What's new

How 20 million Pakistanis defeated 500 million indians in 2 wars (1948, 1965) captured from them a territory larger then Austria or Czech Republic


I can do the same and dig out tons of non-Pakistani reports about India, In the end, it still does not change the ground realities.

And the same is true for Bangladesh. We have some confused people advocating us to become like the world's most densely populated country.

The World Bank which they keep citing already lists Bangladesh has having amongst half the world's poorest of the poor.

World's most densely populated country. Their capital is also reported be the second most polluted in the world. Not surprising.

Even bangladeshi sources have argued the economic growth their has widened the gap between rich and poor.

Not to mention their economy mostly consists of garments.

Pakistan might be shambles, no doubt. But do I want it to become another India or Bangladesh? No thanks!

India is very unique with respect to ground realities and what's reported by their media and their govt. My in-laws are from India and provide 1st hand details.
 
.
For some this may feel like a david vs goliath win but it is not really that if you look little bit deeper. Pakistan has always been superior to India and this is not only about modern era but going back 3000 years..

their defeats were in 1948 and 1965 conventionally in 1948 they lost a territory larger then Austria and Czech Republic to Pakistan which is called today Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir held by Pakistan to this day. In to 1965 Pakistan beat back their offensive to retake these territories but advanced into mainland India in counter-attack..

Iron Age vedic era Pakistanis had nothing to do with India. Modern day Pakistanis are simply superior to their indian counter-parts and ruling elite of the subcontinent.

There is alot of talk about Aryan expansion in Indian history and that expansion was by today's so-called aryans who were the current day Pakistan..

Agreed with everything, except the Vedic civilization was not an Iron Age civilization. It was a Bronze Age civilization that extended into the late Bronze Age.

The Indo-Scythian kingdom (Indo as in Indus) is an example of an Iron Age civilization.
 
.
India is very unique with respect to ground realities and what's reported by their media and their govt. My in-laws are from India and provide 1st hand details.

I heard just as much. One of my relatives in UAE married a woman from Mumbai/Bombay and she was astonished how much cleaner Karachi was compared to Mumbai when she visited.

The same is true for Bangladesh. The ground realities are so different from the delusional propaganda by their government sponsored media. It is in contrast to reality.

Aisde from the ego-centic ones, we have some seriously honest Bangladeshi posters on this forum who ask questions like "why can't the Bangladeshi people eat statistics for Breakfast, lunch & dinner?"

I am with them.
 
Last edited:
.
India does not have an economy, its a 3rd world country with cooked numbers. Never trust India's GDP figures, it never has tangible progress on the ground to back those numbers.

Again, likewise for Bangladesh. Especially GDP per capita when most of these are raw figures of dividing national GDP by the population.

Now that Pakistan has surpassed Bangladesh in population size GDP per capita will appear larger.

It still doesn't explain why the World Bank lists them as having one of the world's largest poor populations, even larger than Pakistan's poor or how many millions of unregistered Bengalis live illegally in Pakistan.
 
.
I am responding to what was thrown at me. Go and look up the etymology of the name "India" you madrassa graduate.

Even before independence, Jinnah opposed the new country from adopting this name. Pakistan is and always was the geographical India, long before this new country stole the name.

Now bugger off, you confused mentally ill madrassa grad.

Listen Gullu Butt, in different languages India has different names. In Urdu it's Bharat or Hindostan, in in Sanskrit it's Bharat, English it's India, in Persian it's Hind and in Chinese it's Indu. Because they follow the culture which is a branch of Dharmic tradition, that's why Hind.

Pakistan remains Pakistan in all languages and is not a Dharmic country, that was the main cause of partition.

People like you are the real cause of current situation in Pakistan who lacks education and have been brainwashed by the ra*dibaaz jarnails.

And this is exactly what the problems is.
 
.
Listen Gullu Butt, in different languages India has different names. In Urdu it's Bharat or Hindostan, in in Sanskrit it's Bharat, English it's India, in Persian it's Hind and in Chinese it's Indu. Because they follow the culture which is a branch of Dharmic tradition, that's why Hind.

Pakistan remains Pakistan in all languages and is not a Dharmic country, that was the main cause of partition.

People like you are the real cause of current situation in Pakistan who lacks education and have been brainwashed by the ra*dibaaz jarnails.

And this is exactly what the problems is.

Hindustan means land of the Indus which is in Pakistan. Same for Hind and Indu. Land of the Indus river.

No such thing as a "Dharmic country." No such thing as "partition."

The rest is you describing yourself. Now get lost you self-loathing muhajir troll.
 
Last edited:
.
Agreed with everything, except the Vedic civilization was not an Iron Age civilization. It was a Bronze Age civilization that extended into the late Bronze Age.

The Indo-Scythian kingdom (Indo as in Indus) is an example of an Iron Age civilization.

You are correct regarding the Bronze age civilization
 
.
Hindustan means land of the Indus which is in Pakistan. Same for Hind and Indu. Land of the Indus river.

No such thing as a "Dharmic country." No such thing as "partition."

The rest is you describing yourself. Now get lost you self-loathing muhajir troll.

He is not self-loathing he is Indian masked as Pakistani. There are quit alot of them
 
. .
Is this from some ISPR drama or real pic? How old is this pic? Anyone know?

The guy on the extreme right looks EERILY similar to a guy I did my ISSB with. Clean shaved to the bone. Same slightly khusra look (apologies, no other way to describe it.) Everyone knew he would qualify. Athletic, punctual, was a hunter by hobby. Perfect choice for ISSB. Name started with E, in case anyone here knows
 
. .
Pakistan is under a war imposed by India since August 2019. The situation can only be best described as being under siege.

India is too invested in her cold start doctrine and 2 frontal war to back down.

The recent indus water treaty threats and subsequent sabotage of IMF program are part of the Indian designs for war.
 
. .
Is this from some ISPR drama or real pic? How old is this pic? Anyone know?

The guy on the extreme right looks EERILY similar to a guy I did my ISSB with. Clean shaved to the bone. Same slightly khusra look (apologies, no other way to describe it.) Everyone knew he would qualify. Athletic, punctual, was a hunter by hobby. Perfect choice for ISSB. Name started with E, in case anyone here knows
No this is real pic not ispr
 
.
For some this may feel like a david vs goliath win but it is not really that if you look little bit deeper. Pakistan has always been superior to India and this is not only about modern era but going back 3000 years..

their defeats were in 1948 and 1965 conventionally in 1948 they lost a territory larger then Austria and Czech Republic to Pakistan which is called today Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir held by Pakistan to this day. In to 1965 Pakistan beat back their offensive to retake these territories but advanced into mainland India in counter-attack..

Iron Age vedic era Pakistanis had nothing to do with India. Modern day Pakistanis are simply superior to their indian counter-parts and ruling elite of the subcontinent.

There is alot of talk about Aryan expansion in Indian history and that expansion was by today's so-called aryans who were the current day Pakistan..

View attachment 903864


The Proto-Aryans are often mistakenly confused with Indics but the only thing they did is some of them expanded southwards towards Indian subcontinent and the journey down south was due to economical reasons. They have done close to 10-15 incursions into the Indian main land in the last 3000 years including the Islamic expansions as majority of the Punjabis and current day Pakistan were muslims for atleast 1100+ years they tagged along. but as for their previous expansions pre-Islam it is known as the Aryan expansions today.

[View attachment 903865
View attachment 903866
View attachment 903867



The girl in the second picture from the end of the post looks EXACTLY like Saddam Hussein's youngest neice.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom