Since you are incapable of proving me wrong, yet you cannot wait to label me wrong just like typical Indian medias.
Nonetheless, i am share to surmise my version here:
Discussion on this thread is on the matter of credibility of Indian medias after Indian medias quoted Gohar Rizvi saying Pakistan is allegedly behind the attacks. On neutral resource, Gohar Rizvi has denied any Pakistani connection to behind the attack. Hence, we are shaming Indian medias to no end.
To my conclusion here.
Indian medias is shameless, hence the comparison with PTI because PTI holds u-turn reputation too. What part of the context don't you understand or any context that suggests i am wrong?
You have just embarrassed yourself. I am gonna screenshot this before you edit your post.
Indian media has shady reputation. If Gohar Rizvi is denying that he allegedly accused of Pakistan in connection to attack in Bangladesh, that does not look good on Indian medias since only Indian medias ran anti-Pakistani propaganda news 24 hours being the enemy of Pakistan, while not a single neutral source has reported to indicate Pakistan is behind the attack. Even neural source appears to be in agreement that ISIS is behind the attack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indian medias is shameless and rightly so. Cannot wait to blame Pakistan at first opportunity to make mockery of its own later. Embarrassment nation to the world. Hence the comparison with PTI because both will get along well knowing their questionable reputations and their soft corner for TTP.