What's new

Exciting days ahead, India will match Chinese growth rate: FM Arun Jaitley

I don't really know what started this, and how this got out of control, but guys, 9 pages just to debate if @US_statedept_retired is an Indian or Did he ever worked in US State Department?? You guys have way to much time on your hand....lol

Let's for argument sake, he is an ethnic Indian (Not American Indian) and He does not ever worked for US State Department. SO WHAT?? Honestly, so what??

Did his post not worth reading because he is an Indian or he was not from the US State Department? Or You have to be like your user name suggest? Then I did not work for Hungry Jack either, should I change my user name too??

This is an open forum, everyone entitle to their own opinion, and everyone entitle to their own back story, in an open forum, everyone is equal, I stand by the shit @Superboy wrote time and again and did me or anyone ever wrote to him "Hey, you are not a superboy and your post is crap, stop posting?" So what if @US_statedept_retired is an Indian or If he not ever work in US State Department? Does that mean we have to revoke his right to post? Or He have to brace all this, 9 pages of criticism every time he post?

Here in this forum, you debate the man's point, not the man credential, where he is coming from and what did he do does not have anything related to how his point being valid or not, I can say I am a lot of thing, in the end of the day, people recognize the stuff that I said, not what I said I am. How do you know I am a Military Professional? I did not go out and broadcast that I used to serve this and that, or I don't forward my CV so everyone can see. People recognize what I said and I know something that only people served knows, which are not available to general public.

Beside, being a former soldier does that make me an expert of warfare? No, I fought war, yes, I lead troop, but that only mean I have the experience on that, but I am not god of war, i can tell you how I think, you can take it as it is, but in the end of the day, what works for me may not be working for you, even if you are talking about my own experience.

So come back to a point, what he is,, and what he say he is, is not relevant in this forum, and NONE OF US IS AT BETTER POSITION TO JUDGE A FELLOW MEMBER

I found it even more interesting that Mr D used to accuse me of railroading other member in this forum, yet he is now doing the same thing lol
 
I don't really know what started this, and how this got out of control, but guys, 9 pages just to debate if @US_statedept_retired is an Indian or Did he ever worked in US State Department?? You guys have way to much time on your hand....lol

Let's for argument sake, he is an ethnic Indian (Not American Indian) and He does not ever worked for US State Department. SO WHAT?? Honestly, so what??

If someone claims that they have "insider knowledge" about a subject. then that claim is part of their content. That claim is subject to debate and critique.

If someone claims to be an aeronautical engineer and their content casts doubt about their knowledge on the subject, then that background is called into question.

I found it even more interesting that Mr D used to accuse me of railroading other member in this forum, yet he is now doing the same thing lol

Disputing someone's qualification is not the same as your phony tantrums which were demolished by simple links to official websites.

Don't try and make analogies you don't understand. It may please the usual suspects, but it only makes you look sillier than usual.
 
If someone claims that they have "insider knowledge" about a subject. then that claim is part of their content. That claim is subject to debate and critique.

If someone claims to be an aeronautical engineer and their content casts doubt about their knowledge on the subject, then that background is called into question.

Disputing someone's qualification is not the same as your phony tantrums which were demolished by simple links to official websites.

Don't try and make analogies you don't understand. It may please the usual suspects, but it only makes you look sillier than usual.

What qualification do you need to post in PDF? And what kind of title do you need to post in PDF??

So, if I claim to be an aeronautical engineering, what I said must be sound in aeronautical term? And who will be judging this and tell me what this is and why that is not professional talk?

When you doubt someone else qualification, you either have the same amount of similar experience of the accuse or you worked where the accused work in order for you to able to claim he is a fake. And did you work 30 years in the US State Department so you can claim he is a fake? Or you manage to track his real name and asked the State Department that whether or not he work for them??

Unless you are in a real position (either have connection or worked what he claim he worked for yourselves) you are in no position (Regardless how you claim your knowledge is) to judge any member and their qualification simply because we cannot authenticate your qualification either. How do we know if you are or are not up for the job??

Tell me this, if he is an Indian, what does that even mean? So his post is less valid if he is an Indian? Or if his post or his view is less valid if he does not work for US State Department? Dude, then if you think so, we probably need to ask the administrator to close the forum tomorrow as none of us, have the "Qualification" to post here.

Again, it would be a totally different story if the forum pay for @US_statedept_retired for his exclusive information or opinion. But dude, he is like us, just a fellow poster, so, what he claim he is and what did he say does not have any affiliation, for all I know and all I care, you claim to be a Pakistani living in Australia, how do I know otherwise?? Then should we start 9 pages and trying to determine if you are a Pakistani living in Australia? Because for all I know you could be anyone living in Anywhere.

Then while we are at it, why don't we start a forum-wise lookup??
 
What qualification do you need to post in PDF? And what kind of title do you need to post in PDF??

So, if I claim to be an aeronautical engineering, what I said must be sound in aeronautical term? And who will be judging this and tell me what this is and why that is not professional talk?

When you doubt someone else qualification, you either have the same amount of similar experience of the accuse or you worked where the accused work in order for you to able to claim he is a fake. And did you work 30 years in the US State Department so you can claim he is a fake? Or you manage to track his real name and asked the State Department that whether or not he work for them??

Unless you are in a real position (either have connection or worked what he claim he worked for yourselves) you are in no position (Regardless how you claim your knowledge is) to judge any member and their qualification simply because we cannot authenticate your qualification either. How do we know if you are or are not up for the job??

Tell me this, if he is an Indian, what does that even mean? So his post is less valid if he is an Indian? Or if his post or his view is less valid if he does not work for US State Department? Dude, then if you think so, we probably need to ask the administrator to close the forum tomorrow as none of us, have the "Qualification" to post here.

Again, it would be a totally different story if the forum pay for @US_statedept_retired for his exclusive information or opinion. But dude, he is like us, just a fellow poster, so, what he claim he is and what did he say does not have any affiliation, for all I know and all I care, you claim to be a Pakistani living in Australia, how do I know otherwise?? Then should we start 9 pages and trying to determine if you are a Pakistani living in Australia? Because for all I know you could be anyone living in Anywhere.

Then while we are at it, why don't we start a forum-wise lookup??

You have a habit of writing long-winded rants which say absolutely nothing. Certainly the Indians will applaud your long-winded tantrums, but no one else will have the patience to read your blabbering inanities.

Stick to writing long homilies about military life. A certain demographic loves those types of articles and you can pat yourself on the back.

If you don't understand how a fraudster can give away his lack of knowledge on a subject -- and you clearly haven't a clue, much like most other things -- then no one can teach it to you. If an aeronautical engineer doesn't know what a pitot tube is, or what Bernouilli's Principle is, then we can be pretty sure he is not quite an aeronautical engineer.

Read the threads where his ineptitude has been exposed before wasting anyone's time -- certainly not mine.
 
Last edited:
You have a habit of writing long-winded rants which say absolutely nothing. Certainly the Indians will applaud your long-winded tantrums, but no one else will have the patience to read your blabbering inanities.

Stick to writing long homilies about military life. A certain demographic loves those types of articles and you can pat yourself on the back.

If you don't understand how a fraudster can give away his lack of knowledge on a subject -- and you clearly haven't a clue, much like most other things -- then no one can teach it to you. If an aeronautical engineer doesn't know what a pitot tube is, or what Bernouilli's Principle is, then we can be pretty sure he is not quite an aeronautical engineer.

Read the threads where his ineptitude has been exposed before wasting anyone's time -- certainly not mine.

lol, dude, so, that's your baseline?

My sister is a CPA (Certified Practices Accountant) yet she have struggle when she have to make a cash flow statement. If and when she made the wrong assumption in a cash flow statement, then should we all doubt whether or not she have an accountant degree from Macquarie Uni?

My brother is a Mechanical Engineer and have a Mech. Eng. degree with UCLA, yet he is struggling (actually he have no idea) on how to fix a car, anything about a car. Then should his employer "Boeing Aeronautic" look into his education and see if he actually have the degree?

Dude, ever heard of benefit of the doubt? How do you make sense of this statement

"If an aeronautical engineer doesn't know what a pitot tube is, or what Bernouilli's Principle is, then we can be pretty sure he is not quite an aeronautical engineer."

So you asked all Aeronautical Engineer in this world and verified that they all know about pitot tube or bernouilli's principle? So that you can be sure no aeronautical engineer don't know about this stuff??Because that is the only way you can take out the benefit of the doubt and that's beyond doubt that he would not be an aeronautical engineer if he don't know about that Or if this is your own view that he would not be if he don't know that, then may I ask what is your qualification to set such a baseline??

Well, then I forgot you are a all knowing Mr D. so you probably sense that he is a fake already and do not need nor require to tell us how lol

Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so?? Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??
 
Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so?? Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??

Ignoring the rest of your long-winded rant, which is a repetition of your previous babbling, and a tacit admission that you have no clue about the subject being discussed, I will answer this specific question.

Show me where I asked for him to be banned?

If he is found to be using a duplicate ID, then that's a cause for banning, but I expect he is smart enough to fool the system.

Once again, he is free to claim whatever he wants, and we are free to express our skepticism about his claims.

What part of this simple English sentence do you have trouble understanding?

I am sure you will continue with your inane essays which, again, say absolutely nothing new but will please your Indian audience here. You have demonstrated your petty ego which needs stroking at every turn, and I am sure the Indian brigade here will oblige.
 
Show me where I asked for him to be banned?

Show me where did I say you wish him to be banned??

If he is found to be using a duplicate ID, then that's a cause for banning, but I expect he is smart enough to fool the system.

Then would that be the mod jobs? Not yours? WHat you need to do is to tag a mod and ask if he is using multiple ID, nit like you start 20 post accusing him of not being something he claim to be


Once again, he is free to claim whatever he wants, and we are free to express our skepticism about his claims.

What part of this simple English sentence do you have trouble understanding?

I am sure you will continue with your inane essays which, again, say absolutely nothing new but will please your Indian audience here. You have demonstrated your petty ego which needs stroking at every turn, and I am sure the Indian brigade here will oblige.

lol, I am not the one starting this remember, you call on him on your "So-called" suspicious which cannot be proven, yet you are dead set against him and calling him an Indian and Not who he claim he is, I just hit you with two question

1.)How do you know for sure?
2.)Even if you are correct, does it matter?

Which both question is not being answered, yet you keep calling me the one with petty ego? Lol.

Bravo. Just Bravo

lol, again, you need to relax dude, not all people here have some grudge against you. Did you take my advice and get some kitty?? But whatever you do, don't get the grumpy cat lol, cos it wouldn't help much on the problem.
 
Show me where did I say you wish him to be banned??

Do you need to buy reading glasses or a dictionary? Or perhaps memory pills?

Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so?? Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??

What is that last sentence of yours about revoking privileges?

Why are you asking me about revoking privileges when I never asked for such a thing?

Why should I comment on what other people want or don't want?

The rest of your post, as always, is filler -- safely ignored.
 
Do you need to buy reading glasses or a dictionary? Or perhaps memory pills?



What is that last sentence of yours about revoking privileges?

Why are you asking me about revoking privileges when I never asked for such a thing?

Why should I comment on what other people want or don't want?

The rest of your post, as always, is filler -- safely ignored.

dude, then you probably need to buy a dictionary.

What is the question mark means at the end of a sentence?

Wow, I don't know man, for someone who keep passing judgment on other English, yet he don't know why I put that "Statement" into "Question"

So this "You are a Ghost?" will this carry the same meaning as "You are a Ghost.", I don't know man, you tell me. As you say your English is A LOT better than me.
 
Really ?

Chinese growth is on a downward spree and seems it would settle down in the sub 5-6% range after decades of spectacular growth. So now India will match chinese growth rate before even taking off ?

Is it just me or it actually sounds funny and logically stupid ?
 
dude, then you probably need to buy a dictionary.

What is the question mark means at the end of a sentence?

Wow, I don't know man, for someone who keep passing judgment on other English, yet he don't know why I put that "Statement" into "Question"

So this "You are a Ghost?" will this carry the same meaning as "You are a Ghost.", I don't know man, you tell me. As you say your English is A LOT better than me.

My English is better than yours, which is why you failed to word your question properly.
You should have added a qualifier "as others have demanded".
In the absence of such a qualifier, and since the rest of your posts involved comments made by me, the implication is that this particular comment was also made by me.

Context is everything. Your question lacks attribution and is, therefore, ambiguous. In the absence of explicit attribution, the logical choice is to extend the context of the ongoing conversation into that particular question also.
 
My English is better than yours, which is why you failed to word your question properly.
You should have added a qualifier "as others have demanded".
In the absence of such a qualifier, and since the rest of your posts involved comments made by me, the implication is that this particular comment was also made by me.

Context is everything. Your question lacks attribution and is, therefore, ambiguous. In the absence of explicit attribution, the logical choice is to extend the context of the ongoing conversation into that particular question also.

dude, are you for real??

You asked "Show me where I asked for him to be banned?"
I said "Show me where did I say you wish him to be banned??"
Then you show me this

Beside, you still have not explain to me why is it matter that if he is lying or not? Okay, even I believe you, he is lying, he is an indian and he never worked for US State Department, so??
Should his posting privilege be revoke for that or??

Since when did a question (An open one) become a statement?

What I ask was so what you going to do about it? DO YOU WANT HIS POSTING PREVILIGE REVOKE or ?? (What do you want??)

Now, I don't know about you, but the possible answer is either a Yes - I want him to be banned. Or No - I don'
t. Now tell me, is it logical to say "Show me where I asked for him to be banned?"

Now, if you ask show me where I want him to be banned, that mean at some point I made a statement saying you want him to be ban, or people want him to be ban. But when I ask you where did I ever made that "Statement" you quote me a question I asked.

Lol and then you accuse me of bad English, and fail to word my question properly?

Dude, even a sixth grade student will tell you The use of the word "Should" follow by a sentence and follow by a question mark IS A QUESTION, NOT A STATEMENT. If my English is bad in your standard, then I don't want to be in your standard to begin with lol

Well, I get it, your Englis is GOODER them me...And I don't know how to write, lol. it's time for you to say "I win" and move on...

@gambit @US_statedept_retired @sandy_3126 come join the fun and have some laugh
 
dude, are you for real??

I am entirely for real and I am really enjoying your desperate dance of evasion when your pidgin English got you into trouble once again.

Your long winded rant avoids the issue of context. Read my post above about what is context and why it dominates interpretation of any communication.

I expect it will be a Herculean task for you, and I am not holding my breath.

As always, I enjoy you broadcasting your desperation to the readers by calling in the cavalry to help you out in a tight spot.

Petty and predictable.
And comical.
 
I am entirely for real and I am really enjoying your desperate dance of evasion when your pidgin English got you into trouble once again.

Your long winded rant avoids the issue of context. Read my post above about what is context and why it dominates interpretation of any communication.

I expect it will be a Herculean task for you, and I am not holding my breath.

As always, I enjoy you broadcasting your desperation to the readers by calling in the cavalry to help you out in a tight spot.

Petty and predictable.
And comical.

lol, so no answer from you then. Beside I am a pathetic and petty guy. So if you are going to call me name without any sound and found evidence, why bother going here and there trying to dodge anything I ask? You should just do what troll do and accuse me of being petty and pathetic without any reason and get it over with.

All the question I ask has not been address and answered, in place with answer is just I am this and I am that. LOL

But you are right about one thing, it's actually been fun and comical arguing with you. lol
 

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom