AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
50 Aircraft killer missiles would also be welcomed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would give u a better answer but this would derail the thread..... The thing Why PN cant maintain the carrier is evident from ur reply. Ya U need to protect them. When War breaks U will have headache in protecting it.It wont be an advantage, since losing one gets to be a pretty big insult look at the Indian Aircraft Carrier during 71 war PN sent missions to search and destroy the AC of IN they hid the beast from us, we were offered an AC by France in mid 70s when ZAB visited France, but ZAB declined the offer since it would have been trouble keeping it maintained and keeping it out of the reach of the enemy, he told the than PM of France to offer it to China instead but even they declined it. An AC is advantage if you have the know how but if you don't its just a burden on the entire navy, the IN has been repairing this rust since they had it, its no good.
AC Carrier is not good for PN n PAF. Where we would place it in SEA
We have hidden , portable Airports in Makran, KALAT, Hyerabad n MeerporKhas.......Which are more dangerous then AC Carrier.
Dont forget AC Carrier maintenance cost is to high......+ A single stealth cruise missile (RAAD) enough to do the job
I would give u a better answer but this would derail the thread..... The thing Why PN cant maintain the carrier is evident from ur reply. Ya U need to protect them. When War breaks U will have headache in protecting it.
Its not the capability.... Why do we need it? Too much assets spending thier energy to protect a carrier? When you are already well within the reach of your enemy then what is the need of it?Buddy, if a navy is determined to protect its AC....they can do it....
Trust me, PN has that capability even now....the only factor is $$$....
Cheers!!!
Its not the capability.... When you are already well within the reach of your enemy then what is the need of it?
Why do we need it?
Too much assets spending thier energy to protect a carrier?
New Recruit
i think mini aircraft carrier will be suitable for pn
No one is "not within" the reach of their enemies....that is the rule of a war....you have to take risks....
They dont need it....and that was my whole point when i said...."the only factor is $$$"....
I said earlier, its not logical for them to go for an AC....but if they do, they would know better how to protect it, they certainly have the capability to do so....they wont be leaving that as a showpiece in the middle of nowhere....
Cheers!!!
why u wanna steal it???...LOLfrom where....
An aircraft carrier is an offense weapon.Considering that Pakistan military is groomed to fight a bigger opponent its important that yu develop defence capabilities.For example f 16 acquired by your air force.It will never truly last if an all out air war breaks out but on the other hand if you had invested in an integrated air defence system it will make your adversary think twice before attacking
the situation your facing is much similar to what Germany faced in world war 2 , she had to go up against the royal navy the most powerful one then.Germany invested heavily in u boats which helped her to stand on her feet.A similar approach is what you should be thinking
shaaabaash
---------- Post added at 12:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:16 AM ----------
just like pajero-mini???