Bangladesh summons Pakistani envoy over video showing 'distorted historical facts'

[Sully3]

well done embassy of pakistan, bengalis can believe the lies they want but facts will remain. Like the fact the sheikh hessina is a stooge of Modi getting cheap rupees from New Delhi.

 

[countryman]

Though I was out of thread but really didn't wanted to talk on this topic anymore but just couldn't ignore the long text you drafted.

"No, I disagree ... Pakistani leaders were incorrect": I never said founders of Pakistan were incorrect - I just said Bangladesh should not have been the part of Pakistan. Founders of Pakistan had no choice but to leave these scumbags alone into India or include them with themselves but the later was only route that could have lead to their independence. Britain only given them two choices either join India or join Pakistan and ignored their bengal idea. Also, founders of Pakistan couldn't ignore them or endorse to their wishes because two nations theory was only cause of Indo-Pak split and would have risked the creation of Pakistan itself. But they were well aware of their priorities and tendencies of most of these people.

"Insightful strategies": I've an idea of what insightful strategies you're talking about. Pakistan could have the same pleasure that India enjoy by immediately giving the independence to east Pakistan and using them to cut off the rest of bengal from India. However, past is past, but personally I've no grudge against India or agenda except Kashmir.

"Lack of unity among Muslims": Agreed

"Following leaders": I don't believe in following anyone blindly. Leaders only become leaders when you accept 'em to be your leader, leadership isn't enforced but people except it despite their differences.

"Unity among the Muslims and Hindus": O o, we're not talking about that - those who believed this stayed in India or are in Bangladesh but we're not those people.

"Now we have traitors in government too, stealing and creating policies that hinder what Pakistan was designed for. In a nutshell that country is made up of traitors." Did I just misunderstood or you're really calling us all the traitors? Though, I agree there are good and bad people in every society.

"This country if only they were loyal...They aligned with Hindus, just like many traitors among Muslims across the world are doing": They made their choice and maybe they'll see the aftereffects one day if they're not already seeing. Only thing that I regret is that they defied the very basic cause of existence of Pakistan - they beat the hatred drums today and their population just by anything they sell. Anyway, sorry, I'm really frustrated of talking about Bangladesh.

 

[django]

I love my Bangladeshi brothers but I don't like this Gremlin Hasina...

 

[idune]

This is indian puppet regime of awami league and sheikh mujib cult barking. Ordinary people do not care about sheikh mujib and he has nothing to do at present and in future of Bangladesh. Please, ignore awami barking.

 

[Hassan Guy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/905302327380336640

 

[Rollno21]

Pakistan did not separate from India. Pakistan was created as an independent country after the British left the sub continent.

Yeah we know before it was part of India

 

[El Sidd]

Though I was out of thread but really didn't wanted to talk on this topic anymore but just couldn't ignore the long text you drafted.

"No, I disagree ... Pakistani leaders were incorrect": I never said founders of Pakistan were incorrect - I just said Bangladesh should not have been the part of Pakistan. Founders of Pakistan had no choice but to leave these scumbags alone into India or include them with themselves but the later was only route that could have lead to their independence. Britain only given them two choices either join India or join Pakistan and ignored their bengal idea. Also, founders of Pakistan couldn't ignore them or endorse to their wishes because two nations theory was only cause of Indo-Pak split and would have risked the creation of Pakistan itself. But they were well aware of their priorities and tendencies of most of these people.

"Insightful strategies": I've an idea of what insightful strategies you're talking about. Pakistan could have the same pleasure that India enjoy by immediately giving the independence to east Pakistan and using them to cut off the rest of bengal from India. However, past is past, but personally I've no grudge against India or agenda except Kashmir.

"Lack of unity among Muslims": Agreed

"Following leaders": I don't believe in following anyone blindly. Leaders only become leaders when you accept 'em to be your leader, leadership isn't enforced but people except it despite their differences.

"Unity among the Muslims and Hindus": O o, we're not talking about that - those who believed this stayed in India or are in Bangladesh but we're not those people.

"Now we have traitors in government too, stealing and creating policies that hinder what Pakistan was designed for. In a nutshell that country is made up of traitors." Did I just misunderstood or you're really calling us all the traitors? Though, I agree there are good and bad people in every society.

"This country if only they were loyal...They aligned with Hindus, just like many traitors among Muslims across the world are doing": They made their choice and maybe they'll see the aftereffects one day if they're not already seeing. Only thing that I regret is that they defied the very basic cause of existence of Pakistan - they beat the hatred drums today and their population just by anything they sell. Anyway, sorry, I'm really frustrated of talking about Bangladesh.

It is what it is

Yeah we know before it was part of India

India is a British name given to the occupied territories of the sub continent.

People have been calling this place with all sorts of name.

India
Bharat
Hindustan

India is a foreign name to the region.

 

[Rollno21]

India is a British name given to the occupied territories of the sub continent.

People have been calling this place with all sorts of name.

India
Bharat
Hindustan

India is a foreign name to the region.

Ok let it make it simple for you,forget the name,do you agree the present day Pakistan and India where one nation before British left

 

[El Sidd]

Ok let it make it simple for you,forget the name,do you agree the present day Pakistan and India where one nation before British left

No.

 

[war&peace]

and I don't like her supporters too

 

[Mutakalim]

you can continue CHUMMAing the UMMAH in your personal capacity and not let it infect others.

Whats the reason behind your hatred of Ummah?

 

[El Sidd]

Whats the reason behind your hatred of Ummah?

Because it is a myth and I prefer reality.

 

[django]

Because it is a myth

It is something that is spiritual.

I prefer reality.

Islam acknowledges that we have to give property to our own families first, when it comes to nation states one can certainly interpret that as your OWN nation.Kudos

 

[El Sidd]

It is something that is spiritual.

Explain it to me. I am all ears????

It is something that is spiritual.


Islam acknowledges that we have to give property to our own families first, when it comes to nation states one can certainly interpret that as your OWN nation.Kudos

That's confusing.

Islam has no concept of nation states.

 

[war&peace]

It is something that is spiritual.


Islam acknowledges that we have to give property to our own families first, when it comes to nation states one can certainly interpret that as your OWN nation.Kudos

Sir in principle, Islam does not support nation-states but loving your "watan" is totally okay and natural. So I love Pakistan and I'm patriotic (I think people on PDF know it) but I'm not a nationalist. I won't declare my nationality being superior to any other and still I'm proud of being Pakistani.