China's multilayered missile defense system

[Psyops]

.we've provided u with the details.u can believe what u want.
ur living in a stone age..russia has an exosperic abm,france has it,u.k has it and india has it way back in 2006..now we're in to second level of defence.wake up

Space Militarization—India in Double Dilemma
ABM-1 Galosh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Good Step for NATO Missile Defense
http://aimt.unob.cz/articles/09_02/09_02 (8).pdf

as i said dont quote me with ur stupid age old facts.tell me when something solid is there.if u have any info related to the topic post it ..

India has demonstrated mid-course missile interception?

Kid, do you even know what we are talking about?

Show us PROOF where you have demonstrated that capability? Go on, we are waiting fanboy.

 

[Fsjal]

Yes, they did.... And its demonstrated. People tend to ignore when comes to ABM, they are a few level of ABM from the most basic of tactical ABM which demonstrated intercepting of Scud-D short range Ballistic missile. They move slower and therefore easier to intercept it.

Patriot , S-300 ,SM-1 are all capable of doing it. Then came the more tricky one of intercepting IRBM which Israel Arrows system , Russian S-400 , Aster 30 and SM-2 or PAC-3 of USA.

Finally with ABM-7 of Russian at exoatmospheric togther with USA SM-3 and finally China HQ-26. But so far only 2 countries has demonstrated real exoatmospheric mid course interception which is USA and China. Both deploy the kinetic kill method while Russia one which has not demonstrated any of it is using proximity fuse of nuclear warhead.

Thanks for the info.

Wait, why use nuclear warhead. Anyway, how is the kinetic warhead guided?

 

[Psyops]

its new`india has seeker technology``lol, they all imported from Russia and Isreal

' And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence'

lol the level of indians naivety, if india did 'have' that techs who is to stop you lot from using it?

and do you know why all your so-called 'indigenous' projects always take too long and too much budget? the reality is you do not have the core techs as always, and have to buy from others, or to ask technological advanced nations to tailor make```

the best humiliating example is the tiny plane called the 'Lost Cause Aircraft'

Pretty much every weapon in India is either an import or components imported and put together to be called 'indigenous'. These guys cannot produce a single component by themselves.

This is the same country that can't even put a man into space claiming to be superior to China. You can make this s**t up.

 

[neehar]

India has demonstrated mid-course missile interception?

Kid, do you even know what we are talking about?

Show us PROOF where you have demonstrated that capability? Go on, we are waiting fanboy.

u should have read the links i posted before posting the crap..guess ur not that lazy..grandpa

 

[Psyops]

u should have read the links i posted before posting the crap..guess ur not that lazy..grandpa

I have read it and absolutely NOTHING in there says anything about India having the capability to do a mid-course missile interception.

I'm waiting kiddo, go on, harder again.

 

[rcrmj]

I have read it and absolutely NOTHING in there says anything about India having the capability to do a mid-course missile interception.

I'm waiting kiddo, go on, harder again.

i wont hold the bet that they will reply accordingly or even read properly

 

[Psyops]

i wont hold the bet that they will reply accordingly or even read properly

It's quite incredible how brainwashed these Indians are by reading some blog of some crackpot Indian general or defence 'expert'. I think they actually believe their own propaganda. That's the sad thing.

 

[Beast]

Thanks for the info.

Wait, why use nuclear warhead. Anyway, how is the kinetic warhead guided?

Not sure, probably Ground tracking with alignment and based on trajectory estimation to send missile on track to meet the ICBM, the final close stage maybe IR homing by the interceptor itself.

It's quite incredible how brainwashed these Indians are by reading some blog of some crackpot Indian general or defence 'expert'. I think they actually believe their own propaganda. That's the sad thing.

They know it. They just act dumb and put on a brave front to deny everything.. That's their strategy! Denial is winning.

 

[Screambowl]

I wouldn't say that except if there is evidence. China is ahead in space and ballistic missile tech.

Anyway, you could give sources, if there is.

no one is apparently denying that china is ahead but India is also not very very behind. The process is slow but firm.

 

[neehar]

I have read it and absolutely NOTHING in there says anything about India having the capability to do a mid-course missile interception.

I'm waiting kiddo, go on, harder again.

looks like u have comprehension problems troll let me help u
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAyRhIH-9cE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6UlFqk7MkA


now dont say u cant see them grandpa..

whoz brainwashed now??

 

[Beast]

looks like u have comprehension problems troll let me help u
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAyRhIH-9cE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6UlFqk7MkA


now dont say u cant see them

Another sad story of Indian self denial.. That's not exoatmospheric mid course interception. That interception is kids play.

 

[GR!FF!N]

A simple search on goggle can easily find out who has demonstrated exoatmospheric mid course interception. As I say, you all are trying too hard to hide your inferiority....

Anti-ballistic missile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Not even Russian has demonstrated of that capabilities... And You Indian dare to brag about it?

not everybody needs to show its strength like the same way..Russia had its own sets of space based weapons since China was a baby(ASAT is an old weapon,not so fancy toy someone want to believe.but most countries oppose this kind of weapon as it creates debris which might harm satellites and space stations)..little bits of knowledge wouldn't hurt...

Naryad anti-satellite system (14F11)

Fractional Orbital Bombardment System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Polyus (spacecraft) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salyut 3 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

also read this....

The origins of the Soviet anti-satellite weapon program are unclear. According to some accounts, Sergei Korolev started some work on the concept in 1956 at his OKB-1, while others attribute the work to Vladimir Chelomei's OKB-52 around 1959. What is certain is that at the beginning of April 1960, Nikita Khrushchev held a meeting at his summer residence in Crimea, discussing an array of defense industry issues. Here, Chelomei outlined his rocket and spacecraft program, and received a go-ahead to start development of the UR-200 rocket, one of its many roles being the launcher for his anti-satellite project. The decision to start work on the weapon was made in March 1961 as the Istrebitel Sputnik (IS) (Interceptor of satellites, or literally "Destroyer of satellites").
The IS system was "co-orbital", approaching its target over time and then exploding a shrapnel warhead close enough to kill it. The missile was launched when a target satellite's ground track rises above the launch site. Once the satellite is detected, the missile is launched into orbit close to the targeted satellite. It takes 90 to 200 minutes (or one to two orbits) for the missile interceptor to get close enough to its target. The missile is guided by an onboard radar. The interceptor, which weighs 1400 kg, may be effective up to one kilometer from a target.
Delays in the UR-200 missile program prompted Chelomei to request R-7 rockets for prototype testing of the IS. Two such tests were carried out on November 1, 1963 and April 12, 1964. Later in the year Khrushchev cancelled the UR-200 in favor of the R-36, forcing the IS to switch to this launcher, whose space launcher version was developed as the Tsyklon 2. Delays in that program led to the introduction of a simpler version, the 2A, which launched its first IS test on October 27, 1967, and a second on April 28, 1968. Further tests carried out against a special target spacecraft, the DS-P1-M, which recorded hits by the IS warhead's shrapnel. A total of 23 launches have been identified as being part of the IS test series. The system was declared operational in February 1973.
Testing resumed in 1976 as a result of the U.S. work on the Space Shuttle. Elements within the Soviet space industry convinced Leonid Brezhnev that the Shuttle was a single-orbit weapon that would be launched from Vandenberg, maneuver to avoid existing anti-ballistic missile sites, bomb Moscow in a first strike, and then land.[4] Although the Soviet military was aware these claims were false[citation needed], Brezhnev believed them and ordered a resumption of IS testing along with a Shuttle of their own. As part of this work the IS system was expanded to allow attacks at higher altitudes and was declared operational in this new arrangement on July 1, 1979. However, in 1983, Yuri Andropov ended all IS testing and all attempts to resume it failed.[5] Ironically, it was at about this point that the U.S. started its own testing in response to the Soviet program.
The Soviet Union also experimented with large, ground-based ASAT lasers from the 1970s onwards (see Terra-3), with a number of U.S. spysats reportedly[citation needed] being 'blinded' (temporarily) during the 1970s and 1980s. The USSR had also researched directed energy weapons, under the Fon project from 1976, but the technical requirements needed of the high-powered gas dynamic lasers and neutral or charged particle beam systems seemed to be beyond reach. The USSR also experimented with military space stations with a capability for anti-satellite duty in its Almaz program.
In the early 1980s, the Soviet Union also started developing a counterpart to the U.S. air-launched ASAT system, using modified MiG-31 'Foxhounds' (at least six of which were completed) as the launch platform

Russia had its own ASAT weapons program..India recently made uproar by announcing that It can convert its ballistic missile as an ASAt weapon if needed(it hurt our image in international arena.then everybody is in denial mode..)

read this.....

In a televised press briefing during the 97th Indian Science Congress in Thiruvananthapuram, the DRDO Director General Rupesh announced that India was developing lasers and an exo-atmospheric kill vehicle that could be combined to produce a weapon to destroy enemy satellites in orbit. Saraswat also claimed that the "kill vehicle, which is needed for intercepting the satellite, needs to be developed, and that work is going on as part of the ballistic missile defense program".[12] Furthermore, on February 10, 2010, DRDO Director-General and Scientific Advisor to the Defence Minister, Dr VK Saraswat stated that India had "all the building blocks necessary" to integrate an anti-satellite weapon to neutralize hostile satellites in low earth and polar orbits. He said that the propulsion module and kill vehicle already existed in principle on the Agni (missile) series of ballistic missiles, but that India did not have a formal anti-satellite weapon project as yet. He indicated, however, that the anti-satellite weapons could be developed as part of the Indian Ballistic Missile Defense Program, which will complete the development stage in totality by 2014.[13] India had identified development of ASAT weapons "for electronic or physical destruction of satellites in both LEO (2,000-km altitude above earth's surface) and the higher GEO-synchronous orbits" as a thrust area in its long-term integrated perspective plan (2012–2027)

also this...

Communication-Centric Intelligence Satellite (CCI-Sat) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another sad story of Indian self denial.. That's not exoatmospheric mid course interception. That is interception is kids play.

how many terminal interception Chinese missile has???which kind of missile??do you have any info on that or just as usual Chinese BS???

 

[Screambowl]

its new`india has seeker technology``lol, they all imported from Russia and Isreal

' And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence'

lol the level of indians naivety, if india did 'have' that techs who is to stop you lot from using it?

and do you know why all your so-called 'indigenous' projects always take too long and too much budget? the reality is you do not have the core techs as always, and have to buy from others, or to ask technological advanced nations to tailor make```

the best humiliating example is the tiny plane called the 'Lost Cause Aircraft'

what is the use of developing core techs when we can buy from others, why to spend billion dollars in research when it is available for millions in TOT. China does the same, because you are under sanctions. You people steal or buy the blue prints from black market and mafia dealing with it and develop your own. Ask your premiers. there is no difference. And that's why world sees you with bulging eyes

 

[Beast]

not everybody needs to show its strength like the same way..Russia had its own sets of space based weapons since China was a baby(ASAT is an old weapon,not so fancy toy someone want to believe.but most countries oppose this kind of weapon as it creates debris which might harm satellites and space stations)..little bits of knowledge wouldn't hurt...

Naryad anti-satellite system (14F11)

Fractional Orbital Bombardment System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Polyus (spacecraft) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salyut 3 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

also read this....






Russia had its own ASAT weapons program..India recently made uproar by announcing that It can convert its ballistic missile as an ASAt weapon if needed(it hurt our image in international arena.then everybody is in denial mode..)

read this.....




also this...

Communication-Centric Intelligence Satellite (CCI-Sat) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



how many terminal interception Chinese missile has???which kind of missile??do you have any info on that or just as usual Chinese BS???

That doesn't matter. Because all our interception and whole trajectory are tracked by US sensor and reported by US intelligence. If we try to do a circus show like what our Indian friend is desperately trying to do. We will become laughing stock but US defence department is not amused. Becos, we demonstrated our capabilites with exact the same kinetic kill method deploy by USN SM-3 with a perfect killed. China has demonstrated to US that we are not that defenceless against their ICBM as they wanted. The US stood up and look up at China....

 

[neehar]

Another sad story of Indian self denial.. That's not exoatmospheric mid course interception. That interception is kids play.

hahahaha dont try to cover ur face now troll..google for other details u want im not here to satisfy ur ego.i've already gave ample info in the previous posts.do u know whats comes in to category of exospheric missile defence??? lets me help u this time read with ur spects intact

"The Indian Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is developing a two-tier Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system that provides a multi-layered shield against ballistic missile attacks.
An advanced version of the BMD system was test fired in 2011. The first phase became operational in 2012 and the second phase will become operational in 2016.
The two-tier system is intended to destroy an incoming missile, at a higher altitude, in the exo-atmosphere and if that miscarries, an endo-atmospheric interception will take place. It can intercept incoming missiles at exo-atmospheric altitudes of 150km and endo-atmospheric altitudes of 80km.
The BMD system consists of a Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) missile and an Advanced Air Defence (AAD) Missile for high and low altitude interception. The PAD intercepts missiles at altitudes between 50km-80km and the AAD missile destroys them at altitudes of 15km-30km." best of luck with that grandpa

DRDO Ballistic Missile Defence System - Army Technology
u dont have a complete info on chinese defence system but bragging abt it..next tym quote me only if u have something solid to say son.my time is too precious to waste it for the sake of u trolls.