What's new

How CCP ruling china solong

Your misunderstand of what I wrote isn't my problem, try to figure what i wrote before take the issue with me. You stated US citizens can't tell the different between New Mexico is part of US and Mexico apart. I prove your statement is false. No need to Google to validate my point.
 
.
there are a lot of bad press about China on the internet which can be reached anywhere on this planet,but we don't just eat whatever crap that your media try to feed us like you do,ha

ccp china - YouTube

A US citizen know more about China political structure compare to the Chinese citizen in China.

Ok,can you explain this sentence more clearly to me, I don't know how else I can read this sentence.
 
.
there are a lot of bad press about China on the internet which can be reached anywhere on this planet,but we don't just eat whatever crap that your media try to feed us like you do,ha

ccp china - YouTube



Ok,can you explain this sentence more clearly to me, I don't know how else I can read this sentence.


You can't take part of the sentence away from the context of my comment. Read my post, again. Since you can't understand what I mean, I will explain to you. I mean anyone not a Chinese live in China can't tell the make up political structure in China. As for what the US media presented China in a negative light and you won't agree with what they said, it's your right to reject whatever their opinion they have on China.
 
.
sincity said:
A US citizen know more about China political structure compare to the Chinese citizen in China. Rubbish opinion can't take seriously.

How could I take your sentence out of the context,since you just posted this one sentence,and it doesn't seem to be very difficult to understand,you may ask around and see how other people here understand the sentence.lol.
 
.
No, you convince people to vote for you.
Then the American populace is just as imcompetent as he is which it isn't true at all. You wish it is that simple. The reality is that by having influencial people around you, you get access to big war chest which translate into bigger media coverage and better campaign strategists, and by having political capitals you get access to those people who would bring the credibility to you even if you are as smart as a chair, the voters won't know the difference until its too late(in GWB's case it was never late). I admire your belief that today US government's policy is depended on general public's opinion rather than influenced by the lobbists represent various special interests groups and corporates.

And yet in the short history it has, the US have accomplished so much despite electing incompetents like B43, who is probably is far more competent as governor and President than the previous generation of China's leaders that produced the economic and social disaster that was Cold War China.

But basically, you support political elitism in China. The new royalty. They exclude commoners like you simply because you have no political experience. You do not even deserve to make any opinions of them, and if you do make any opinions of them, you are ignored anyway since you do not matter, not even in the least.
Mind you that the history of PRC is even much short than USA. Although in the early days it had made some mistakes, in the past 30 something years the government has done a remarkable job for its people. Just 20 years ago owning a car is only a dream for most Chinese even if they live in the coast area of China, and now cities like Shanghai and Beijing has to restrict number of new cars being registered to ease the traffic even though new roads are being built at lightning speed. However those restriction hasn't stopped people's enthusiasm of owning a car, for example in Shanghai since each month the license plate for new vehicle is limited, and each of them has to be put for auction. Now the price just for a license plate is already close to RMB 100,000(that is enough for buy a cheap new car in US). If you think any politician in US is capable of doing a better job in China, then be my guest. Although I hate to make this kind of comparison, but while you criticising of PRC government of not being capable of producing results, why don't you bring some examples from a country that has similiar population and started as poor as China.

As for your accusing me of supporting "political elitism", and I gladly admit me being guilty of that. However this political elitist group is not exclusive as you made it out to be. Vast majority of the politicians that hold top positions in China come from humble background, as I said before in my previous post they got there by climbing the power ladder step by step like everyone else. Everyone who wish to make his opinion matters can take a public servant entrance exam which is open to everyone let he/she be the son of the president or from poor farmer's family, and its is required for anyone who wish to work in the politics, then you can work your way up there by showing good result. If someone wants his or her opinion to matter to others, it should be earned rather than given as a birth right. You can't argue that people graduated from elite school's opinion doesn't matter more than someone has an associate degree from community college. Those schools aren't exclusive, people get accepted to those school by being competent.

Why should I not agreed with those reporters? Even if we all turn out wrong in the future, that in itself is nothing extraordinary. But given the fact that you support political elitism in China, what make you think little miss Mingze will not someday sneer down her nose at you from the palaces of Beijing?
Why shouldn't you agree? The same reason you don't agree with other reporters when they have shown that they have no real experience in the field they were talking about.

So my question for you is that the bet is on or not?
 
Last edited:
.
How could I take your sentence out of the context,since you just posted this one sentence,and it doesn't seem to be very difficult to understand,you may ask around and see how other people here understand the sentence.lol.



You only focus on the 1st part of my statement, and not the 2nd part. Therefore, you misunderstand my post. It's rubbish to believe a US citizen had more knowledge of China political structure compare to the Chinese citizen live in China. It's your problem that can't understand what i mean only in 1 part of my post.
 
.
oh,I see,you know someone else said that,I thought you said that,and the second part refers to some previous comments which I didnt bother to read through.
 
.
oh,I see,you know someone else said that,I thought you said that,and the second part refers to some previous comments which I didnt bother to read through.



It can be me who I refer to a US citizen or refer to other people. Don't make any certain claim on any subject, you will sometime be wrong.
 
.
......................................

In Western democracies, elected representatives are accountable to no one.

I agree that the so-called elected "representative" are actually not a real representative.

I elected my local politician, but I don't feel to be represented. I do believe that most people in India and Pakistan will say the same thing.
 
.
I agree that the so-called elected "representative" are actually not a real representative.

I elected my local politician, but I don't feel to be represented. I do believe that most people in India and Pakistan will say the same thing.
Those so call representatives only represent those campaign contributors that actually put them in power by giving money to them for getting your votes by any necessary means.
 
.
your self proclaimed statement enough proof for china is more democratic:rofl::rofl:

You can speak democratic as an idea or a real world practice.

In term of idea, China is probably less democratic. But in term of real world practical, China is the world most democratic country, far ahead any democracy countries.

I'm not making a joke or sarcasm.

You can read multiple the international survey reports about it in Google. You can also read that Mainland Chinese don't want the "outdated" democracy article too.
 
.
I agree that the so-called elected "representative" are actually not a real representative.

I elected my local politician, but I don't feel to be represented. I do believe that most people in India and Pakistan will say the same thing.

Your so-called elected "representative" dissipates the moment your ballet drops into the box. He then becomes your master.
 
.
Democracy is first and foremost an economic concept。

Funny that the West,especially America,has dished economic democracy and use the ballots for the so-called political democracy which we all know is simply a case of some big liars,who are supported and financed by interests groups,telling a bunch of agitated fools to pretend that they control their own destiny.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom