Takes one to know one is it?
nope, since your making it obvious!
Read the history of the subcontinent genius....
i already know the history very well, i don't need an ignorant to teach me!!
If Islam's onset in the Subcontinent was merely 1000 years ago, and the history of the Indian subcontinent spands over 5000 years
and whats is that supposed to prove???
...then the 4000 years of this history, the people who lived in present day Pakistan were of either Hindu or Buddhist religions....Now please get the plot already...
Hint: Very good chance your forefathers were Hindu....
no doubt they were buddhists and hindus, i'm not denying! Even arabs of Arabia were idol worshippers (though they weren't called "hindus")! But you said in your post
#66 that Pakistanis ancestors were dalits and dravidians lol, give me a break! you have no facts to support your silly claims!
Since Islam was spread through Sufism and the people most affected by the message of these Sufis (at least the ones converting) were Dalits, a lot of the present day Muslims in the Subcontinent could very well have been Dalits....
wrong!!!!
northern indian subcontinent (present day Pakistan) was subjected to many invasions by Aryans, Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Turks, Mongols, Afghans, etc.
Mahmood Ghaznavi wasn't a sufi, neither was Muhammad Bin Qasim, Muhammad Ghori, Taimur Shah, Babur, Sher Shah Suri, Nadir Shah or Ahmed Shah Durrani!
These invaders began to destroy hindu idols as soon as they set foot on the subcontinent.
However Islam spread in south india as result of sufism.
I'm a ethnic Pashtun, my ancestors are Afghans, not some dalits or dravidians lol!
so get your facts straight genius!!
Of course its hard to say what % of converts were Dalits, but that does not take away the possibility that modern day Pakistanis can trace their origins to such...
the only Pakistanis who can trace their origins to dravidians, dalits, south indians are the muhajirs who migrated to Pakistan during partition.
a. You cant prove I didnt click on those links...so calling my argument irrelevant based on an assumption of the same is quite laughable.
its obvious you didn't check those links because your stating so much nonsense!
b. Clicking on the link does not mean that the matter of disussion has been solved and that it has been proven that Pakistan was always an independent entity...
firstly yes it does mean that the matter of discussion has been solved because you stated that Pakistanis and indians are the same culturally and ethnically based on your own personal opinion and i refuted your statement and backed up my argument with sources based on facts!
I dont think you even have any substance to debunk my claim that modern day Pakistan is a political entity that took birth in 1947 only....
just like modern day india is a political entity that took birth in 15 august 1947
(Pakistan is a day older)
I conclude it is useless to argue with you any futher.....
says the person who can't even back his argument with facts
was a legendary Indo-Aryan emperor of India, referred in Hindu and Jain mythology. Bharata's empire covered all of the Indian subcontinent, Bactria, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgistan, Turkmenistan, and Persia. And we are 'bharatiya' as you like to call us.
And it has got to be returned sometime in future.
