What's new

China & Vietnam agree to resolve maritime dispute through negotiations

really? how many navies have advanced stealth destroyers and stealth frigates with advanced fusion sensors. :lol: u sir are a kidder.

and yes. IAF and PAF are better trained pilots than PLAAF. beleive it or not

PLAAF fought the US in jet combat. You fought using propellar planes in WW2. I don't think this is comparable.
 
PLAAF fought the US in jet combat. You fought using propellar planes in WW2. I don't think this is comparable.

The PLAAF thought the US in the 1950's and they did not do well, the Indians though the very formidable and well trained Pakistani air force numerous times.
 
PLAAF fought the US in jet combat. You fought using propellar planes in WW2. I don't think this is comparable.

we also fought the pakistanis who were highly trained by the US and used the latest US jets during 1965 and 1971 wars. although we outnumbered them, they were better in quality. still we won both wars.

IAF and PAF have been engaged in very serious dogfights in the past.

in the present, IAF has exchanged quantity for quality.
 
How'd the Russian air force do against Germany?

we had many aces including one with over 60 kills, as the war went on the Russian air force received better aircraft and better training, initially the Russian air force did not due too well because of outdated aircraft but towards the end of the war they mached the Germans, more importantly it was a small group of Russian pilots that contributed to over half of all Sabre kills in Korea, in all Russian pilots in Korea downed hundreds of allied fighters/bombers.
 
we had many aces including one with over 60 kills, as the war went on the Russian air force received better aircraft and better training, initially the Russian air force did not due too well because of outdated aircraft but towards the end of the war they mached the Germans, more importantly it was a small group of Russian pilots that contributed to over half of all Sabre kills in Korea, in all Russian pilots in Korea downed hundreds of allied fighters/bombers.

maybe its because China had no planes other than the ones donated by USSR? Anyhow heres a list of Chinese Air to air victories in Korea:

Chinese Air-to-Air Victories during the Korean War, 1950-1953

Compared to Indian air to air victories in all history:

Indian Air-to-Air Victories since 1948

As you see, the list is quite a bit shorter on that side.
 
maybe its because China had no planes other than the ones donated by USSR? Anyhow heres a list of Chinese Air to air victories in Korea:

Chinese Air-to-Air Victories during the Korean War, 1950-1953

Compared to Indian air to air victories in all history:

Indian Air-to-Air Victories since 1948

As you see, the list is quite a bit shorter on that side.

China had hundreds of aircraft in the Korean war, Russia, on the other hand, had a mere handful but was responsible for a majority of all NATO aircraft losses.
 
we had many aces including one with over 60 kills, as the war went on the Russian air force received better aircraft and better training, initially the Russian air force did not due too well because of outdated aircraft but towards the end of the war they mached the Germans, more importantly it was a small group of Russian pilots that contributed to over half of all Sabre kills in Korea, in all Russian pilots in Korea downed hundreds of allied fighters/bombers.

Lol,since when you Russians begin to troll like the Indians and Vietnamnese here?Should I say that the PLAAF didnt even exist before it stepped into the Korea war while most of the US pilots had thousnads of hours trainning and combat experients in ww2?
 
China had hundreds of aircraft in the Korean war, Russia, on the other hand, had a mere handful but was responsible for a majority of all NATO aircraft losses.

You mean in 1953? It was true,but in 1950s and 1951s ,no.The PLAAF had no respect airforce cover until very late stage of the Korea war,othewise the UN troops were already kicked out of Korea.
 
so how did a thread about peaceful negotiations become loaded with who has the better fighter pilots e-peen size comparisons?
 
PLA is better than IA no doubt.

but when it comes to the navy, its a completely different story. Indian navy is probably the best in asia. why? massive experiance and hardware.

Indian navy has sunk countless warships and submarines in the past and of course the pirates declared war on indian navy.

china has never opereated an aircraft carrier while india has been doing so since the 50's

You don't need an aircraft carrier to win a naval war. Especially when it can be sunk by submarines, which China have plenty of.

Indian army is rapdily modernising, but in no time are they ready for a naval war, let alone sustain and win it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't need an aircraft carrier to win a naval war. Especially when it can be sunk by submarines, which China have plenty of.

Indian army is rapdily modernising, but in no time are they ready for a naval war, let alone sustain and win it.



A/C helps a lot. they are accompanied by a battle group that is sub specific. IN have sunk subs b4 so we have exp.

Indian army is modernising but is not a match for PLA, which i believe is the best in the world. IAF and IN are another matter however.

PS: about the video, indian media companies sensationalize everything. u should know that by now
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom