HAL Hands Over Tejas Jets To IAF

[Storm Force]

Well well look who is here. The great statiscian

Dazzler

Hiding behind Sarcasm

Know the trait well ...... Especially useful when you have now answer or befitting reply .

 

[Storm Force]

The Tejas fighter's role in war | Business Standard News

Great article explaining what Tejas brings to the indian air force.

We need to induct over 200 Tejas in three blocks between now- 2025.

Completely doable with the resources available to india.

Like the article says

Tejas will have the most advanced airframe with lowest RCS of any fighter ijn IAF or indeed PAF.

Wil be superior to anything in PAF bar the F16/52

And can perform variety of missions and completely replace MIG21/27/JAGS in the IAF.

 

[Superboy]

IMO Tejas has a long way to go to catch up. First JF-17 SP delivered in 2007. Tejas 8 years late. Still, better than India's nuclear subs. China's first nuclear sub commissioned in 1974. India's first nuclear sub is still yet to commission

Tejas will have the most advanced airframe with lowest RCS of any fighter ijn IAF or indeed PAF.

Wil be superior to anything in PAF bar the F16/52

I beg to differ.

JF-17 has DSI the first jet to do so. Therefore, JF-17 has more advanced airframe than Tejas.

JF-17 and Tejas should have similar frontal RCS. DSI reduces frontal RCS while Tejas is smaller.

 

[Storm Force]

Jf17 alloy airframe old fashioned no composite material.

Also jf17 only single axis digital fbw flight control. Tejss full qudruplex digital fbw and unstable designed airframe.

We keep telling you thus superboy.

Why do you keep spouting same old rubbish.

Thunder has outdated technology and far behind tejas

Arihant nuclear submarine frommibdua has been on sea trials for one year now.

Besides we can't match china anywa

 

[Superboy]

Jf17 alloy airframe old fashioned no composite material.

Also jf17 only single axis digital fbw flight control. Tejss full qudruplex digital fbw and unstable designed airframe.

We keep telling you thus superboy.

Why do you keep spouting same old rubbish.

Thunder has outdated technology and far behind tejas

Arihant nuclear submarine frommibdua has been on sea trials for one year now.

Besides we can't match china anywa

JF-17 does have composites. Both planes have composites. It is not a qualitative difference but a quantitative one. Besides, composites do nothing anyway. Every plane building country has that technology.

JF-17 has DSI Tejas does not. This is a qualitative difference. Only China and the US have DSI technololgy.

JF-17 has quadruplex FBW. Avionics | JF-17 Thunder

JF-17 has unstable airframe design. Actually, the correct term is relaxed stability. That's why JF-17 needs FBW to fly.

 

[Superboy]

If jf 17 is such super plane , one big question why isnt PLAAF inducting these ?

Because PLAAF does not use light fighters like JF-17, Tejas, Gripen, F-CK-1. PLAAF's last light fighters are J-7 which are replaced by J-10 which is not a light fighter but a Rafale sized medium fighter.

 

[Dazzler]

Dazzler

Hiding behind Sarcasm

Know the trait well ...... Especially useful when you have now answer or befitting reply .

You have been embarrassed so many times that your posts don't worth my time.

 

[Superboy]

oh i see so j 10 b is comparable to rafale ?

dose it have supercruise
what is payload cap
how many hard points
comparison between j10 b ew suite and spectra please ?

J-10B has super cruise due to high thrust to weight ratio. J-10B has 11 hardpoints. J-10B has the same tail EW as Rafale's Spectra. Look.

 

[Storm Force]

Dazzler nobody has embaressed.

I regular slaughter pdf members with hard hitting facts.

Do you want an example

How about comparing the annual budget of paf v iaf
Or the expected training budget of paf v iaf
Or the no of true fourth generation fighters in each air force.

Best

 

[Superboy]

Dazzler nobody has embaressed.

I regular slaughter pdf members with hard hitting facts.

Do you want an example

How about comparing the annual budget of paf v iaf
Or the expected training budget of paf v iaf
Or the no of true fourth generation fighters in each air force.

Best

Pakistan is a smaller country than India, but Pakistan has proportionally a lot more fighter jets than India does compared to the size of Pakistan to India.

 

[chhota bheem]

Pakistan is a smaller country than India, but Pakistan has proportionally a lot more fighter jets than India does compared to the size of Pakistan to India.

But the problem is comparitively and proportionally dsnt help in an actual combat.

 

[Superboy]

But the problem is comparitively and proportionally dsnt help in an actual combat.

Sure it does. Arabs can't beat Israel. Israel can't beat Gaza. Russia can't beat Ukraine. How can India beat Pakistan which is a very big country?

 

[chhota bheem]

Sure it does. Arabs can't beat Israel. Israel can't beat Gaza. Russia can't beat Ukraine. How can India beat Pakistan which is a very big country?

Of all the countries you mentioned who has DSI and who dsnt.

 

[Superboy]

Of all the countries you mentioned who has DSI and who dsnt.

Only Pakistan has DSI.

 

[Sankpal]

Only Pakistan has DSI.

Hehehehehehe

every time you bring DSI technology...................... Seriously everytime you kidding on every threats and says DSI DSI DSI

DSI is nothing my friend...... it is just a...
One advantage of DSI is that these inlets also crucially improve the aircraft's very-low-observable characteristics (by eliminating radar reflections between the diverter and the aircraft's skin).[2] Additionally, the "bump" surface reduces the engine's exposure to radar, significantly reducing a strong source of radar reflection[3] because they provide an additional shielding of engine fans against radar waves.

Analysts have noted that the DSI reduces the need for application of radar absorbent materials.[4][5]