Indian_Patriot
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Hope all this SAM research/development leads one day to an effective ABM system or am i getting my hopes up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TELs of Brahmos and Prahar/Pragati $ucks ....... Compared to that TEL of Nirbhay $ucks more ....
We have the same problems in other areas too:
TATA 8x8 with Denel howitzer
View attachment 183597
Original Denel howitzer on a 6x6 truck
View attachment 183598
TATA 8x8 with Rheinmetalls Skyshield air defence gun
View attachment 183599
While even Indonesia had smarter solutions
View attachment 183600
Indian TELs
Brahmos
Prahar/Pragati
Nirbhay
TELs of Brahmos and Prahar/Pragati $ucks ....... Compared to that TEL of Nirbhay $ucks more ....
See the chinese and heck even the Pak TELs are better
Which company makes Pakistan TEL?
exactly ..................indian missile launcher is too bulky............we need to learn from russia or chinaIndian TELs
Brahmos
Prahar/Pragati
Nirbhay
TELs of Brahmos and Prahar/Pragati $ucks ....... Compared to that TEL of Nirbhay $ucks more ....
See the chinese and heck even the Pak TELs are better
We have the same problems in other areas too:
TATA 8x8 with Denel howitzer
View attachment 183597
Original Denel howitzer on a 6x6 truck
View attachment 183598
both are 8x8
exactly ..................indian missile launcher is too bulky............we need to learn from russia or china
just look at the launcher........all are trailer not mobile enough
look at chinese ones...............compact small and contains more missiles
look at the launch of LY-80E sam 6X6 contains six missiles where pragati is 12X12 have same no sof missile
pakistanis ones are imported from chinese.............
both are 8x8
View attachment 183597
View attachment 183598
all are chinese..................which are again from russia......Even the case of BM TELs are no different .
This comparison says it all ,
The TEL of the Brahmos/Prahar is fine IMHO- the 12X12 Tatra is very capable in terms of its mobility and off roading capability. The Brahmos is a huge missile and if you want to transport 3 of them and launch form a vehicle you are going to need a huge vehicle.TELs of Brahmos and Prahar/Pragati $ucks ....... Compared to that TEL of Nirbhay $ucks more ....
We have the same problems in other areas too:
TATA 8x8 with Denel howitzer
View attachment 183597
Original Denel howitzer on a 6x6 truck
View attachment 183598
TATA 8x8 with Rheinmetalls Skyshield air defence gun
View attachment 183599
While even Indonesia had smarter solutions
View attachment 183600
exactly ..................indian missile launcher is too bulky............we need to learn from russia or china
just look at the launcher........all are trailer not mobile enough
look at chinese ones...............compact small and contains more missiles
look at the launch of LY-80E sam 6X6 contains six missiles where pragati is 12X12 have same no sof missile
pakistanis ones are imported from chinese.............
both are 8x8
View attachment 183597
View attachment 183598
True, but denel has also a 6x6 on an armored vehicle that was even tested in India in trials and the other competitors of the the TATA / DENEL howitzer now, are based on 6x6 trucks too, Ashok Leyland for example, just as the Israeli Atmos, that might come with a foreign truck though.
The point is, no matter how good the howitzer or missile is, a large and heavy platform will limit it's operational use and mobility. The TATA howitzer, or an oversized Barak 8 trailer will be hard to transport other by transport aircrafts for example and we need these SAM systems and howitzers in the mountain areas too, which makes mobility crucial.
Even the case of BM TELs are no different .
This comparison says it all ,