With steam catapults on the AC and a 12 degree ski jump, you don't need an F 414 engine for TO!
Cheers!
I don't think, the "ski-jump" is the main problem.
The main problem is "arrested-recovery" .... and within that recovery phase .... the "controlled crash".
You may note that naval aircraft don't "land" on an aircraft carrier but are "crashed" on the deck .... only that it is a "controlled crash".
Imagine a aircraft coming down as a thud and hitting the ground ..... the landing gears have to absorb the shock ... and the airframe .... and indeed each and every component should be able to withstand the impact.
Naval Tejas has a lot of value for us.. given the number of aircraft carriers in the pipeline.
I wonder if naval Tejas could take on an individual payload of atleast 1 Brahmos (700 kg weight)... if so, it will be really really useful.
Tejas has a roundtrip range of atleast 600-800 km ... add to it 300 km range of Brahmos.
Brahmos on naval Tejas would enhance the range of the deadly Brahmos to 1000 kms !!!!!
2-3 Brahmos hitting a chinese surface ship would be sufficient to sink it ... while our aircraft carriers are 1000 kms away.. considerably far away from any counter attack.
perhaps, 10 Brahmos hits on a US supercarrier ... would doom it too. Off course, if we ever need to hit a US super carrier, we will be worrying about many other things ... than the fate of the super carrier.