Hamza913
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2015
- Messages
- 8,954
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
This thread will be exactly what the title is about. I stress this simply because aircraft carriers allow strikes from the sea thus eliminating the need for airbases. How this can be accomplished is complex since most likely the ship will be with a carrier strike group but there are three options I see #1 being anti-ship cruise missiles launched in barrages from shore based batteries #2 being air-launched Exocets and #3 being ship-launched or even submarines destroying the ship. The ship will be well defended so the best option would be a preemptive sinking when war is imminent. If someone with more experience about Pakistan's and India's navy that could elaborate on options.
View attachment 543585
JF-17 with Exocet.
Sending in Thunders armed with CM-400AKGs along with block 52 Vipers as escorts seems like a good game plan, along with using submarines and land-based ballistic missiles.
Can MANPADS not shoot down helicopters?
Ignore him he's not sane.
If the subs were lost the lost would be justified
No, it wouldn't be. Pakistan should only go after the carrier if it feels confident it can take it out.
Counter intuitive when India has more soldiers and the better ability to push through Pakistan.
Nasr can easily dispose of any and all advancing columns if the Pakistani army ever gets overwhelmed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasr_(missile)