SledgeHammer
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 491
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
9 pages of personal attack and abuses led by a think tank, and not even 9 posts on the topic so far. What a thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't really know what started this, and how this got out of control, but guys, 9 pages just to debate if @US_statedept_retired is an Indian or Did he ever worked in US State Department?? You guys have way to much time on your hand....lol
Let's for argument sake, he is an ethnic Indian (Not American Indian) and He does not ever worked for US State Department. SO WHAT?? Honestly, so what??
I found it even more interesting that Mr D used to accuse me of railroading other member in this forum, yet he is now doing the same thing lol
If someone claims that they have "insider knowledge" about a subject. then that claim is part of their content. That claim is subject to debate and critique.
If someone claims to be an aeronautical engineer and their content casts doubt about their knowledge on the subject, then that background is called into question.
Disputing someone's qualification is not the same as your phony tantrums which were demolished by simple links to official websites.
Don't try and make analogies you don't understand. It may please the usual suspects, but it only makes you look sillier than usual.
What qualification do you need to post in PDF? And what kind of title do you need to post in PDF??
So, if I claim to be an aeronautical engineering, what I said must be sound in aeronautical term? And who will be judging this and tell me what this is and why that is not professional talk?
When you doubt someone else qualification, you either have the same amount of similar experience of the accuse or you worked where the accused work in order for you to able to claim he is a fake. And did you work 30 years in the US State Department so you can claim he is a fake? Or you manage to track his real name and asked the State Department that whether or not he work for them??
Unless you are in a real position (either have connection or worked what he claim he worked for yourselves) you are in no position (Regardless how you claim your knowledge is) to judge any member and their qualification simply because we cannot authenticate your qualification either. How do we know if you are or are not up for the job??
Tell me this, if he is an Indian, what does that even mean? So his post is less valid if he is an Indian? Or if his post or his view is less valid if he does not work for US State Department? Dude, then if you think so, we probably need to ask the administrator to close the forum tomorrow as none of us, have the "Qualification" to post here.
Again, it would be a totally different story if the forum pay for @US_statedept_retired for his exclusive information or opinion. But dude, he is like us, just a fellow poster, so, what he claim he is and what did he say does not have any affiliation, for all I know and all I care, you claim to be a Pakistani living in Australia, how do I know otherwise?? Then should we start 9 pages and trying to determine if you are a Pakistani living in Australia? Because for all I know you could be anyone living in Anywhere.
Then while we are at it, why don't we start a forum-wise lookup??
You have a habit of writing long-winded rants which say absolutely nothing. Certainly the Indians will applaud your long-winded tantrums, but no one else will have the patience to read your blabbering inanities.
Stick to writing long homilies about military life. A certain demographic loves those types of articles and you can pat yourself on the back.
If you don't understand how a fraudster can give away his lack of knowledge on a subject -- and you clearly haven't a clue, much like most other things -- then no one can teach it to you. If an aeronautical engineer doesn't know what a pitot tube is, or what Bernouilli's Principle is, then we can be pretty sure he is not quite an aeronautical engineer.
Read the threads where his ineptitude has been exposed before wasting anyone's time -- certainly not mine.
Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so?? Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??
Show me where I asked for him to be banned?
If he is found to be using a duplicate ID, then that's a cause for banning, but I expect he is smart enough to fool the system.
Once again, he is free to claim whatever he wants, and we are free to express our skepticism about his claims.
What part of this simple English sentence do you have trouble understanding?
I am sure you will continue with your inane essays which, again, say absolutely nothing new but will please your Indian audience here. You have demonstrated your petty ego which needs stroking at every turn, and I am sure the Indian brigade here will oblige.
Show me where did I say you wish him to be banned??
Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so?? Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??
Do you need to buy reading glasses or a dictionary? Or perhaps memory pills?
What is that last sentence of yours about revoking privileges?
Why are you asking me about revoking privileges when I never asked for such a thing?
Why should I comment on what other people want or don't want?
The rest of your post, as always, is filler -- safely ignored.
dude, then you probably need to buy a dictionary.
What is the question mark means at the end of a sentence?
Wow, I don't know man, for someone who keep passing judgment on other English, yet he don't know why I put that "Statement" into "Question"
So this "You are a Ghost?" will this carry the same meaning as "You are a Ghost.", I don't know man, you tell me. As you say your English is A LOT better than me.
My English is better than yours, which is why you failed to word your question properly.
You should have added a qualifier "as others have demanded".
In the absence of such a qualifier, and since the rest of your posts involved comments made by me, the implication is that this particular comment was also made by me.
Context is everything. Your question lacks attribution and is, therefore, ambiguous. In the absence of explicit attribution, the logical choice is to extend the context of the ongoing conversation into that particular question also.
Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so??
Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??
dude, are you for real??
I am entirely for real and I am really enjoying your desperate dance of evasion when your pidgin English got you into trouble once again.
Your long winded rant avoids the issue of context. Read my post above about what is context and why it dominates interpretation of any communication.
I expect it will be a Herculean task for you, and I am not holding my breath.
As always, I enjoy you broadcasting your desperation to the readers by calling in the cavalry to help you out in a tight spot.
Petty and predictable.
And comical.