What's new

Exciting days ahead, India will match Chinese growth rate: FM Arun Jaitley

No matter how much the growth rate will be, India will have to sustain for a very long time to match China. China is far far ahead of India in every sphere of economics. Also, its military technology is developing very fast.

Title itself says about the growth rate not over all economy...
 
Whoa brother, you have stated here and claimed to know more about us Americans than we do. Why are you shying away from telling us your profession that allows you to be so omnipotent on all matters American.

@jhungary @gambit would sure love to learn.
@gambit has many a times roundly humiliated this guy, you should stop bothering about his rants.
 
Ah yes. More foaming at the mouth.

Now Islam is a "cult" and anyone who shows that you jump into debates out of your depth is an "Islamofascist"

You don't know the history of Zionism so, without even knowing what history was being talked about, all you could offer was your rant of "Islamic history of Zionism"


That poster represents the far right fringe of Australian politics. Most of what he writes is straight from :"shock jocks" or known anti-Muslim columnists. People who live in Australia would know to whom I am referring, but you won't so you can take it any way you like.



You sub-high-school level of English is coming back to bite you.

1. I wrote that I and any number of posters on this forum had exposed your charade.
2. That thread, and people's responses to your comments, are still there. Interested parties can read the thread.
3. Wrong. You asked me about the history of Zionism because you didn't know.
4. People can look up your threads about Palestine/Israel. Your rant about "To the Chinese" thread was opened only last week or so where you singled out Chinese posters, even though all nationalities engage in similar behavior...

Just because you keep spouting nonsense and pandering to some demographic doesn't mean you are building up credibility. Quite the opposite.

1. You wrote what? You claimed something on basis of what Chinese dragon said and I'm yet to see my statement that qualifies it.

2. "That thread" - people have different views on many topics, but since you called it laughable, show me what you found laughable.

3. Can you show me where I mentioned that I don't know about Zionism and or was needing of your help OR did I simply ask what is your view on it/ how do you see it being interpreted?

4. You make specific claims about me, if challenged you come back with " people can look". Prove your claims.

Now over multiple posts when asked to prove you claims, claims that nobody twisted your arms to make, you obviously cannot.
 
Last edited:
Does a 7-11 clerk in Detroit know more "about America" than a Russian who studied American history? Does a janitor in Los Angeles know more "about America" than a German who studied American politics?
So what have you studied?

You are here authenticating the do's and dont's in the intellectual realm for being classified as state department professional based on hong kong, zionism and crimea...

you also claim @jhungary @gambit as looser parade,
I hope you are not going to clasify these members as impostors too, because I have seen their technical "content", and I would love to see you authenticate their content .... That would be fun to see.

don't take this personally but your rhetoric is treading on thin ice...
 
1. You wrote what? You claimed something on basis of what Chinese dragon said and I'm yet to see my statement that qualifies it.

He is from Hong Kong and he called you out on some very basic fallacies about Hong Kong.

You are yet to see anything,

2. "That thread" - people have different views on many topics, but since you called it laughable, show me what you found laughable.

What I found laughable is your naive analysis of the Ukraine situation and how you failed to list any of the subtleties involved about various parties' reaction. Subtleties which have been discussed any number of times on this forum. And your omissions were not for the sake of brevity. You wrote a lengthy piece. Too bad it was so simplistic.

3. Can you show me where I mentioned that I don't know about Zionism and or was needing your help OR did I simply ask what is your view on it/ how do you see interpreted it?

Wrong again.
I mentioned the history of Zionism and you had no clue what was afoot.
Anyone who has studied the evolution of Zionism would not need to ask such a basic question:.

4. You make specific claims about me, if challenged you come back with " people can look". Prove your claims.

Do you seriously deny that your recently opened the "To the Chinese" thread about a one-sided rant?

Seriously?
 
My profession doesn't require "insider" knowledge of geopolitics. Not do I claim such insider access.
Last I checked, ordinary people could travel all over the world, and live and work, as long as they had a valid visa.

Does your sub-high-school level of English competence not know what the term "insider information" means?

As for "knowing" America, you don't get to "know" America just because you hopped on a plane there. If you sit on your azz and not learn the relevant facts, then you will know less than someone who has studied the relevant subject. Only a lazy fool would claim super knowledge just because he is physically present in America.

Does a 7-11 clerk in Detroit know more "about America" than a Russian who studied American history? Does a janitor in Los Angeles know more "about America" than a German who studied American politics?



Calling in the loser parade to shore up the ranks and fight your battles for you?

Wait, did you not call chinese dragon to support the claims you've made here and on his behalf? Why are you getting upset if I call what obviously many have said here, as the ones who summarily caught you being a fraud.

Based on your views , I would think most of our janitors and 7-11 guys know more about America over you. .
 
Last edited:
So what have you studied?

I have studied a wide range of subjects from history to politics to media to economics to various scientific fields. When I make a claim, it is based on public knowledge, and anyone with sufficient background is welcome to present counterarguments. There is no claim of insider knowledge.

You are here authenticating the do's and dont's in the intellectual realm for being classified as state department professional based on hong kong, zionism and crimea...

There are certain facts which are known about these regions. If someone presents an analysis which doesn't even live up to public knowledge, let along "insider" knowledge, then their boast of "insider" knowledge can be challenged.

you also claim @jhungary @gambit as looser parade,
I hope you are not going to clasify these members as impostors too, because I have seen their technical "content", and I would love to see you authenticate their content as false..... That would be fun to see.

I don't question their views on military matters, unless there is contradictory public information.

I do challenge their claims when they stray outside their realm and into discussion domains where they cannot claim special privilege. On those matters, everyone needs to back their claims by references and, when failed to do so, their argument is rejected.

don't take this personally but your rhetoric is treading on thin ice...

Don't worry.
I don't take anything from you seriously.

Wait, did you not call chinese dragon to support the claims you've made here and on his behalf on him? Why are you getting upset if I call what obviously many have said here, as the ones who summarily caught you being a fraud. .

I mentioned Chinese-Dragon because YOU asked me to list who else had debunked your claims on State Dept.

Based on your views , I would think most of our janitors and 7-11 guys know more about America over you. .

I am sure you "would think" a lot of things.
What they have to do with reality is anyone's guess.
 
I'm American. And everyone can tell that you are an Indian. Just give up and put your Indian flag up there next to your made up name.

Really??
Americans dont give a shit about such news about India.There would be no false flag Pakistanis in here because this is a Pak Forum.
So you are a genuine.Your low IQ troll posts again firming thay conclusion.


On topic:FM pointed China as an example because they are the only major nation in the world that experience double digit growth .We are in the process of reformation that would spike up our growth again to the more than 9.6% .
But some others especially neighbours cant tolerate that.
 
Yeah it only happend in just twelve year 2003 china were 1.8 trillion economy now it's 10 trillion with correct reforms Indian economy can also get growth at same speed.Right now India is on reforming stage like Chinese were in 2003.

1.8 trillion in 2003 is totally different from 1.8 trillion in 2014.

1.8 trillion USD in 2003 can buy you tons of stuff。

1.8 trillion USD in 2014 buys you a lot less。
 
He is from Hong Kong and he called you out on some very basic fallacies about Hong Kong.

You are yet to see anything,

But you made the claim, why can't you substantiate his and yours on what I supposedly said?

What I found laughable is your naive analysis of the Ukraine situation and how you failed to list any of the subtleties involved about various parties' reaction. Subtleties which have been discussed any number of times on this forum. And your omissions were not for the sake of brevity. You wrote a lengthy piece. Too bad it was so simplistic.

So it should be easy, yet you find it so difficult to point to one within. All you have done here is wordplay. How many times do you have to be hit on your head asking to substantiate any of your claims, you've found laughable


Wrong again.
I mentioned the history of Zionism and you had no clue what was afoot.
Anyone who has studied the evolution of Zionism would not need to ask such a basic question:.

Can you show any proof within my question that begged any ignorance on my part and on the said topic. Why are you repeatedly finding it so difficult to substantiate your claims?

Do you seriously deny that your recently opened the "To the Chinese" thread about a one-sided rant?
So we are now down to the "chinese" are we? What everyone calls you as being a lackey of. What happened to claiming that I was an anti pakistani, arab and palestine?

Yes, I'm seriously denying your claim I'm anti chinese. That post in question was specific about the posters I see here. You think addressing vietnamese or filipino women as " whores" is acceptable? Do you think calling people out on the their countries social status or their personal wealth is acceptable? OR do you think making fun of a race, based on the color of their skin is acceptable?

Apparently you do, now that you think you are one of us. ;)

My very 1st post about 'China' here ridiculed people who thought their economy was all going to come crashing down, and to those who challenged their growth as being real. I've not written much about China as a country other than one view on how they see Kashmir. For you come out with the allegation that I'm Anti China, shows your shiny knee pads over the truth.
 
Last edited:
@US_statedept_retired

You are once again demonstrating your struggles with the English language.

I have spelled out WHY your analysis on Crimea was lacking, WHY you had no clue on Zionism, WHY you singled out Chinese on behavior exhibited by all nationalities. I mentioned the relevant threads. On Hong Kong, I will take CD's word for it for I only glanced at that thread.

Just because you keep typing won't make your posting history go away. Neither will it improve your credibility.

I know your posting pattern and emotional outbursts in your previous login, and I have to admit you are doing a better job of hiding your background under this login.

You are learning...
 
@US_statedept_retired

You are once again demonstrating your struggles with the English language.

I have spelled out WHY your analysis on Crimea was lacking, WHY you had no clue on Zionism, WHY you singled out Chinese on behavior exhibited by all nationalities. On Hong Kong, I will take CD's word for it for I only glanced at that thread.

Just because you keep typing won't make your posting history go away. Neither will it improve your credibility.

I know your posting pattern and emotional outbursts in your previous login, and I have to admit you are doing a better job of hiding your background under this login.

You are learning...

I figured you out. Other than personal attacks directed towards me, whenever I've asked you to simply substantiate your claims and over multiple posts, you have chosen to use rhetoric in place. You have not ONCE quoted any of my statements, backing up your assertions. You Sir are nothing but a fraud, who goes about insulting others because of your need to desperately fit in.

Have a nice day.
 
I figured you out. Other than personal attacks directed towards me, whenever I've asked you simply substantiate your claims over multiple posts, you have chosen to use rhetoric in place. You have not ONCE quoted any of my statements, backing up your assertions. You Sir are nothing but a fraud, who goes about insulting others because of your need to desperately fit in.

Have a nice day.

People with a middling grasp of English (that leaves you out) can read when a specific thread is mentioned in reference to a point.

And there is nothing 'personal' about challenging claims of 'insider' knowledge.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom