Shapur
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
One of the terms of the treaty of Durand line and the Afghan government states that " In order for the treaty to be valid, it has to be re signed or re agreed each time there is a change of government in either country". That's the reason, the treaty was first, signed by Abdul Rahman Khan, then renewed by Habibullah Khan, then Amanullah khan as they became the rulers of Afghanistan. This is a requirement in the terms of the treaty. Now once British India was dissolved and Pakistan came into being, that meant a change in the ruler unless you count Pakistan as a continuiation of British India. Afghanistan and Pakistan have no agreement on Durand line, and the treaty was never renewed by Zahir Shah or Pakistani rulers, so as per the terms of the treaty itself. It's null and void. This is the main argument from the Afghan side and justified to some extent.