What's new

Attacks against Iranian history, culture, nations by foreigners and insiders

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not character assassination, his past is knows which disqualifies him from talking about certain topics.
Pourpirar was born in 1940 or 1941 in Tehran, Iran. Pourpirar was closely involved with the Tudeh Party of Iran, a major Iranian political party with Communist or left tendencies. After the 1979 Revolution, he joined the revolutionaries.

Now read, lord of the rings is closer to historical facts than what this mental ill person wrote in his whole life: :lol:

He considered Behistun Inscription as a symbol of this genocide. He claimed that construction of Persepolis was never finished and that the Achaemenid dynasty was a group of ancient barbarian Slavic invaders that ended with Darius the Great after they returned to their homeland in the Eurasian steppes. The rest of the Achaemenid, Parthian, Sassanid, Tahirid, Ghaznavid, Seljuqid and Samanid dynasties according to Pourpirar were fabricated by historians of mostly Jewish background as part of a Jewish conspiracy.

He claimed that all inscriptions said to be Sassanid are modern forgeries. He claimed that historical personalities such as Mazdak, Mani, Zoroaster, Babak, Abu Moslem, and Salman the Persian were invented by modern Jewish historians.

:lol::lol::lol:
You still avoided to answer what he said in that documentary.
simply because that's the solid undeniable truth.
 
You still avoided to answer what he said in that documentary.
simply because that's the solid undeniable truth.

It is only 'truth' you because you shares his anti-nationalist outlook.
 
I don't agree with this thread though. It serves no purpose. Iran has had its fair share of traitors in its history, like most states, and while it has faced near catastrophic invasions, it always managed to preserve its identity and distinct culture. In the end, conquerors were always conquered by it.
Bro that's your opinion, I respect you as a fellow Iranian who has always protected Iranian identity. However we should not hide the attackers of Iran and Iranians. We should name and shame them so that all of us are aware of these elements/insects who're chewing on the pillars of Iran to weaken our confidence, self-esteem and self-belief. We'll publish books, make websites about them so that our youth knows the difference between friends and enemies.
 
Bro that's your opinion, I respect you as a fellow Iranian who has always protected Iranian identity. However we should not hide the attackers of Iran and Iranians. We should name and shame them so that all of us are aware of these elements/insects who're chewing on the pillars of Iran to weaken our confidence, self-esteem and self-belief. We'll publish books, make websites about them so that our youth knows the difference between friends and enemies.

I respectfully disagree.

You give legitimacy to their idiotic stances by giving them attention. We should ignore them, as they will always be minority in Iran and will fail with their agendas. Look at the current situation in Iran: IRI has made people more nationalistic than ever.
 
You still avoided to answer what he said in that documentary.
simply because that's the solid undeniable truth.
He said that salman al-farsi was invented by jews. Such persons no ones takes serious except some illiterate (bisavad) figures. I don't take conspiracy theorists serious. @Surenas also answered you why you islamists and panturkists follow such revisionists and attackers of Iranian identity.
 
Last edited:
Sadeq Khalkhali, insults towards Cyrus the great, plans to demolish historical site of Persepolis.

220px-Sadegh_Khalkhali_Portrait.jpg


Khalkhali was known for his antipathy towards pre-Islamic Iran. In 1979 he wrote a book "branding king Cyrus the Great a tyrant, a liar, and a homosexual" and "called for the destruction of the Tomb of Cyrus and remains of the two-thousand-year-old Persian palace in Shiraz, Fars Province, the Persepolis." According to an interview by Elaine Sciolino of Shiraz-based Ayatollah Majdeddin Mahallati, Khalkhali came to Persepolis with "a band of thugs" and gave an angry speech demanding that "the faithful torch the silk-lined tent city and the grandstand that the Shah had built," but was driven off by stone-throwing local residents.

Hassan Nasrallah, the puppet:
Iranian leaders are arab, islamic republic is founded by arabs, and this system will stay like this forever. The puppet is dreaming, not knowing even the mongol empire disappeared.

 
It is only 'truth' you because you shares his anti-nationalist outlook.
let's see how you answer this:

the fabricated inscriptions:
0_2.jpg

0_5.jpg

9.jpg



every time the line reaches to a hole or damage on the stone (which are the result of thousands of years), the inscription has jumped, which means it has been added later.
your Zionist masters wanted to make sure you wont miss a single holy word.:lol:

Building of Cyrus palace in Pasargad during Reza shah era!
bare land:
95944_957.jpg

from another angle:
95945_481.jpg

start of project, creating a wall around it, to hide it before the unveiling:
95946_175.jpg

the previous angle, this time with our new king's palace:
95947_509.jpg

the mid work, notice the brand new base of the columns:
95948_159.jpg

further development:
95949_949.jpg

end of the project, our king's palace is ready:
95950_440.jpg

today:
95951_415.jpg


http://sokhanonline.ir/fa/news/60875/کاخ-کوروش-در-پاسارگاد-در-سال-1343-ساخته-شده-استاعلام-جرم-به-دانشگاه-های-آمریکایی
 
Nader Ghazipur: Violent conservative pan-turkist element who has become parliament member, supported by islamic republic, attacking Iranians and punching journalist. Directly in defence of attacking the journalist, he accuses the journalist of being against islam and "velayate faghih". Then he punches the journalist.
He also compared women to donkeys.

 
Last edited:
let's see how you answer this:

the fabricated inscriptions:
0_2.jpg

0_5.jpg

9.jpg



every time the line reaches to a hole or damage on the stone (which are the result of thousands of years), the inscription has jumped, which means it has been added later.
your Zionist masters wanted to make sure you wont miss a single holy word.:lol:

Building of Cyrus palace in Pasargad during Reza shah era!
bare land:
95944_957.jpg

from another angle:
95945_481.jpg

start of project, creating a wall around it, to hide it before the unveiling:
95946_175.jpg

the previous angle, this time with our new king's palace:
95947_509.jpg

the mid work, notice the brand new base of the columns:
95948_159.jpg

further development:
95949_949.jpg

end of the project, our king's palace is ready:
95950_440.jpg

today:
95951_415.jpg


http://sokhanonline.ir/fa/news/60875/کاخ-کوروش-در-پاسارگاد-در-سال-1343-ساخته-شده-استاعلام-جرم-به-دانشگاه-های-آمریکایی

Not sure if you are serious.

First of all, that inscription looks like the Behistun inscription. It has been damaged by British soldiers who used this site to as a target practice for their shooting skills when they were occupying Iran.

BehistunInscriptiondetail.jpg


Moreover, who supposedly made that inscription and for which purpose?

Those other pictures look photoshopped. When were they supposedly taken? There isn't any serious archeologist who agrees with these claims.

Also, that red point being supposedly the king's palace is untrue. That is not Cyrus' tomb, but the Prison of Solomon.

https://www.tripadvisor.nl/Location...353225-Pasargadae-Pasargad_Fars_Province.html

And Cyrus' used to have pillars next to his tomb as well, but they were removed for unclear reasons.

Pasargadae-08.jpg


Pasargadae-01.jpg


And this is an illustration by the German traveller Albrecht von Mandelslo when he visited the tomb in the 17th century. I'll guess he invented the palace as well, like dozen other historical figures who mention the site.

Dne5LFF.jpg


Your 'Zionist ' obsession is laughable. People like you are truly stupid.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if you are serious.

First of all, that inscription looks like the Behistun inscription. It has been damaged by British soldiers who used this site to as a target practice for their shooting skills when they were occupying Iran.

BehistunInscriptiondetail.jpg


Moreover, who supposedly made that inscription and for which purpose?

Those other pictures look photoshopped. When were they supposedly taken? There isn't any serious archeologist who agrees with these claims.

Also, that red point being supposedly the king's palace is untrue. That is not Cyrus' tomb, but the Prison of Solomon.

https://www.tripadvisor.nl/Location...353225-Pasargadae-Pasargad_Fars_Province.html

And Cyrus' used to have pillars next to his tomb as well, but they were removed for unclear reasons.

Pasargadae-08.jpg


Pasargadae-01.jpg


And your 'Zionist ' obsession is laughable.
haha, yeah, photoshopped, the whole place is a photoshop.

That red point is an index to know that place is the same, but you intentionally ignored the whole palace.
 
Reaction of Dariush Arjmand towards formation of Turkic coalition within parliament of Islamic republic!
Critics, see the emergence of the faction as a threat to Iran’s national unity, saying that it highlights ethnocentrism.

Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/ori...-speakers-azeri-pezeshkian.html#ixzz4atPv6gFZ


http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/ori...faction-turkic-speakers-azeri-pezeshkian.html

Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani angry about people visiting tomb of Cyrus the great:

I am amazed that these people get together around the Tomb of Cyrus, shouting the same slogans for him that we shout in support of the supreme leader, and yet we are sitting here, alive and well, and just watching this.” Ayatollah Nouri-Hamedani then concluded, “Who in power has been so negligent to allow these people to gather? We are in a revolutionary and Islamic country, and this revolution is the continuation of the actions of the prophet and the imams, and their point was to create a perfect populace.”

On Oct. 31, the day after Nouri-Hamedani's statement, Ali Salehi, the prosecutor in Fars province, announced the arrest of the organizers behind the gathering in Pasargadae. He said, “These people have already been under surveillance by the intelligence agencies and the police. After sufficient investigation, the leaders and main actors of these events who had started shouting the abnormal and offensive slogans were arrested.”

Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/11/iran-cyrus-day-commemoration-nouri-hamedani-protest.html#ixzz4atRxIRpZ

Ali Akbar Salehi, spreading false information to please turks: 40% of Iranians speak Turkish.

 
Egyptians are not arabs, arabism was imposed upon them by Nasser, with its failed devestating arab nationalist ideology Nasserism which made whole coalitions lose wars against Israel. I've no problem with Egyptians.

In 1931, following a visit to Egypt, Syrian Arab nationalist Sati' al-Husri remarked that "[Egyptians] did not possess an Arab nationalist sentiment; did not accept that Egypt was a part of the Arab lands, and would not acknowledge that the Egyptian people were part of the Arab nation."[32] The later 1930s would become a formative period for Arab nationalism in Egypt, in large part due to efforts by Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese intellectuals.[33]

Historically, Egyptians have considered themselves as distinct from 'Arabs' and even at present rarely do they make that identification in casual contexts; il-'arab [the Arabs] as used by Egyptians refers mainly to the inhabitants of the Gulf states... Egypt has been both a leader of pan-Arabism and a site of intense resentment towards that ideology. Egyptians had to be made, often forcefully, into "Arabs" [during the Nasser era] because they did not historically identify themselves as such. Egypt was self-consciously a nation not only before pan-Arabism but also before becoming a colony of the British Empire. Its territorial continuity since ancient times, its unique history as exemplified in its pharaonic past and later on its Coptic language and culture, had already made Egypt into a nation for centuries. Egyptians saw themselves, their history, culture and language as specifically Egyptian and not "Arab."[43]

Egyptians' attachment to pan-Arabism was particularly questioned after the Six-Day War. Nasser had overplayed his hand in trying to form a pan-Arab hegemony under himself. Thousands of Egyptians had lost their lives, and the country became disillusioned with Arab politics.[12] The Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel in 1978 further fractured the Arabic-speaking countries. Nasser's successor Anwar Sadat, both through public policy and his peace initiative with Israel, revived an uncontested Egyptian orientation, unequivocally asserting that only Egypt and Egyptians were his responsibility. The terms "Arab", "Arabism," and "Arab unity" became conspicuously absent.[13]


Egyptians are Arabs bro and so were the Pharaohs and ancient Egyptians except we weren't called Arabs but we had Arab blood making us Arabs. I know you are a butt-hurt super-Aryan but I don't care. Don't presume to talk for my people when you have no clue about us. I do not presume things about Iranians, you should do the same for us.

We have a Arab nationalistic sentiment, you just choose to ignore it.


For example see the Millions of Egyptians who cried for Nasser on his funeral.
 
Egyptians are Arabs bro and so were the Pharaohs and ancient Egyptians except we weren't called Arabs but we had Arab blood making us Arabs. I know you are a butt-hurt super-Aryan but I don't care. Don't presume to talk for my people when you have no clue about us. I do not presume things about Iranians, you should do the same for us.

We have a Arab nationalistic sentiment, you just choose to ignore it.

For example see the Millions of Egyptians who cried for Nasser on his funeral.
Ok.:enjoy:
Egypt is far away from Iran to be against it or like it. I'm neutral/indifferent towards Egypt unlike some who showed butthurtism towards Iran in the start of the topic. By the way shoukran for the new theory about pharaos and ancient Egyptians.
 
Last edited:
haha, yeah, photoshopped, the whole place is a photoshop.

That red point is an index to know that place is the same, but you intentionally ignored the whole palace.

How Shah Reza is perceived today among Iranians? I think his era marked the beginning of Iranians' mass Westernization.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom