yeah grammars a long shot i ain't a linguist buddy.
Pakistan's central issue with India is Kashmir, not India's muslims - India can disengage Pakistan by solving Kashmir's issue. And your second deduction is faulty too, the three communities (PM, IM, BM) will grow apart more and more with the passage of time simply because of isolation.
That was impossible, the educated elite was predominantly Muhajirs and Punjabis, even in the 1960s 34.5% of civil servants were Muahjirs. Nations build upon modern educated and hard working populace, not some pseudo- historical racist bullshit, otherwise your greater Khorasan "non- Indic" countries like Tajkistan , Afghanistan, Uzbekistan would not have been corrupt and riddled with chaos.
That's one the dumbest argument I have listened in ages, lingua franca are not "chosen", they are spoken by the elites and adopted by the masses.
That's pseudo-historical bullshit, Buddhism and Hinduism too were dominant in present day Pakistan. IVC was spread from Indian Gujarat to NWFP. Hindu Shahis were ruling Afghnistan etc.
It's all about Kashmir, I don't know why you're willfully ignoring that
Nope, while the Yavanas (Greeks), Shakas (Scythians) were initially termed as mlechchas, they became Hinduised pretty quickly, ancient brahmins just wanted Vedas to be followed - when someone started doing Ashwamedha and rewarding brahmins, that would please brahmins, ancient Hinduism is not called Brahminism for no reason. Also it would be foolish to assume Sakas were limited to Pakistan, Western Satraps had their capital in Ujjain, yup in Central India. It is also reported that there was marital alliances between Indo-greeks and Mauryas, yup today's Bihar.
That's pseudo-scientific racism with no basis in academia
No, all Indic languages derives from varieties of Apabhraṃśa, which was not necessarily limited to Gangetic plain. Maybe, there are few here who acquainted with even basic linguistics
That's discredited too and is now classified as pseudo - science. Human history is very complex.
Ok, go ask Saudis, Iranians and Turkish. You're wannabe Arabs, Iranis, Turks but they will not most likely accept you as their own. Heck, even Turks disparages Arabs by calling them Arap, Iranians disparages Arabs as malakh-khor. Now what do they think about Pakistanis? And ask Saudis who treat you (and Indians) like shit, we are just one of the Dawla-Al-Miskeen for them.
Making a statement does not count as a "fact".
Make it a habit to back up your claims with sources and facts, preferably from academia
So was of every Sultante from Delhi to Bengal to Madurai, so?
Doing blah, blah does not make it a fact, muslim elites remained there, were a part of the Muhajirs, and are still living there.
LOL
That's your opinion without substantiated by a single fact.
Burst your bubbles, and I would like you to elaborate more on this point
No, I am a RSS stooge hell bent to massacre my own people and then cry like a little bi**h on a Pakistani forum. Happy?
Yes, but now media is maligning this pogrom as a planned attack by Jihadis on Hindus. Some are even calling it a terrorist attack, LOL.
I know that but try calling a Turk Arap in Turkey and see the reaction.
No bro, I have watched a lot of documentaries on Arab-Turkish relation, read Turkish history and how even many Turks (not all) are wannabe Europeans
