I did not say "your legs" so relax. And be on your way. I already said I stood by you but that does not mean I would accept
my family members to behave like you. I have right to my
personal views but they only are applicable to those near and dear to me. So move on okay. This is getting
tedious. For the last time. You can wear what you like. However that does not mean I have to
accept that in my family okay? My views only apply on those close to me. You can slap on a miniskirt and twerk yourself in public. Now do please excuse me.
I am having problems explaining the concept of secularist but being socially conservative. Conservatism is informed by weight of tradition howsoever informed and accepts
change at a philosophical level but is
not informed by ruled by dogma or strict religious scripture. It accepts change at a slow generational level. For instance I have no illusions that few generations or maybe even earlier my line might be acting or wearing what
@Divergent does that does not mean I accept that now. It's acceptance of gradual change.
Of course I am against scripture being used as prescription and state being used to engorce dogmsa or ritual contours of religion. I get abused by the religious zealots regularly as "westoxified" as you perhaps know. I don't think they thought I would be arch-cultural conservative.