thing much much more than a wallet thing), before you start opening the mouth for some feel good notion to harness a david and goliath dream complex.
Go compare yourselves with China or something....and forget BD sometimes.
India and China largely rank equal in what we are talking about here specifically (SDDS category, corruption, statistical capacity and credibility). On other matters (related, derived or not) we sure do compare all the time but also understand where the comparisons limits are given a myriad of issues and priorities well beyond the scope of cherrypick trolling that goes on in this forum 99% of the time.
But again suggestions about this are funny coming from someone from a country that refuses to even improve to that level of overall category, capacity and credibility....and then deflecting to that somehow being tied to the absolute size/reach or whatever of a country....and then such people routinely permeating and promoting and worst of all instigating whatever effluent from orifice claim comes from that terrible credibility (for feel good group think, instead of trying to reach a rough parity on that crediblity first with whatever big or small guy you wanna compare with)....one that again is a national ethos/pastime it seems with a 3 million hoax as raison d'etre politically even fake-spiritually to begin with.
Thats always going to be an eternal loser chotolok argument. The way you lot cry when called out on that just adds to it even more.
Improve your hunger index so your people less less hungry compared to North Korea or Burundi.
Yeah of course North Korea, maybe the one country thats even worse credible than BD....and routinely exposed on it (because interested parties actually care about exposing the dissonance on paper and reality, unlike some RMG sweatshop and paddy swamp tucked away in some armpit).
And what about Burundi?
http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Country/Details#Burundi
I don't get why you pick such places in some triggered reaction....one ranks nowhere because of the paucity of data to begin with, one ranks dead last.
And where does BD rank? Worse than Rwanda....even with the terrible credibility of BD claims. Again where exactly does the gross size of a country factor into this stuff in any meaningful way? What is the R^2 value if we map land size to say HDI for every country in the world?
So again, use your (faulty) argument on yourself first and THEN work on figuring out why it could be faulty....before you use it on others.
