What's new

China demands territorial concessions to bring it closer to India's sensiti

Status
Not open for further replies.
are you high on something,I don't belive my ancestors the same as British,we live on this land for thousands of years,British colonists had nothing to do with India before.

you are definately high if you think Indian ancestors were British... did you read this history in CCP classes? :rofl:

the Mongols and Manchus are not Chinese. You have occupied those lands now. But doesn't change the fact that the Mongols and Manchus had nothing to do with Chinese. And your ancestors may be Manchus or Mongols.

Can you deny Manchus and Mongols INVADED China?

how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?
that is the thing India is not divided on ethnic lines. Unlike China where Hans are the only real Chinese.
 
you are definately high if you think Indian ancestors were British... did you read this history in CCP classes? :rofl:

the Mongols and Manchus are not Chinese. You have occupied those lands now. But doesn't change the fact that the Mongols and Manchus had nothing to do with Chinese. And your ancestors may be Manchus or Mongols.

Can you deny Manchus and Mongols INVADED China?

anyone can write on wikipedia,I can even write on that ,therotically it's a wrong statement.they invaded a southern dynasty,not whole China and how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

from Chinese perspective,all those small kindoms part of China

2010294283669442354.jpg
 
anyone can write on wikipedia,I can even write on that ,therotically it's a wrong statement.they invaded a southern dynasty,not whole China and how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

Wikipedia... its everywhere... no Chinese History book is complete without mentioning the Invasion of China by Mongols and manchus.. :rofl:

so remember Mongols/Manchus INVADED China and Chinese. They were not Chinese. They exploited the Chinese. Bitter but true.

from Chinese perspective,all those small kindoms part of China

Obviously you will consider those lands as Chinese, as now you have invaded their lands and migrated in millions to make those lands Han majority!!

it is very apparent that only Hans are Chinese:

1) Great Wall was built to protect China so China ends at the great wall.
2) Mongols and Manchus were not Chinese, but infact INVADERS of China
3) The Tibetans and Uighars are even far off lands so no remote connection to China
4) The modern China is just a recent phenomenon which is nothing but occupation of others lands by Hans and continued exploitation of other races by Hans. The local Races have become insignificant and falied to be a force in all lands invaded by Hans. Isnt it true? whereas the Hans have overtaken all the major activities of those lands.
 
anyone can write on wikipedia,I can even write on that ,therotically it's a wrong statement.they invaded a southern dynasty,not whole China and how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

from Chinese perspective,all those small kindoms part of China

2010294283669442354.jpg

Mongols and Manchus never used Chinese pictorial script. Native Mongol writing system is completely different.
 
it seems that this conversation hits a dead end,we are native people and we are not like British to India,Indians just can't wrap their head around this simple fact,and just answer me one quesiton,how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?
 
it seems that this conversation hits a dead end,we are native people and we are not like British to India,Indians just can't wrap their head around this simple fact,and just answer me one quesiton,how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

People with Indian citizenship. Is it different in China ?
 
India is a third party in this dispute,if it joins in openly China will openly enter Kashmir to defend Pakistan.

Hey bully, China is already in kashmir, and chinese leaders are greatly happy for the fact, that we havent helped vietnam with weapons yet. They wont do anything that will change balance,. And it will push us to join Japan. Chinese leaders are not so dumb like u
 
India is a third party in this dispute,if it joins in openly China will openly enter Kashmir to defend Pakistan.

China can openly enter Kashmir, will not make an iota of difference. They will get killed too if a war starts.

But this will lead to India supporting and forming alliances in East Asia. And giving ballistic missiles to Vietnam would be a great start.
 
China can openly enter Kashmir, will not make an iota of difference. They will get killed too if a war starts.

But this will lead to India supporting and forming alliances in East Asia. And giving ballistic missiles to Vietnam would be a great start.

If India start to give away ballistic missiles, than India will just invite sanctions from the west.
 
Wikipedia... its everywhere... no Chinese History book is complete without mentioning the Invasion of China by Mongols and manchus.. :rofl:

so remember Mongols/Manchus INVADED China and Chinese. They were not Chinese. They exploited the Chinese. Bitter but true.



Obviously you will consider those lands as Chinese, as now you have invaded their lands and migrated in millions to make those lands Han majority!!

it is very apparent that only Hans are Chinese:

1) Great Wall was built to protect China so China ends at the great wall.
2) Mongols and Manchus were not Chinese, but infact INVADERS of China
3) The Tibetans and Uighars are even far off lands so no remote connection to China
4) The modern China is just a recent phenomenon which is nothing but occupation of others lands by Hans and continued exploitation of other races by Hans. The local Races have become insignificant and falied to be a force in all lands invaded by Hans. Isnt it true? whereas the Hans have overtaken all the major activities of those lands.

Here is the real Chinese border(Great Wall of China) protecting real land of Hans.

qin-dynasty-great-wall-map.gif
 
how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

India is a state not based on ethnicity.

Chinese themselves are not one ethincity, they are a mixture of lot of ethincites.

If India start to give away ballistic missiles, than India will just invite sanctions from the west.

There is a MTCR agreement which permits 500 km range, that range is enough for Philippines or Vietnam.
 
If India start to give away ballistic missiles, than India will just invite sanctions from the west.

There are many ways around sanctions. If it comes to China harming or threatening our territorial integrity, there are many ways for us to do the exact same.
 
how many ethnic groups do India have by the way and which one is the only one be regarded as "real Indians"?

The concept of Hanization itself is wrong, how can a minority become Hannized if they marry a han??
Not the reverse.

On that note Chinese are not hans but a mixed breed.
 
If India start to give away ballistic missiles, than India will just invite sanctions from the west.

When we tested Agni-5 no country protested except for India bashing articles in CCP's mouthpiece globaltimes. ;)
 
Here is the real Chinese border(Great Wall of China) protecting real land of Hans.

qin-dynasty-great-wall-map.gif

Qin? ???? The first empire that was in 221B.C.? Where is India in 221 B.C.

Why don't you post the maps from Han Dynasty, Tang Dynasty, Ming Dynasty?

Shall we redivide the world by the maps from B.C.? Well, then most of countries didn't even exist, maybe some of you Indians can help.

Some of the Indians in this thread are pathetic and some of them even laughed at China for being invaded by Mongols and Japan? The Mongols invaded India too and half of Europe. In fact, China is the last that fell to Mongol, for 60 years. How is this a matter that can be funny to some of the Indian members? Japanese invasion? That's WWII when most of humanity descended into hell and Indians are making fun of brutality of imperialism?

Pathetic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom