Hi friends, I'm sorry I can not quote every single of you and state my comments to your replies. So I prefer to reply in one post because almost every post I read is the same with raising few questions regarding my original post.
First thing, not a single time in my post I wished army to take over.
I only asked for the intervention of establishment in this particular matter.
I'm sorry to those delusional minds who even today believe establishment ask for government's approval for taking every single step. Legit it is for this institution to take approval from civil government by so many of the time, it enjoy the exceptional power and take the approval with a little pressure on civil government.
Sometimes, it is need of the time like we are expecting in this case.
Additionally, my question is not army to come in front to deal with this problem. Establishment is powerful enough to sort things out behind the curtains with calling both parties to end this issue with agreeing on 'terms & conditions' for both parties.
Furtherly, so many of respected members ignore the part where I have a serious question that on one side we are giving precious lives to fight this war on terrorism and secure the soil. But on the other, Rizvi & co with similar mindsets have hijacked the whole city...... the capital city.
Lastly, for peace in a country all institutions need to work together. Right?
So I believe the policy of "check & balance" is made for all the institution of a country to keep their eyes open to see if there's any institution not doing its job properly and if not, make them do it. No?
PS: To those who think, my living in any other country other than Pakistan, takes away all the rights of me being a Pakistani and showing my concerns on national affairs,
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR MAKING ME LAUGH WITH SILLY COMMENTS.
Have a good one all.