What's new

Çay Bahçesi

Sinan said:
From our point of view Byzantines are bad, Turks are good.

But you right. :)
Click to expand...

Historically, Byzantines didn't done much to us, they were barely defending themselves from us :D those guys in the series are nt Byzantines anyway.
 
Turkish_FR said:
No, we were not the bad guys, they were just trying to control whole ME and Anatolia, under the command of Constantin and we did what we had to do.
Click to expand...

Didn't we came anatolia from central asia? So They were protect themselves... Am I wrong?
In Turkish 'Dağdan gelip bağdakini kovmak...'

Edit: Crusaders destroyed even istanbul.- So they were worst. But we wasn't angels at all...
 
TheWolf said:
Didn't we came anatolia from central asia? So They were protect themselves... Am I wrong?
In Turkish 'Dağdan gelip bağdakini kovmak...'
Click to expand...
In international arena. You take land. Or your land will be taken. Either you expand or shrink as a state. It is never static. Also Anatolia was not native Roman land. They took it from the Greeks and the Greeks took it from the Trojans, Hittites, Lydians, etc.
 
Horus said:
Its not... but some Turkish words just confuse me.. :(
Click to expand...

vocab is easy to build up, we share over 5,000 words in common...learning their grammar structure would be the larger challenge, takes time
 
atatwolf said:
In international arena. You take land. Or your land will be taken. Either you expand or shrink as a state. It is never static. Also Anatolia was not native Roman land. They took it from the Greeks and the Greeks took it from the Trojans, Hittites, Lydians, etc.
Click to expand...

Actually Thats right too, Because of that I said ''I havent any problem about that''
Anyway, It was 800 years ago... So Talking about that is pointless... :)
 
TheWolf said:
Didn't we came anatolia from central asia? So They were protect themselves... Am I wrong?
In Turkish 'Dağdan gelip bağdakini kovmak...'

Edit: Crusaders destroyed even istanbul.- So they were worst. But we wasn't angels at all...
Click to expand...

You are right when we look at the events from afar. The point which you miss is to think about the past under the effect of current conditions. So the former states were not like as it is today. Anatolia was not a piece of land full of The Byzantines or other Greek principalities, borders were not established with a certainty. To claim that a piece of land belongs to you was doing it belong to you. Also the Turkish existence in Anatolia extends until BC 2000. We are only taught about 1071 Malazgirt.
 
atatwolf said:
In international arena. You take land. Or your land will be taken. Either you expand or shrink as a state. It is never static. Also Anatolia was not native Roman land. They took it from the Greeks and the Greeks took it from the Trojans, Hittites, Lydians, etc.
Click to expand...
I think the Anatolians moved to the caucasus or absorbed by the Greeks.
 

Similar threads

ghazi52
South Asia floods leave nearly 300,000 Bangladeshis in emergency shelters
Replies
1
Views
965
ghazi52
ghazi52
Viet
Vietnam speeds land reclamation in South China Sea
Replies
7
Views
987
Song Hong
Song Hong
M
An explanation about the context of the Quranic text
Replies
4
Views
713
Mughal1
M
艹艹艹
'Our entire team changed.' Indian techie narrates how they are being replaced with Vietnam developers
Replies
2
Views
480
fitpOsitive
fitpOsitive
Skimming
No Indians but only Pakistanis celebrate Congress win, claims BJP's C T Ravi
Replies
12
Views
2K
Trailer23
Trailer23

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom