What's new

F18s compatible with Indian naval carrier fleet: Boeing

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
http://www.sify.com/finance/f18s-co...-fleet-boeing-news-finance-ri2rajjjgciab.html

2_img128817212236.jpg




Global defence equipment major Boeing on Monday said that its F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter aircraft is compatible with India's current naval carrier platforms and that they can be produced in the country under the government's "Make in India" initiative.

"Analytical and (computer) simulations have shown that the F/A-18 is compatible with the current carrier fleet of the Indian Navy. The results of the test have been submitted in response to a global RFI issued by the Navy," said Pratyush Kumar, President, Boeing India.

Presently, the Indian Navy's aircraft carriers' utilise "ski-jump ramps" for fighter aircraft to take-off.

Kumar spoke to IANS on the sidelines of a briefing over F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter aircraft which was held here. Boeing has filed its response to a global RFI (request for information) floated by the Indian Navy earlier this year.

Boeing is considered to be one of the major contenders for the supply of 57 carrier-borne fighter aircraft required by the Indian Navy. Company executives told IANS that the F/A-18 Super Hornet was designed for carrier operations and is "the world's pre-eminent carrier capable aircraft" with a defined US Navy flight plan to outpace threats into the 2040s.

The Indian Navy initiated the bid and issued a "RFI for Procurement of Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter for The Indian Navy" on January 31, 2017.

According to Kumar, apart from the advanced technologies, the aircraft comes with an overall life cycle cost which is more reasonable than other contenders in the bid.

"The overall life cycle cost is far lower than others," Kumar said. "The Super Hornet has the lowest cost per flight hour which is even lower than Lockheed Martin's F-16."

Dan Gillian, Vice President of F/A-18 and EA Programmes, Boeing, observed that a platform like the "Super Hornet" under the "Make in India" programme will help the Indian industry to position itself for the manufacture of "Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft" (AMCA).

"Boeing can provide the capability needed for the Indian Navy to build its next generation carrier air wing. It can also provide the industrial base right here behind that capability," Gillian said.

"When we look across the globe at quality, capability and cost - India is an obvious partner. We have been building F/A-18 aerostructures and assemblies in India because it makes good business sense to do so."

"The Super Hornet represents 21st century capability for the Indian defence forces, and industrial capability where we have evaluated 400 suppliers for the fighter campaign and have done a deep assessment on the capability of over 160 Indian suppliers," Kumar said. "We have quadrupled our sourcing from India and currently source $1 billion from India."

Gillian mentioned that the Super Hornet is ahead of its competitors because of its affordability, survivability, built-in stealth, smarter weapons and being combat proven.

Currently, the Indian Navy has two aircraft carriers -- INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat -- which are based in the Indian Ocean Region. It operates the Russian built MIG 29-K fighter aircraft from these platforms.
 
N-MMRCA selection is only between Rafale-M & F18 SH
 
boeing ko make in india me dollar dikh rhe hn lol.technology to wo denge nahy.
 
Its for new carrier going to be constructed very soon.



That's where tejas comes in. No gripen for IAF nor for Navy

The elevators on IAC-1 are too narrow for SH and Rafale.

A lot of Indians are very sure about things.
After the next press release, they are sure about something else...

Navy rejected Naval Tejas so it is not going anywhere.
Gripen M at least fits the elevators.
 
The elevators on IAC-1 are too narrow for SH and Rafale.

Iac-1 going to use Mig-29, NMMRCA for IAC-2 & IAC-3

Navy rejected Naval Tejas so it is not going anywhere.
Gripen M at least fits the elevators.

Navy never rejected Tejas. Since Navel Tejas still a prototype variant. they need upgraded one then current. So no Gripen
 
Iac-1 going to use Mig-29, NMMRCA for IAC-2 & IAC-3



Navy never rejected Tejas. Since Navel Tejas still a prototype variant. they need upgraded one then current. So no Gripen

Both INS Vikrant and INS Vikramaditya are supposed to have 26 fighters each.
Sum is 52, and IN only has 45. No more MiG-29K orders, since they have poor reliability.
Looks like the Navy is a bit short on fighters and neith F/A-18E nor Rafale can be used as is.

The current NLCA was rejected, and the designer were told to go back to the drawing board.
The Gripen M is a long shot, but still far ahead of a useful NLCA.
 
F**k the Hornet as there is no way US would agree to ToT and chances of local production are very bleak. India should either stick to Mig-29Ks or go with the Rafale-Ms so that we can produce them locally with significant ToT as there have been reports that IAF is willing to order 36 more Rafales. The procurement of spares, serviceability and maintenance issues would also ease up due to commonality and uniformity among our fleets.

As some people have pointed out that lifts are too narrow for the Rafales, if that's the case than IAC-1 could stick to Mig29s and possibly the N-LCA if that ever sees light and Rafales could be used for IAC-2 & IAC-3
 
Last edited:
Both INS Vikrant and INS Vikramaditya are supposed to have 26 fighters each.
Sum is 52, and IN only has 45. No more MiG-29K orders, since they have poor reliability.
Looks like the Navy is a bit short on fighters and neith F/A-18E nor Rafale can be used as is.

Original plan for IAC-1 is Mix of Mig -29 & Navel Tejas. so no chance for Gripen. Current NTejas is a Prototype/TD it will evolve from that.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom