My apology for my impoliteness.
Here is the duplicity India has been playing. On the one hand, India acknowledges China's sovereignty over Tibet; on the other hand India hosts the Tibetan exiled government on your soil. Your government's permitting Tibetan exiled government to stay in your country is an action of supporting their separating plan.
Permitting the Tibetans on Indian soil to engage in any armed activity overtly or covertly against Chinese administration is an action of war, should i feel grateful that India is not doing that?
I am not gonna to argue with you on if Chinese territorial integrity has been affected or not, it is irrelevant. The point here is that India is harbouring a bunch of people who are trying to separate Tibet from China. They have not succeeded yet, but that doesn't mean India's accommodation of them is justifiable. What India and Dalai Lama are doing is what we call inchoate crimes, people still get punished for that.
It is not just Dalai Lama, my Indian fellow. India is harbouring an exiled Tibetan goverment, whose main mission is to split Tibet from China. By hosting them, India is contradicting its official stance over Tibet.
The bottomline is you should never support those secessionists, and Inida has crossed that line for over 50 years.
BTW, don't throw that democracy crap at us, even if you are a democracy, you are not allowed to interfer with other's internal affairs.
Your explanations to my questions are not convincing at all, your selective blindness on the fact that Dalai Lama and his followers are secessionists and India is essentially interfering with China's internal affairs by hosting them only proves your dishonesty.
But i am gonna to address your concern for the sake of this discussion.
With regard to Kashmir, you should understand China's stance over that issue. China does not recognize Kashmir as an integral part of India and China views it as a disputed land between India and Pakistan, so before you two sort it out, China is gonna stick to that stance.
Therefore, from China's perspective, Kashmir is not India's internal business. Denying a visa to that admiral consists with our official stance. If one day China changed its stance, say China officially recognized India's sovereingty over Kashmir, you can accuse China of interfering with your internal business. Before that, China is entitled to issue a stapled visa policy to that region.
If you want to justify what India is doing to Tibet, a simple way is to force your government to reverse its stance over Tibet. I think i have made my point clear enough.
