FoxNews: 'Iran Deserves To Be Annihilated'

[BLACKEAGLE]

Who are you to decide what Iranian people want?Stop already with your BS again.If you suffer from Iranian policy in region,live with it or you can shot yourself.And you talking about democracy,freedom while living in Jordan, well that's worth a smile.

Look, you don't have an idea how much you distorted Iran image here. Every time you resort to lying with baseless comments in order to get members attention away from the real issue. What you mentioned about Jordan isn't true at all. However, Do you know that there isn't a single political prisoner in Jordan since 1991? Do you know that 2400 demonstrations were staged in Jordan in 2011 and not a single person was killed or imprisoned? Do you know that we can harshly criticize the government and the king? Do you know that any Jordanian citizen can sue any official? Do you know that Iran needs at least 20 years to be like Jordan in terms of democracy and freedom?
I will not live with Iranian malicious policy in the region but rather the Iranian regime is going to change it in the hard way as I said. Iran fingers were chopped off in Northern Yemen as well as in Bahrain. In Syria, Iranian hands will be chopped off then the head itself will be smashed which is represented by the regime. I hope you will be here in the coming few years or months to remind you of this.

 

[Paan Singh]

lol. You have so many wrong arguments.

First of all, the US firms pulled out of Iran's energy sector from almost 2 decades ago (few years after the Iraq-Iran war and only during Khatami era we had very limited trade with some American firms in energy sector). the USA has imposed unilateral sanctions against Iran since 3 decades ago, those are the toughest ones that the USA could impose on any other nation.
Their recent move has just made them a laughing stock of the world. They claimed that the Iranian would get crippled in weeks and Iran would be forced to negotiate with them over its nuclear program if they imposed sanctions on Iranian oil, everyone's seeing how their sanctions are working. We had a much worse situation backing 1980's than now and we survived.

About the Iranian military power, Pakistan is not to be underestimated, but we're well capable of defending our country. Our military power is indeed capable of deterring any country from adventurism.

About the Taliban, you must be kidding. Do you think this time it's like 1980's that they could bring the Taliban to power again? This time as the first second the USA goes out of Afghanistan, Afghanistan's politics will be heavily influenced by China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. the USA will never bring the Taliban back to power for trillions of reasons, and if they're talking to the Taliban today it's all because they've reached a dead end in there. Had they wanted the Taliban in power, they wouldn't have removed them from power with their own hands, we all know that the Taliban was no threat to the USA at all and couldn't be a threat to them either in centuries.

First of all, the US firms pulled out of Iran's energy sector from almost 2 decades ago (few years after the Iraq-Iran war and only during Khatami era we had very limited trade with some American firms in energy sector). the USA has imposed unilateral sanctions against Iran since 3 decades ago, those are the toughest ones that the USA could impose on any other nation.
Their recent move has just made them a laughing stock of the world. They claimed that the Iranian would get crippled in weeks and Iran would be forced to negotiate with them over its nuclear program if they imposed sanctions on Iranian oil, everyone's seeing how their sanctions are working. We had a much worse situation backing 1980's than now and we survived.

yes these sanctions will never work due to oil.

About the Iranian military power, Pakistan is not to be underestimated, but we're well capable of defending our country. Our military power is indeed capable of deterring any country from adventurism.

sorry to say no...your air power or navy is very weak.

About the Taliban, you must be kidding. Do you think this time it's like 1980's that they could bring the Taliban to power again? This time as the first second the USA goes out of Afghanistan, Afghanistan's politics will be heavily influenced by China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. the USA will never bring the Taliban back to power for trillions of reasons, and if they're talking to the Taliban today it's all because they've reached a dead end in there. Had they wanted the Taliban in power, they wouldn't have removed them from power with their own hands, we all know that the Taliban was no threat to the USA at all and couldn't be a threat to them either in centuries.

firstly U.S will never go through afganistan.
secondly,They will leave 20k-25k troops there but main combat role will be handled by afgan troops under U.S supervision.
you may see it in coming future how afgan soil will be used against iran.
Thirdly,U.S never came here for al qaeda or some thing like this..they came here to have control over caspian resources.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

@ Arian,

no actually, until only recently Iran had NOT faced USA's toughest sanctions. Review the level of sanctions Pakistan was facing in the 1990s during work on our nuclear weapons program.


we were sanctioned to the teeth; i believe it was Colon Powell who once wrote about it

 

[Arian]

yes these sanctions will never work due to oil.

Doesn't that contradict your own argument?

sorry to say no...your air power or navy is very weak.

I agree that Iran's air force is weak, that's a fact, but we're working on it. Our missiles can compensate our weak air force. about our naval forces, they are one of the best in the region and even the USA has confirmed so many times that they are able to close the strait of hormuz for a month which means disaster for the world economy. That means we're indeed capable of projecting power on international economy which is very important.

firstly U.S will never go through afganistan.
secondly,They will leave 20k-25k troops there but main combat role will be handled by afgan troops under U.S supervision.
you may see it in coming future how afgan soil will be used against iran.
Thirdly,U.S never came here for al qaeda or some thing like this..they came here to have control over caspian resources.

Let's see how many US soldiers will get killed in the years to come. I can ensure you that sooner or later we'll see uprisings in Afghanistan against the Americans.
They won't leave any troops in there if they feel that their safety is endangered. and unlike the previous time, this time they can not come back to Afghanistan under the guise of democracy. Afghanistan is a neighbor of China, which means China will have a lot to say about the US presence in her neighborhood.
Thirdly, Afghanistan is a land locked country, it has no path to the Caspian sea, Turkmenistan and Iran separate Afghanistan from the Caspian sea. Explain what you mean by controlling the Caspian sea. (They could invest in Azerbaijan instead and they're already doing that, but it's very hard to replace Russia in the Caucasus)

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

@ Arian,

no actually, until only recently Iran had NOT faced USA's toughest sanctions. Review the level of sanctions Pakistan was facing in the 1990s during work on our nuclear weapons program.


we were sanctioned to the teeth; i believe it was Colon Powell who once wrote about it

True, but without KSA unlimited financial aids Pakistan wouldn't survive. I don't think Arab nor Muslims countries adopted the sanctions on Pakistan.

 

[wmdisinfo]

As the “drumbeat to war” with Iran, as Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) warns of, grows louder, a number of journalists have begun to compare the hawkish rhetoric from pundits with the calls for military action against Iraq in 2002. Scott Shane, writing on the frontpage of today’s New York Times, observed, “Echoes of the period leading up to the Iraq war in 2003 are unmistakable, igniting a familiar debate over whether journalists are overstating Iran’s progress toward a bomb.” Indeed, the ombudsman of The Washington Post and the public editor of The New York Times criticized their own journalists for overstating the evidence of Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program.




Over the past week, journalists have raised the alarm about the increasing carelessness of the mainstream media in hyping the calls for war with Iran. But Fox News commentator and The Daily Caller editor-in-chief Tucker Carlson openly called for war against Iran and argued for the full-scale annihilation of the Islamic Republic during an appearance on Fox News’s late-night show Red Eye. Carlson responded to a question about U.S. military action:
CARLSON: I think we are the only country with the moral authority [...] sufficient to do that. [The U.S. is] the only country that doesn’t seek hegemony in the world. I do think, I’m sure I’m the lone voice in saying this, that Iran deserves to be annihilated. I think they’re lunatics. I think they’re evil.
Carlson, having called for the annihilation of Iran — a country with a population of over 74 million people — went on to acknowledge that “we should assess what will happen to the price of energy were we to do that.”

Carlson doesn’t bother to make a case for why the U.S. should destroy Iran. But presumably he’s referring to the crisis over Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program. However, neither the IAEA nor U.S. intelligence reports conclude that Iran has restarted its nuclear weapons program. The IAEA and U.S. intelligence have expressed concerns about possible military aspects to Iran’s nuclear program and suspicions about Iran’s program intensified after Tehran refused IAEA inspectors access to facilities thought to be used for tests on how to produce nuclear weapons. Tehran also refused to agree to a process by which it would address IAEA concerns about “possible military dimensions” to its nuclear program.
But, much as in the case of the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, many journalists and politicians are ignoring the facts on the ground and pushing forward with calls for increasingly aggressive actions. Carlson, however, may stand alone in publicly calling for Iran’s outright annihilation.

Tucker Carlson: 'Iran Deserves To Be Annihilated' | ThinkProgress

what sort of moral authority are they talking about?i think USA shold annilated as they are lunitics.

 

[Arian]

@ Arian,

no actually, until only recently Iran had NOT faced USA's toughest sanctions. Review the level of sanctions Pakistan was facing in the 1990s during work on our nuclear weapons program.


we were sanctioned to the teeth; i believe it was Colon Powell who once wrote about it

since 2000 they've been forcing other nations to restrict their trade with us, they've been trying hard to isolate Iran, they're even giving concessions to global powers to isolate Iran, what else they could've done?
No sane person would have sanctioned Iran's oil, they did, now what else? military option? They can only bomb our nuclear facilities, they can't even set foot on our soil, after that we'll quit from the NPT and talk to them in the harsh way.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

True, but without KSA unlimited financial aids you Pakistan wouldn't survive. I don't think Arab nor Muslims countries adopted the sanctions on Pakistan.

it wasn't "unlimited financial aids" --that is a myth that can be neglected. Friendly countries did throw their support behind us and this never went un-appreciated by Pakistan.

most of the support (from countries like KSA) was in the form of deferred oil payments, or other such concessions. Cash came as well obviously, but they werent bank-rolling Pakistan. Pakistan has been through much worse crises -- so "surviving" was never an issue for us.


and in retrospect, Pakistan did the absolute right thing by staying on target and completing the mission --especially since the eastern-neighbour country was doing so (and in a very menacing manner at that)



the effect of sanctions was that it simply raised anti-american sentiment in the country -- which seems to be a very cyclical phenomenon.....it also forced us to adopt indigenous solutions in the field of defence -- which I and many others believe was the greatest thing that could ever happen.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

since 2000 they've been forcing other nations to restrict their trade with us, they've been trying hard to isolate Iran, they're even giving concessions to global powers to isolate Iran, what else they could've done?
No sane person would have sanctioned Iran's oil, they did, now what else? military option? They can only bomb our nuclear facilities, they can't even set foot on our soil, after that we'll quit from the NPT and talk to them in the harsh way.

well some analysts @ Pentagon are of the opinion that even an air-dropped 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb would possibly not put an end to Iranian nuke program.

what else is left? well, we are seeing the rhetoric and psy-ops being waged on Iran.....they'll probably be more Jundollah attacks (which we get blamed for blindly, like everything else); new militant groups emerging or re-emerging (e.g. MeK) and more targets on nuclear scientists.

they are also itching for Iran to make a "mistake" or provocation.


nerves are extremely thin at this point, anything could trigger a war.......hopefully sanity prevails. War on Iran would be quick -- but Iran's retaliation would probably be over time....and it will be extremely destabilizing and extremely dangerous for our region.




my best advice to Iranian regime --- if you're gonna have a nuclear program, shut up about it and stop making provocative public statements.


Until only recently, Iranians had the ultra-luxury of being able to mouth off and make such statements in public -- and then enjoy increased revenues from oil because speculators in the industry went into panic mode and prices went up.


they were gettin paid to talk shyte.....wish we had that luxury

 

[Arian]

well some analysts @ Pentagon are of the opinion that even an air-dropped 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb would possibly not put an end to Iranian nuke program.

Yea, but we assume that they have bombed all of our nuclear facilities (that are over 20 in number), what then? seriously what then? What else they could do?

what else is left? well, we are seeing the rhetoric and psy-ops being waged on Iran.....they'll probably be more Jundollah attacks (which we get blamed for blindly, like everything else); new militant groups emerging or re-emerging (e.g. MeK) and more targets on nuclear scientists.

Jundullah's operations have reduced significantly after we arrested and executed their leader (Abdul Malik Rigi), but you're right, they'll support terrorists against Iran again and I believe their next move is to create a support base for the MEK terrorists in Azerbaijan.

they are also itching for Iran to make a "mistake" or provocation.

nerves are extremely thin at this point, anything could trigger a war.......hopefully sanity prevails. War on Iran would be quick -- but Iran's retaliation would probably be over time....and it will be extremely destabilizing and extremely dangerous for our region.

Iran is not that stupid to provoke the largest military power of the world for a war. We have learned how to deal with the Americans after 3 decades, we punch them sometimes, but not in a way that they want to come after us.
There is no doubt that the USA can cause serious damage to our infrastructure, but our retaliation will destroy the plans they have for the region and change their equations for ever.

my best advice to Iranian regime --- if you're gonna have a nuclear program, shut up about it and stop making provocative public statements.

Actually the only provocative statement, if you can call it so, that Iran has ever made was Ahmadinejad saying Israel should be wiped off the map. He never really said that though, it was only a mistranslation, but Iran has always reiterated that it's not seeking nuclear weapons, so I don't know which provocative public statements you're talking about.

Until only recently, Iranians had the ultra-luxury of being able to mouth off and make such statements in public -- and then enjoy increased revenues from oil because speculators in the industry went into panic mode and prices went up.

As long as energy prices are high, Iran is safe. We'll keep China tied in business with us and Russia enjoys from high energy prices. So everything's fine. the USA could do nothing about it but demonizing Iran and spreading propaganda against Iran. (which will surely fail at some point)

 

[r3alist]

Indeed Ahmadinejad was not even himself giving this sentence but he just quoted Khomeini words and it was mistranslated and out of context. totally agree.

I thank Solomon because it is nice to read that they guy is sorry for the stupid fanatic words he was saying.

I wish that people full of hatred in both sides have les and less power. The stance anti US exists in Iran and most people are tired of this. It is useless to hatre a country we should build a relation of respect.

dont be grateful for crumbs, in other words he should be apologizing for the egregious slander he has been spreading on iranians, pakistani's and other peoples, thats when i will find something nice to read.

the worst thing is jews know all about slander on a group of people, shameful.

 

[Paan Singh]

Doesn't that contradict your own argument?
I agree that Iran's air force is weak, that's a fact, but we're working on it. Our missiles can compensate our weak air force. about our naval forces, they are one of the best in the region and even the USA has confirmed so many times that they are able to close the strait of hormuz for a month which means disaster for the world economy. That means we're indeed capable of projecting power on international economy which is very important.
Let's see how many US soldiers will get killed in the years to come. I can ensure you that sooner or later we'll see uprisings in Afghanistan against the Americans.
They won't leave any troops in there if they feel that their safety is endangered. and unlike the previous time, this time they can not come back to Afghanistan under the guise of democracy. Afghanistan is a neighbor of China, which means China will have a lot to say about the US presence in her neighborhood.
Thirdly, Afghanistan is a land locked country, it has no path to the Caspian sea, Turkmenistan and Iran separate Afghanistan from the Caspian sea. Explain what you mean by controlling the Caspian sea. (They could invest in Azerbaijan instead and they're already doing that, but it's very hard to replace Russia in the Caucasus)

Doesn't that contradict your own argument?

which one?

I agree that Iran's air force is weak, that's a fact, but we're working on it. Our missiles can compensate our weak air force. about our naval forces, they are one of the best in the region and even the USA has confirmed so many times that they are able to close the strait of hormuz for a month which means disaster for the world economy. That means we're indeed capable of projecting power on international economy which is very important.

i told earlier that you have oil as weapon and it will be you who will attack the gulf in desperation

Let's see how many US soldiers will get killed in the years to come. I can ensure you that sooner or later we'll see uprisings in Afghanistan against the Americans.
They won't leave any troops in there if they feel that their safety is endangered. and unlike the previous time, this time they can not come back to Afghanistan under the guise of democracy. Afghanistan is a neighbor of China, which means China will have a lot to say about the US presence in her neighborhood.
Thirdly, Afghanistan is a land locked country, it has no path to the Caspian sea, Turkmenistan and Iran separate Afghanistan from the Caspian sea. Explain what you mean by controlling the Caspian sea. (They could invest in Azerbaijan instead and they're already doing that, but it's very hard to replace Russia in the Caucasus)

you are wrong again.U.S presence in a-stan ensures security of chinese projects and till now,u.s has not used a-stan against china so dont bring china inside here.Caspian sea is the source of energy which are yet to be xploited and can fulfill demand till hundred of years and iran is major irritant here

 

[The SC]

Iran allowed mongols to kill Arabs?Wow i don't know what to say.Iran itself suffered the most from savage mongols,a lot of big cities were destroyed and a lot of people killed.So Iran let the mongol do this to them just to punish Arabs?That's ridiculous.

Don't you know some Indians worship vipers? They like talking with venom in their mouths.
This thread is full of hatred towards Muslims in general, like every other thread where "so called Indians" get involved.
I won't be surprised to find out that these haters are some Zionists from different countries.

 

[Paan Singh]

Don't you know some Indians worship vipers? They like talking with venom in their mouths.
This thread is full of hatred towards Muslims in general, like every other thread where "so called Indians" get involved.
I won't be surprised to find out that these hater are some Zionists from different countries.

i m zionist and i told you truth.if you cant digest then its not my prob

 

[The SC]

obama dont run U.S,its pentagon..obama is mouth piece like we have mms
There were lot of things which obama wanted but still uncompleted

Congress not pentagon. And congress is full of pro Israelis, but they are being exposed to the public right now.
You sound like a know it all person. Your facts are baseless.
You are a self declared pro Zionist person, you might get a shock from the Muslim world sooner rather than later.