In post #6 I evoked examples of patriotic Iranians of Zoroastrian faith who are loyal to the Islamic Republic.
Time now to turn our attention to some of the traitorous elements willing to collaborate with Iran's existential enemies, that is the zio-American empire, which is in fact hostile to every sovereign nation and to every authentic religious belief system with solid historical roots.
The epitome of these subjects' betrayal against their own ancestral homeland, is their joining up to pan-Kurdish agitation, source of anti-Iranian separatism and therefore a serious threat to Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity. These moves are in line with the zionist plan for Iran's balkanization and her dismemberment into several weak, unstable "ethno"-states highly dependent for their survival on western imperial powers, which would necessarily go hand in hand with protracted civil war (similar to how Syria, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan were destroyed by the same zio-American empire).
The first illustration of this unfortunate development, a paper from March 2018 by a researcher from the University of Alabama confirms some of the points I mentioned in the opening post about these novel strands of Zoroastrianism which appear to have been engineered with the express purpose of fulfilling zio-American globalist and imperialist agendas, due in particular to their liberal, secularist, post-modernist and potentially globalist aspects (i. e. carrying the self-destructive germs of their own transcendence and dilution into the future noahide one-world unitary pseudo-religion on the drawing board of globalist elites, which the mentioned neo-Zoroastrian groups are predestined to fully embrace owing to their dogmatic and ideological characteristics).
Another point the paper demonstrates, is how one golem of the zio-American empire generates the next in a reactive dialectical manner. Following the principle of the "firebug fireman", the zio-American empire and its globalist oligarchic infrastructure proceed to design and set into motion one catalytic subversive agent, as a response to which they then give rise to an opposite agent equally engineered to serve their goals.
In this way, they advance their agenda step by step, making sure each time that action and reaction, thesis and antithesis will both remain under their exclusive, totalitarian control. Their ambition is to exert exclusivist monopoly powers over the entire spectrum of political, social, cultural, religious activism through non-stop engineering and recruitment of indigeneous agents of influence.
It is this vicious circle that the Resistance must smash by cutting off the nefarious hands of extra-regional foreign intervention.
When it comes to the specific case we set out to analyze, this modus operandi translates as follows: after terrorizing local Kurdish populations of northern Iraq using their monstrous fake "jihadist" golem known as ISIS, zio-American imperialists appear to have fabricated a liberal, postmodern, ethnicist version of Zoroastrianism antogonistic towards Islam whose purpose is to attract Kurdish Iraqis traumatized by the ISIS experience.
Hence, rather than joining the legitimate anti-imperial Resistance, that which stands up not just to the empire's multiple proxies but also to the empire itself, these Kurds will step into the next zio-American trap, one which instead of emancipating them from the overlordship of the same zio-American oligarchy responsible of unleashing ISIS upon them, will turn them into tools for never ending tensions and conflicts at the service of Isra"el" and the bloodthirsty global oligarchy. These groups are set to help increase disputes between the Kurdish regional government and the Iraqi central state in Baghdad and to assist separatist Kurdish elements in their attempts to destabilize Iran.
Oddly enough, in an exercice of baseless and rather scatty rewriting of history, the idea that the prophet Zoroaster was "Kurdish", is being cultivated within the groups under study in order to have their members dissociate themselves from the civilizational heritage they share with other Iranians and by extension with the state of Iran.
In this manner a central element of Iranian historical heritage, which normally ought to motivate Kurdish Iraqis and others from the civilizational sphere of Greater Iran to gravitate around the center of that civilization i. e. around Tehran, is being subverted and turned upside down by hostile foreign powers so as to break up and atomize the unity and cohesion of Iran, both in the enlarged cultural-civilization sense as in the territorial and nation-state sense.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...Kurd_Neo-Zoroastrianism_among_the_Iraqi_Kurds
"Zoroaster was a Kurd!": Neo-Zoroastrianism among the Iraqi Kurds
Article (PDF Available) in Iran and the Caucasus 22(1) · March 2018 with 1,456 Reads
DOI: 10.1163/1573384X-20180108
Cite this publication
Abstract
Disgusted with ISIS, some Kurds turned away from Islam following the fall of Mosul in 2014. Many became atheists, while others sought comfort in Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism, according to converts, was the “original” religion of the Kurds before they embraced Islam. In 2015, two Zoroastrian centers opened in Sulaimani, both of which are recognized by the Kurdish Regional Government in northern Iraq. Notably, neither has tried to recreate Zoroastrianism the way it is currently and has been historically practiced in Iran and South Asia. Instead, they have created their own versions of Zoroastrianism, which is nationalist, postmodern, and liberal. Kurdish Zoroastrians argue that the reason Kurds are “backward” is Islam. They seek to rectify the present situation through a Kurdish “authenticated” and “original” form of Zoroastrianism. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork at these two centers, the present article examines this new religious movement in Sulaimani, an important city in the Kurdish region of northern Iraq. It analyses the rise and distinctiveness of Kurdish Zoroastrianism looking at how Zoroastrian Kurds articulate their views on Islam, women’s rights, human rights, and Kurdish independence.
(Parts in bold highlighted by me) 
