What's new

China looks to re-balance ties with India & Pakistan

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
China looks to re-balance ties with India & Pakistan

China will look to strike a better balance in its relations with India and Pakistan and will focus on improving relations with its neighbours in the next Five-Year Plan period (2011-15), according to representatives of the country’s top foreign policy advisory body.

China would place a priority on ensuring a stable neighbourhood environment and was in favour of an early settlement of the long-running border dispute with India, members of the country’s Foreign Policy Advisory Group (FPAG), which provides inputs for the Chinese government’s diplomacy, told reporters on Friday in a briefing on the country’s priorities for the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period.

“China indeed has a closer cooperation with Pakistan than India. However, after the improvement in the bilateral relationship between China and India, we sincerely hope that we can take relations forward to have a better relationship,” said Qu Xing, an FPAG member who is also president of the China Institute of International Studies.

“The best solution,” he said, “is that we should try to have such kind of cooperation with India equal to that of China and Pakistan”, indicating that China should try to restore “a balance” it struck in relations with both countries in the 1950s.

The FPAG’s comments come as China looks to re-evaluate its relationship with Pakistan against the backdrop of a changing regional environment.

With the United States announcing plans for a withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and amid recent strains between Washington and Islamabad, some analysts in China have called for a strengthening of ties between “all-weather” allies China and Pakistan.

But China has, so far, been cautious in taking forward ties with an eye on improving relations with the U.S. and India, recently rejecting suggestions from Pakistani officials that it was considering setting up a naval base in the country.

“While pursuing the further development of friendship with Pakistan, we are also working actively to promote friendship between China and India,” added Ma Zhenggang, a former Ambassador to the United Kingdom and member of the FPAG, which also includes former Ambassador to India Zhou Gang.

“To be frank,” Mr. Ma said, “Chinese people do not wish to see suspicions from India or Pakistan concerning China’s relationship with either country.”

He expressed confidence that the long-running boundary dispute, over which 14 rounds of talks have only achieved slow progress, could be resolved peacefully. “China has settled land border disputes with all neighbours except India,” he said. “Its settlement calls for attention from both sides…As two major countries in Asia, long standing issues are negative to our bilateral cooperation.”

He said the two countries needed to create an “enabling environment” for the settlement of the issue, suggesting that its resolution “did not concern technical problems” and was more tied up in “the emotional sentiment of the people.”

Mr. Qu said China wanted better relations between India and Pakistan because it “does not wish to see tension to the west of our country.”

The Hindu : News / International : China looks to rebalance ties with India, Pakistan
 
.
This won't work unless Pakistan and India are committed to ending their disputes. Hopefully joining the SCO will herald the start of normalization between the two countries.
 
. .
Please all Asians need to work together for the betterment of European Style relations. West's intentions is to divide all of Asia just like Europe wars (WWI, WWII). Not only India/Pakistan, West's interference in the East Europe, Russia, China and Central Asians.

Hope we don't follow same fates.
 
.
Nevertheless, it would not mean that China would give up its claims on parts of South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh). Chinese nationalists will see this as Beijing's weakness otherwise.
 
. .
Nevertheless, it would not mean that China would give up its claims on parts of South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh). Chinese nationalists will see this as Beijing's weakness otherwise.

China should vigorously claim South Tibet, it was literally stolen from China. Since america did not dare do anything when China retook Tibet, America won't dare do anything now if China retakes South Tibet.
 
.
China should vigorously claim South Tibet, it was literally stolen from China. Since america did not dare do anything when China retook Tibet, America won't dare do anything now if China retakes South Tibet.

What is stopping China from doeing this.
 
.
China should vigorously claim South Tibet, it was literally stolen from China. Since america did not dare do anything when China retook Tibet, America won't dare do anything now if China retakes South Tibet.

Good idea. But they have nukes.
 
.
China should vigorously claim South Tibet, it was literally stolen from China. Since america did not dare do anything when China retook Tibet, America won't dare do anything now if China retakes South Tibet.

Great advice:lol: What the Indians will be doing then? Do you expect that they will offer the land on a platter:disagree: It is not possible for America to armtwist china and the same applies for China with respect to India smilarly Indian planned attack on Pak also:no: any of the above would be sucidal:hang2:
 
.
China should vigorously claim South Tibet, it was literally stolen from China. Since america did not dare do anything when China retook Tibet, America won't dare do anything now if China retakes South Tibet.
You do know that arunachal is part of India ?(we are talking about india here not some failed state like bangladesh) and its not a cake walk for chines to just come and take arunachal they will have to fight for and we are ready to fight till end !
 
.
Great advice:lol: What the Indians will be doing then? Do you expect that they will offer the land on a platter:disagree: It is not possible for America to armtwist china and the same applies for China with respect to India smilarly Indian planned attack on Pak also:no: any of the above would be sucidal:hang2:

So, you see, just having the nukes makes all the difference and that's why uncle sam advises others not to acquire the nukes because that removes the opportunity to armtwist a nation into accepting the american hegemony.
 
.
So, you see, just having the nukes makes all the difference and that's why uncle sam advises others not to acquire the nukes because that removes the opportunity to armtwist a nation into accepting the american hegemony.

India did not had nukes in 1971 and US even sent their 7th fleet to save their ally Pakistan, but it did not stop India. What you need is a strong will power to face up to their opponents.
 
.
we are talking about india here not some failed state like bangladesh

Why you said that? Bangladesh is growing steadily too. India's GDP per capita is higher than China's in 1990, but now is only 1/4 of China's. Can we say India is a failed state?
 
.
Why you said that? Bangladesh is growing steadily too. India's GDP per capita is higher than China's in 1990, but now is only 1/4 of China's. Can we say India is a failed state?


this is not my personal opinion you can refer to official list of failed states !
 
.
Back
Top Bottom