gslv mk3
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2012
- Messages
- 13,840
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How close to Pakistani coast,will the Aircraft carrier operate,and how will the aircraft reach within 250 kms of the aircraft carrier evading detection ?
Well still need a video of the Cm-400 missile to know if it was ever tested.
Well IAF bombing on tiger hill and on the supply lines was more than enough. But you still don't understand that the aerial recon flown by the Jags helped in accurate shelling on the Pakistani NLI positions (I deliberately called them NLI because it is an insult to every soldier there who fought there to satisfy some Generals ego as a Mujahid/******). When the PAF realized this they sent the PAF F 16s to intercept the Jags but when the MiG 29s showed up and after 2 incidents the PAF was effectively grounded because of fear of losing the most potent aircraft in their inventory and lack of spares as you were under sanctions from the US for the Nuclear tests.
The only person crying here is the fanboy in you.
I see that the awful itch in your rear has yet to be soothed...
Yeah,Last time fanboy brought the Nasr battlefield range missile into discussion about GSLV ,Now he want to bring Chinese DF 21 to discussion about INS Vikrat....so long fanboy
What did I say,We are developing LCA by taking time,meanwhile you can take time in developing a basic trainer aircraft,And oh,meanwhile we are developing a flying wing UCAV
Then why should china downplay the range then?RAN 40 L radar on the Aircraft itself has a range of 400km(or that is what is available in public)
You are trying to deviate from the point,I said India have good experience with non Russian weapons,and my points prove it
And yes,Kargil-do you think the role of a multirole fighter is just Air to Air ?It proved its mettle in high altitude conditions.What about Gnats?evenStarfighter fell prey to those tiny jets!
How do you think that it is as better as AMRAAM then?Even China still operates R 73 and R 77,IAF is still inducting the same while having Python V and Derby.What does that prove?
Boasting about a Chinese developed weapon system like Pakistan had developed it...So typical.Do you remember the last time you got your *** kicked?
Yes, that's where you went wrong.We don't want recaps. Desist from looking like a complete fool.
As I said, what's the point when our supplier is dependable and produces them cheaper then even we can?
What Radar and on what Aircraft? What is the relation b/w the 2?
Not just A2A but A2A is the focal point of attention today as both sides have AWACS that can effectively detect Jets taking off from forward bases of the other country. So most Jets/Bombers will have to face the Air Force of the other country and defeat it before any actual bombing mission is possible. A2G such as those that have a range effective enough to be launched within the airspace would be the only safe bet.
Where did I ever even attempt to say that it was better then AMRAAM? I said it is almost as good, perhaps upto 80% as good as the earlier versions of AMRAAM.
No, we have short memories. But we do remember when our 7 times larger enemy amassed almost a million troops at our border and could not dare move 1 inch across! We also remember how India withdrew from the border unconditionally and unilaterally, and in the process lost quite a few soldiers.
the keel was laid in February 2009
You have to prove that the indian steel mills could supply before that time
Inquiries revealed the process has taken about 10 years. In 1999, the navy procured the formula for a grade of the metal called ABA steel from Russia. The navy was using the metal for its warships — many of which were and are on order in Russia. The navy then handed it over to the DMRL.
“That gave us the chemistry but it did not tell us how we can produce it,” says Malkondaiah
see my % allocation of the importance of different sections of the vessel where steel are required
because the Russians were mentioned in numerous reports to supply you specialised steel which at the time of signing the contract, indian steel makers were unable to produce
Steel forms the major part of the hull and the most important material to make it
True but as I said the structure blueprints (including relevant manuals / handbooks) plus good testing equipment will do the analysis
There is no answer to confrim because the indians expenditures are focused on your new AC while Gorshkov refit is a secondary ac by default
But if there are technical / design problems that prop up during your seatrial and operation then Gorshkov will gain its importance in the fleet
Getting the block of iron to the stage of sailing it at high sea beautiflly at 30 knots with appropriate equipment for fighter jets' operating on it is marvellous engineering job
It is as demanding if not more because the flexibilities are much less than building from scratch
that is cheerleaders' viewpoint
Even the blinds can see a rusty floating ironblock that was once towed by tugboats is completely transformed into a self-powered 60K ton aircraft carrier that can navigate to the Pacific.
we have some parts which are sources from Ukraine. The Russian element on Liaoning is none to low (aircraft not included)
Liaoning was completely overhauled, floating and power-enabled when we had the inauguration
while your gigantic ironing board is like a 3/8 baked cake presented for celebration
SCS is the sea territory where Liaoning will operate then.
Liaoning provides valuable experience for us to the building and operating of our next aircraft carrier(s) for sure
see the above answer. You have to be patient for the rolling out of the next CV or CVN
We have a lot of experience in shipbuilding that easily trumps india
your gigantic ironing board is designed by the Italians
on forums and on paper only
I believe that ACC may be deployed by IN in case of war against Pakistan, and so this discussion. If it is not deployed then there is no point in this argument.
And don't worry, we will find Jets that will carry our ACCK against IN, when necessary.
As for your Air Force, we are not very concerned, as the Russian BVRs that you carry have 0 kills in their history and are extremely unreliable where as the BVRs that we carry have an excellent record. The story is quite similar, although not as grim, with regards to WVR Missiles. Plus, most importantly, we will have force multipliers in ground based SAM assets and Jammers plus AWACS well within PAF airspace while IAF will have to face all those along with PAF .
You expect to be engaging threats beyond 300km's of your CBG? CAP missions beyond 200km's? Really?
Can you prove any of the above? Please provide evidence, especially the grounding of F-16's in fear of the mighty MKI....opps not even MKIs but Mig-29!!
You're trying too hard. That's your problem. You're putting in far too much effort.