still a difference... And a product of JV ... And produced by US not an import...
I did not say that the M256,that go into the M1s,are imported from Rheinmetall.What I said was that its origin lies with Rheinmetall,cause they are the ones who did most of the works.And if we are to go by Mr Hunnicut,the M256 is not at all much different than the original L44 except a little bit of modification to the breech block,in order to handle the increased pressure of the M829 DU rounds,with higher energetic propellants.These are not my words,I just read it in the Presido series books,written by the above mentioned dude.
i didn't mention Armata or even arjun II.
Oh man,as always you seem to have lost the drift.My comment was in reply to your earlier question which was and I quote,
"Do you know Altay is still under development ??"
All I had been trying to convey here was that,since the thread in itself is about two under development projects,so giving the example of Altay wasn't factually wrong.
And I know what you will say now - that why then we can not mention the Turkish engine program??Isn't it borderline double standard??Well,it isn't since we are comparing the projects which has entered at least their respective prototype phase,where the developers have got something to show for.But same can not be told about the engine programs of both Turkey and India.I hope I've cleared my stand to you.
can you post pics and info ? Have they been selected ? Are they indian or foriegn?
Of course I can and I will.But it will take some time because the all the information are scattered here and there and I may have to dig up different threads in different sites.So............but I will post them,may or may not post them in this particular thread,but I'll post them never the less.
Thats an invalid arguement... Also IBMS isn't just about GPS etc but rather more related to battle management... Data linking with out units , command center etc and awareness about the battlefield,UAV connectivity etc... even T-90s don't use one...
How is that invalid??I know that IBMS doesn't equals to GPS and neither did I claim any such thing,the name IBMS itself is pretty much self-explanatory.But you have to agree that real time GPS information is indeed a very important part of an IBMS,and without it the system won't be complete.
Besides,the much needed satcom is also not online yet,because the dedicated com sats for the Army hasn't yet been placed in the orbit.But thanks to China,Pakistan Army does not need its own sats,since you can always buy the service from the former,which is not the case for us.
Then there is the problem of that the Super Vision series of AESA SAR sensors,meants for our MALE UAVs have taken longer longer that expected and the prototypes are now going through development trials and won't become operational at least before 3 years.
And lastly,the Indian Army has been terribly slow when it comes to banking upon the recent technological breakthroughs,made in country and only recently has awaken from its slumber.
Also can you kindly post a link of your "IBMS"?
I'll see to it.But to be honest,
@Abingdonboy has got much more knowledge in this regard compared to me.
Cummins india isn't an indian company nor does it produce tank engines... They produce industrial engines,automobile,etc... Also just because cummins produces civilian engines in other countries doesn't make it an indian company... Cummins is also producing similiar stuff in several other countries including China... It's called outsourcing... Tata manufactures cummins engines (non military stuff)...
I know,and I never claimed it to be an Indian company.I just said,they were developing a 1500 bhp engine in India,with Kirloskar group.
but we need a light MBT as russian or western climatic and terrain conditions are totally diffrent to the climatic conditions and terrain of indian sub continent .... am i wrong
Of course not.But you should have put forward your arguments in more clear terms.Then there wouldn't have been the confusion.
And that's why I'm saying that Russian tanks,which are built to operate in the cold climates,over European plain-lands,may not be suitable for the hot desert regions of western India.
we need something which is compact , lighter , agile , furgal yet very stronglli protected and the onli way for that is a 5 or 6 wheeled chassis with much better suspension engine and gearbox than current T-72s we have
Yes,for the north east.But same things should not be used in the western sectors,because there are no natural restrictions like weight limits on roads due to loose soil and all.There,you can and should use heavier,more heavily armored tanks............at least in my opinion.
yes im no defnce expert but im a hub bul watan hindustani and thats what matters most ... good day ... cheers mate
Of course you are and neither I'm an automobile or Material science expert but still,there is no harm in collecting a little bit of relevant info...............especially on a subject which we love to discuss.
sirji i dont know but if you understand hindi they say "AGAR SAMNE WALLE KA MU LAL HO TO HUM APNA MU THAPPAR MAAR KE LAL NAHI KERTE" MEANING IF YOUR OPPONENT HAS A RED FACE YOU DONT SLAP YOUR FACE TO MAKE IT RED
Arey yaara,life mein teen cheeso ki badi kami hain - Entertainment,Entertainment aur Entertainment.And he's got a great entertainment value.