Akh1112
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2019
- Messages
- 1,138
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
What’s your point, the Barak 8 has limitations too yes, it doesn’t remove the limitations of the hq-16 though.
atleast barak 8 is arh and does not rely on soviet era illuminators to guide what is an absurdly heavy and outdated point defence missile.
Once again, if you want to see what a proper PD Sam should look like, take a peek at ESSM or CAMM/ER.
Fire rate is irrelevant when you can’t guide them. Go for it, dump all 32 missiles, can only guide 2 per illuminator though.
The air search radar is modern sure, the sr2410c is a brand new aesa, however as I have said before, that’s not the issue.
atleast barak 8 is arh and does not rely on soviet era illuminators to guide what is an absurdly heavy and outdated point defence missile.
Once again, if you want to see what a proper PD Sam should look like, take a peek at ESSM or CAMM/ER.
The theoretical rate of fire of MK41 is 1s per.
rate of fire of HQ16:
2007 Edition is 16s per
2009 Edition is 5s per
2011 Edition is 4s per
……
HQ9B (052D) is 1s per
Fire rate is irrelevant when you can’t guide them. Go for it, dump all 32 missiles, can only guide 2 per illuminator though.
Radar and Electornic Systems are modern 2021 capable so I think HQ 16 will have good guidance from them.
The air search radar is modern sure, the sr2410c is a brand new aesa, however as I have said before, that’s not the issue.