What's new

Are Indians Islamophobic?

Are Indians Islamophobic?

  • Yes

    Votes: 34 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 34 50.0%

  • Total voters
    68
Status
Not open for further replies.
The fight is actually over land-ownership.

The parties are mainly Jews and Muslims and somewhat Christians as Israel has their holy sites. Palestinians aren't the only ethnicity in this world debarred from the land they lived for millenniums. So, why people try to impose their own selective version of human rights or human suffering on Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians or atheists etc.
 
.
Obviously. Indian muslims hatred for Islam and Muslims isn't hidden from anyone. Most of the Bharatis here are BJP supporters. So their dislike and hate for Islam is obvious and blatant. They hate Muslims of India, Pakistan, BD,Saudi Arabia. In fact from very place and region.

There are some others who are more Islamopphobe than others. @Contrarian is one such example.

Another pious saint from across the border.

Well most of the Bharatis r BJP supporters,where did u get this loads of BS,first u answer this. What about Pakistan & Pakistanis.

Even the Americans hate Saudis after 9/11. What about other countries who hate Muslims. Why are u pointing a finger towards India always.

What about the Anti Indian ppl from across the Indian Punjab border.
 
.
a few good hearted nations have also banned Non muslims to eat / drink water outside during ramzan !

They can technically eat/drink, but not in public.

I don't see how this is related to the question. How does banning fasting improve security?

The parties are mainly Jews and Muslims and somewhat Christians as Israel has their holy sites. Palestinians aren't the only ethnicity in this world debarred from the land they lived for millenniums. So, why people try to impose their own selective version of human rights or human suffering on Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians or atheists etc.

I really don't have an answer to that. All I know is that it hurts progress.
 
.
China is a non religious communist country. So it is alright.
 
.
They can technically eat/drink, but not in public.

I don't see how this is related to the question. How does banning fasting improve security?



I really don't have an answer to that. All I know is that it hurts progress.

what technicality .. both are violation of human/religious rights! and extreme in its own way..

The parties are mainly Jews and Muslims and somewhat Christians as Israel has their holy sites. Palestinians aren't the only ethnicity in this world debarred from the land they lived for millenniums. So, why people try to impose their own selective version of human rights or human suffering on Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians or atheists etc.
i dont think palestinians are any different from rest of Arab specially neighboring Jordans and Egyptians !
 
.
what technicality .. both are violation of human/religious rights! and extreme in its own way..

They can eat, but not out in the public. And that includes smoking. For instance, when I'm not fasting during Ramadan, I cannot eat/drink/smoke in public. It is a matter of cultural sensitivity and respect for the folks who are fasting. Do you now understand?

But anyhow, if you are going into the "holier than thou" territory, you're on your own. My question was pretty clear for the record. And if you don't know it, no need to reply.
 
.
Even all terrorists in China are all actually Uighur, and always muslims, maybe all your guys never believe that, in all China media, the word 'Uighur' are avoided to be mentioned, meanwhile, the word 'muslim' are not allowed to mention.
Always, the China media always say that terrorists are specific, case by case, neither Uighur, nor muslims are the problems. The public have to derive the ethnic identity from the suspects' names.
No matter how China gov. and media try their best to separate terrorists and Uighur, Muslims, always somebody in this world accused that China oppressed the minority, the religion!
Muslims are not innocent in China though, there are a lot of terrorists. You can read up on uighur terrorism in wiki for more info.
 
.
Of course Indians are Islamophobic. Any religionist fearful for the existence of his religion becomes phobic to the pressure exerted by the foreign religion which seeks to replace it. The Umayyad, Ghaznavid, the Mongol and the Tughlaq conquest of the sub-continent have been forgotten to time but their historic accounts remain pristine and accessible, although to some extent apocryphal, for those who wish to seek out the historical development of religion in the sub-continent. Read and expand your mind:

The Magnitude of Muslim Atrocities

Although the piece linked above is essentially the work of a Hindu hard-liner and his account of what happened is most certainly tainted with bias, the piece itself is not very far from the truth.

These conquests, and the most recent partition of India where Muslims carved out a piece of the land for their own use and welfare, has resulted in a deep-seeded hatred for Islam and its practitioners. Although you will find a majority of Hindus unwilling to accept this, perhaps in turn averring that their feelings towards Islam are of indifference and nonchalance, the truth is that Hindus will never be approving of the Islamic ideology and will always harbour feelings of disdain for it. These feelings are multiplied manifold when Hindu nationalism is taken into account.

There have been many recorded instances of internal violence against the resident Muslim population in India such as Bihar (1946), Nellie (1983), Gujarat (2002), Ayodhya (1992), Assam (2012), Bhiwandi (1984) and Meerut (1987). These violent outbreaks, although arguably provocations by the Muslim community, are essentially a manifestation of the resentment and ire which Hindus hold against the injustice wreaked by the Muslims in the middle-ages and the partition which was brokered by colonial Britain.

Hindus are most certainly Islamophobic and a large majority of them will always conceal their dislike for Islam and its followers, with the exception of online-forums such as this, in order to appear pluralistic and secular.
 
Last edited:
.
Alot of indians on Internet are. Definitely. Not Islamophobic, but straight out bigoted anti-Muslim hate crowd who 'enjoys' the decimation of Muslims. Nazi behavior.
 
.
are you sure?
hindus have been under muslim rule for over 800 years...


ethnic genocide of kashmiri pandits? I've been hearing a lot about it can we have some more information on it...
actually your ancestors come into that account. ..
 
.
They can eat, but not out in the public. And that includes smoking. For instance, when I'm not fasting during Ramadan, I cannot eat/drink/smoke in public. It is a matter of cultural sensitivity and respect for the folks who are fasting. Do you now understand?

But anyhow, if you are going into the "holier than thou" territory, you're on your own. My question was pretty clear for the record. And if you don't know it, no need to reply.

wow! Gaining respect by punishment ! u are making as if keeping roza is some sort of punishment for Muslims and by looking at non muslim eating and smoking they will be tempted to break the roza.
 
.
10532465_749327631798870_6466362973325644207_n.jpg


nuff said
 
.
wow! Gaining respect by punishment ! u are making as if keeping roza is some sort of punishment for Muslims and by looking at non muslim eating and smoking they will be tempted to break the roza.

You fail to understand the point, other than engaging in needless back-biting.

No one is going to stop you from eating in a restaurant during Ramadan.
 
.
I don't think so but to each his own .
 
.
You fail to understand the point, other than engaging in needless back-biting.

No one is going to stop you from eating in a restaurant during Ramadan.
lol try that in KSA!
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom