What's new

Featured F/A-18 Super Hornet Is Now Undergoing Ski Jump Launch Trials For The Indian Navy

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India

F/A-18 Super Hornet Is Now Undergoing Ski Jump Launch Trials For The Indian Navy
The Boeing fighter jet is vying for an Indian Navy contract and that service only has aircraft carriers with ski jumps at present.
BY JOSEPH TREVITHICKAUGUST 19, 2020
324235325ff.jpg

NAVY
SHARE
Boeing has been flying an F/A-18E/F Super Hornet off a ground-based ski jump at Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland. This is part of a demonstration effort for the Indian Navy to show that the aircraft can operate from short take-off but arrested recovery configured (STOBAR) aircraft carriers, such as the INS Vikramaditya and the future INS Vikrant.

BOEING SAYS SUPER HORNET FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH INDIAN NAVY SKI-JUMP CARRIERSBy Tyler RogowayPosted in THE WAR ZONE
INDIA'S FIRST-EVER SUPERCARRIER MIGHT BE BASED ON THE UK'S QUEEN ELIZABETH CLASSBy Joseph TrevithickPosted in THE WAR ZONE
INDIAN NAVY MIG-29KS MAKE LOW APPROACHES TO USS NIMITZ DURING "MALABAR" DRILLSBy Tyler RogowayPosted in THE WAR ZONE
INDIA'S FIRST FRENCH-BUILT RAFALE FIGHTERS HAVE FINALLY ARRIVEDBy Jamie HunterPosted in THE WAR ZONE
BOEING SAYS INDIA AND ISRAEL ARE THE FOCUS FOR FUTURE ADVANCED F-15 EAGLE SALESBy Jamie HunterPosted in THE WAR ZONE
Indian defense analyst Saurabh Joshi was among the first to reveal the flight testing in a series of tweets on Aug. 19, 2020. The Chicago-headquartered plane maker subsequently confirmed that this ski jump demonstration program is presently taking place at Patuxent River, though it is not clear when exactly it began. The naval air station has a ground-based ski jump that it used during testing of the short and vertical takeoff and landing capable F-35B variant of the Joint Strike Fighter.

"Boeing and the U.S. Navy are in the beginning phases of operating an F/A-18 Super Hornet from a ski jump at Naval Air Station Patuxent River to demonstrate it is STOBAR compliant for the Indian Navy," Justin Gibson, a Boeing spokesperson, told The War Zone. "Boeing completed extensive analysis and more than 150 flight simulations on F/A-18 compatibility with Indian aircraft carriers, and while our assessment has shown the Block III Super Hornet is very capable of launching off a ski jump, this is the next step in demonstrating that capability. More details will be released upon the conclusion of the test demonstration."

message-editor%2F1597870910276-hornet.jpg

USN
A US Navy F/A-18E Super Hornet about to takeoff from an American supercarrier using a catapult.

The company had previously announced plans to begin this ski jump flight test program in February. It had first disclosed that it was doing simulation work on the Super Hornet's ability to operate from a STOBAR carrier in 2017.

"We've done a lot of simulation work with the Indian Navy to better understand their requirements and we fill comfortable that the Super Hornet can operate from all their carriers, both the ones fielded today and the ones in the future," Dan Gillian, Vice President of the Super Hornet program, said in an interview with Indian defense news and analysis site LiveFist in 2017. "We think we can move around the deck, be very mission capable with a relevant weapons load-out and fuel load-out to give the Navy what they need... The Super Hornet as built today can operate from Indian carriers."

McDonnell Douglas, which developed the original F/A-18 Hornet and was subsequently acquired by Boeing, had also previously conducted ski jump tests with that aircraft at the tail end of the Cold War. That testing showed that with as little as a nine-degree incline, the total required takeoff roll for the Hornet could be cut in half, though it's unclear what the jet's gross weight had to be to achieve this performance. Ski jumps generally increase the takeoff performance of combat jets in the absence of catapults and also provide an added margin of safety.

message-editor%2F1597871929236-hornet-jump.jpg

PUBLIC DOMAIN
An F/A-18A Hornet takes off from a ground-based ski jump during a test in the late 1980s.

Since at least 2016, the Indian Navy has been working to acquire a fleet of at least 57 new fighter jets to complement its existing MiG-29K Fulcrums under the Multi-Role Carrier-Borne Fighter (MRCBF) program. There have been numerous reports over the years that the Indians have been disappointed in the performance of their navalized Fulcrums.

The Super Hornet is now competing against the MiG-29K, as well as the naval version of the French-made Dassault Rafale and a variant of the Swedish Gripen. The Indian Air Force notably took delivery of the first of its land-based Rafale variants last month.

The Indian Navy had also previously rejected plans for a carrier-based version of the domestically designed Tejas, with complaints that the design was overweight, though the development of that aircraft has continued, since then. In January, the prototype landed on and took off from the INS Vikramaditya for the first time.

Being able to operate from a STOBAR carrier is a key requirement for the Indian Navy, which presently only has the one carrier, the INS Vikramaditya, which is in the configuration. A second STOBAR-configured flattop, the future INS Vikrant, and indigenous design, is also under construction.

message-editor%2F1597871146137-vikrant.jpg

INDIAN NAVY
The future INS Vikrant in 2015.

The Indian government has expressed interest in acquiring a catapult assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) carrier in the past. Last year it emerged that BAE Systems had proposed a design based on the U.K. Royal Navy's Queen Elizabeth class. The HMS Queen Elizabeth and her sister ship the HMS Prince of Wales are both short-take off and vertical landing (STOVL) types with ski jumps, but no arresting system. It's not clear whether the ship that BAE pitched to the Indians is STOBAR or CATOBAR derivative. There were CATOBAR variants of the Queen Elizabeth design among the initial proposals to the Royal Navy.

What is clear is that the Indians have plans to expand their carrier fleets, which would also require additional carrier-based aircraft. Proving that the Super Hornet, which is already CATOBAR capable, is also able to fly from STOBAR carriers could give it an advantage in the competition as India would not necessarily need to acquire multiple types to operate from different types of carriers in the future. The MiG-29K, for instance, cannot fly from CATOBAR carriers, for instance.

The Super Hornet, in its latest advanced Block III configuration, which you can read more about in detail in this past War Zone piece, is also in the running for a separate Indian Air Force fighter jet mega-contract, which is looking to acquire 126 new fighters for that service. A deal with the Indian Navy could further tip the scales toward the F/A-18E/F due to the cost benefits that India could realize from logistics, infrastructure, and supply chain commonality.

Whatever happens, it will very exciting to learn more about how the Super Hornet has been faring in these ski jump tests at Patuxent River.



https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ng-ski-jump-launch-trials-for-the-indian-navy
 
by the time they will become operational countries like china would be replacing their jets with 5 gen fighter aircrafts so f/A-18 will not benefit much to india for maintaining air superiority

Their so called 5th gen jetd are mere hoax and their fighting men of poor quality. Chinese equipment are known for their poor quality, even pakistanis trust American systems more than their Chinese platforms.
 
maintaining aircraft carrier is very expensive and india economy is not too strong to support more than 2 aircraft carriers as many rich countries like u.k,germany,france, japan and russia are facing it difficult to maintain large fleet of aircraft carriers although they have much better indigenous weapon manufacturing ability as compared to india and their public living standard is much better than india which has large number of poor population
Their so called 5th gen jetd are mere hoax and their fighting men of poor quality. Chinese equipment are known for their poor quality, even pakistanis trust American systems more than their Chinese platforms.
 
maintaining aircraft carrier is very expensive and india economy is not too strong to support more than 2 aircraft carriers as many rich countries like u.k,germany,france, japan and russia are facing it difficult to maintain large fleet of aircraft carriers although they have much better indigenous weapon manufacturing ability as compared to india and their public living standard is much better than india which has large number of poor population

we got 400 billion + in forex reserve,
spending 2 billion on a new one seems okay especially Pakistan may get the ukrainian carrier which chineese are using as china as its not happy with it.
So if Pakistan gets an aircraft carrier, we needed a minimum 3.

the MiG-29 was a point defense fighter with short legs and a moderate payload, designed to maintain air superiority around its home base/carrier. The Mig-29K has 4 Anti Ship Missiles with mediocre range (4300m) & 4 short range (3800m) F&F air to air missiles. The Mig-29K is ok at best in the Anti Ship roll and pretty bad at the ASF roll with only short range missiles.

The Super Hornet has 2 Anti Ship Missiles with good range (5600m) & 6 medium range (7000m) fire and forget air to air missiles. This makes the Super Hornet the better plane as it is a good antiship plane and an excellent ASF at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Their so called 5th gen jetd are mere hoax and their fighting men of poor quality. Chinese equipment are known for their poor quality, even pakistanis trust American systems more than their Chinese platforms.
How come it is that? okay lets say i agree with you still most of the production for western companies is done in China so if China is hoax why is production done there?
 
we got 400 billion + in forex reserve,
spending 2 billion on a new one seems okay especially Pakistan may get the ukrainian carrier which chineese are using as china as its not happy with it.
So if Pakistan gets an aircraft carrier, we needed a minimum 3.

the MiG-29 was a point defense fighter with short legs and a moderate payload, designed to maintain air superiority around its home base/carrier. The Mig-29K has 4 Anti Ship Missiles with mediocre range (4300m) & 4 short range (3800m) F&F air to air missiles. The Mig-29K is ok at best in the Anti Ship roll and pretty bad at the ASF roll with only short range missiles.

The Super Hornet has 2 Anti Ship Missiles with good range (5600m) & 6 medium range (7000m) fire and forget air to air missiles. This makes the Super Hornet the better plane as it is a good antiship plane and an excellent ASF at the same time.

It's 539 billions now
 
How come it is that? okay lets say i agree with you still most of the production for western companies is done in China so if China is hoax why is production done there?

Dude there is difference between making a smartphone and cutting edge technology weapons. Even we manufacture Apple smartphones so what's the big deal?
 
maintaining aircraft carrier is very expensive and india economy is not too strong to support more than 2 aircraft carriers as many rich countries like u.k,germany,france, japan and russia are facing it difficult to maintain large fleet of aircraft carriers although they have much better indigenous weapon manufacturing ability as compared to india and their public living standard is much better than india which has large number of poor population

I think our economy is strong enough and we will maintain those carriers. Your assessment is wrong
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom