What's new

CNN Interview with Imran Khan: Assassination Attempt on the ex-Prime Minister by the Establishment and PDM

I think since 1951 it's not Pakistani democracy, it's a Pentagon-GHQ relationship. When the best wine collection used to deliver from US for Gen Ayub Khan. For some reason US is more comfortable with dictatorships and especially military ones.
As far as GHQ and pentagon relation goes, it should be kept that way. No US political office holder should be meeting a Pakistani army personnels but the defense minister instead.

When do you ever see a pakistani politician meeting US chief of staff.
US always knew who holds power in Pakistan's governance system. Why waste time with meeting people with no say in state matters.
Cant blame US for pakistans own mistakes.
 
moron e ahzam wins:

his demand that Gen. Bajwa should remain the COAS until after the next election is being considered.

both the fat chor and naqli imam e ahzam are in agreement on this without consulting showbaaz who is now on his way to England to dissuade the fat pandit from cooperating with Khan.
 
Last edited:
What is funny is that people like me who exercise independent and fair judgements are subjected to vicious attacks and ridiculed. As if that will change anything. :D

Don't be a LOTA then! You'll be called out for your hypocrisy.
 
Some just look at Indians and decide to give up. Point is to not give up.

A US Department of State spokesman told a journalist that US have separate and important relationship with Pakistan.

Pakistani diaspora in USA is rich and well-settled. It has NOT realized its political capacity yet.

@PakFactor
@SQ8
@AgNoStiC MuSliM

I will respond to this tonight, headed to the hospital. My first child will be born today. Make dua.
 
"What is your evidence, Sir?"

He presented none. He even backtracked on the number of people he accused, and accused the intelligence agency of videos, Very interesting.
Evidence is gathered from investigation ... Allegation is made by the person based on his experiences and past relationship ...

In every murder investigation first person to investigate is the person who gave threats ... PDM gave life threat to him publicaly ...
 
Evidence is gathered from investigation ... Allegation is made by the person based on his experiences and past relationship ...

In every murder investigation first person to investigate is the person who gave threats ... PDM gave life threat to him publicaly ...

Where in this process does the person making accusations have the right to demand resignations of those he accuses?
 
Where in this process does the person making accusations have the right to demand resignations of those he accuses?
When all the investigation agencies would be under the people said person is accusing. Either they resign or someone above their head makes the investigation
 
Where in this process does the person making accusations have the right to demand resignations of those he accuses?
Obviously if they r not letting put the name in FIR which is as per law then will they let the investgators investigate on merit ?
 
Obviously if they r not letting put the name in FIR which is as per law then will they let the investgators investigate on merit ?

Obviously, the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of judging whether the FIR is according to the law in Pakistan or not. If the SC is okay with it, the FIR is perfectly legal.
 
Obviously, the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of judging whether the FIR is according to the law in Pakistan or not. If the SC is okay with it, the FIR is perfectly legal.
Where did supreme court said he is ok ?
 
Where did supreme court said he is ok ?

Not happened yet, so we must wait for their determination on this (that is why I clearly said "IF the SC is okay"). Leaving such a legal matter to the highest court in the land is entirely appropriate, whichever way they may rule on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom