What's new

An Important question to all Chinese

More than 100 nuclear reactors by 2020.

Is that fast enough, or is it still too slow?:lol:

The nation has 13 generators in commercial operation while 28 are being built, the Ministry of Environmental Protection said in June. China may have more than 100 atomic reactors by 2020, it said.

China Connects First Fast Nuclear Reactor to Electricity Grid - Bloomberg

China has ambitious plans to have more than 100 reactors operating by 2020 to help curb surging demand for coal and imported oil and gas. But development was suspended after Japan's March 2011 tsunami crippled the Fukushima power plant, causing the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986.

Authorities launched an inspection of China's 13 operating reactors following the Fukushima disaster and said they found no problems. They said they were reviewing work on the 28 reactors under construction.

China nuclear company plans IPO to fund expansion

ChinaNuclearPowerPlants.jpg
 
Indeed this is great achievement by China. It was very difficult to progress the country which have 1+ billion population. This is The economic miracle.


It is with the help of the West this rise occurred. Many large western corporations and companies exported their factories and jobs to China giving hundreds of millions of Chinese opportunities to work and gradually improve their lives. Of course, Chinese work ethic is great but the mass transfer of factories and manufacturing jobs is what triggered this. In other words Western capitalism has helped build China up. The same West, that China is now economically threatening...

The US has achieved some significant benefits by exporting these low-skilled labor jobs to China, and that is it has made US workers more prone to high-skilled jobs and professions, now that workers here are more encouraged to push themselves further to compete in a more highly skilled job market.



In addition, most jobs the U. S. lost to China are low-skilled jobs. By outsourcing those low-skilled jobs to China, Americans have actually become more competitive in high-skilled jobs such as management, innovation and marketing. The low-skilled jobs also serve China well as Chinese rural migrants have opportunities to move up in life and gain some skills.
The results are mutually beneficial. On one side of the globe, hundreds of millions of Chinese rural migrant workers earn more and have a higher standard of living; their children have more training, which leads to more growth. On the other side of the globe, Western consumers are able to afford goods at lower prices and enjoy lower inflation.

The Myth Of China's Manufacturing Power - Forbes



As far as China building 70 airports in three years, that's great US has done all that decades ago. US has hundreds of developed and modern cities and hundreds of more airports, it doesn't have to build airports rapidly as the demand isn't there as it is in China.
 
Is (was)China a nation full of scientific endevors?

Read Joseph Needham‘s epic “Science and Civilisation in China”:

Science and Civilisation in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The notion of China being a “copycat” has been blown up out of all proportion by the western media,mainly for egotistical reasons and ulterior motives。

Even if there are some elements of truth in the accusation,“copycatting”,which is totally different from theft, is a worthy cause if it allows you to catch up in the shortest time possible。Only fools would do otherwise。

Once China is sufficiently “rich”,it would be back to the old self of being the most innovative nation on this planet。
 
8% plus real growth and 12% plus nominal growth are assured for the next 20 years - China has a long way to go before it realizes its full potential:

China Needs To Spend(Invest is a better word:azn:) Almost $8 Trillion To Cope With Massive Migration Of Rural Peoples Into Cities

By Palash R. Ghosh: Subscribe to Palash's RSS feed

August 15, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

China needs to spend £5 trillion ($7.8 trillion) over the next two decades as an additional 200 million people are expected to move into the urban centers of the country, a new government report warned.

There are already up to 300 million migrant workers who have taken up residence (often illegally) in China’s metropolises.

There are already up to 300 million migrant workers who have taken up residence (often illegally) in China’s metropolises. Many of these arrivals live in substandard housing and toil at low-paying, menial jobs.

The report, entitled “Blue Book of Cities in China” and released by the Chinese Academy of Social Science's Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies, underlines the massive problems China faces as its population rapidly urbanizes.

Shan Jingjing, a researcher from the Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies, or IUE, told the Daily Telegraph newspaper of Britain that a gargantuan amount of money will be required to provide housing, social welfare and infrastructure projects for the new migrants.

"The rural population currently working in the cities has not turned into an urban population yet,” he said. “They don't have the same social insurance, housing, education, public service and citizen rights as urban residents."

The urbanization of China has been an extraordinary, perhaps unprecedented, phenomenon.

In 1949, when the Communists seized power in the country, 90 percent of the populace lived on farms and rural regions. As recently as 1982, only about one-fourth of the people lived in cities.

Now, the urban population has exceeded that of the rural for the first time in China’s history.

Dr. Peter Liotta, a professor of political science at Salve Regina University in Newport, R.I., says the urban portion of the population will continue to climb in tandem with economic growth.

“In the next decade, 70 percent of the China's population will live in cities,” he said.

“By 2030, China will have 221 cities with populations exceeding 1 million residents each, and its total urban population will add 400 million new residents -- more than the entire population of the United States then.”

Liotta noted that Chinese authorities have prepared well for the oncoming crush in its cities.

“China has been thinking strategically about how to handle this astounding increase in population and its accompanying need for capacity resilience and infrastructure support,” he noted.

“China has specific plans for building metro systems, highways and high-speed trains for its top 170 cities. In Beijing, for example, from 2004 to 2006 alone, spending on urban transportation increased over 50 percent. So, for these 170 ‘top’ Chinese cities that are a strategic priority, China will need 28,000 kilometers [17,000 miles] of metro rail lines and 5 billion square meters of paved road -- and it is likely that China will achieve these goals.”

Still, China faces some huge challenges.

Liotta indicated that China now has five mega-cities: Chengdu (approaching 35 million residents), Chongqing, Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzen. Many of these cities are new creations.

“The mega-city of Shenzhen in southeastern China (across the straits from Hong Kong), for example, did not even exist prior to 1979 except as a simple fishing village,” he said.

“Today, its population is 14 million. The movement of peasant populations from the west to the mega-cities of eastern China represents the largest -- and most rapid -- migration in human history.”

China Needs To Spend Almost $8 Trillion To Cope With Massive Migration Of Rural Peoples Into Cities - International Business Times
 
And all these development is through western science and technology ..
 
China will be No. 1 in economy in the near future. That is for sure.

I have never doubted China's greatness. Chinese people has unlimited potentials. The only thing we need pay attention to is that we do not get some bad leaders again.

What would you thought of China being in it's present day situation if you were alive in the 1970s ? Would have you dissmised the notion of China being a Superpower or the second largest economy? Where do you China is heading in the future? Powerful and full of scientific endevors?
 
And all these development is through western science and technology ..

I needed to laugh at this...There is no such thing as WESTERN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY....Science and Tech are a language and skill...it can't be assigned to an area....Gravity is not significantly different (yes needed to add significant because 1 would point to me the point difference between gravity at the poles and the equator)...Gravity is gravity...I have yet to see a country defying that law...and I have yet to see someone saying WESTERN GRAVITY :azn:

Besides what made you write that?

It's like saying Indian Hinduism and Chinese Buddhism which are religions and are practised elsewhere in the world too....so assigning them to a country just sounds silly....

This is just pure comparison please don't give me obsessive bombardment about stuff!
 
I would just ignore the Indian troll. He's incorrect.

China followed in the footsteps of Western science and technology. However, China had to research and develop the technology on its own. That's why it took thirty years. That is an important difference.

For example, a Chinese genius had to develop China's 3.3-megaton thermonuclear bomb in 1967. No Western countries helped in China's thermonuclear program.

This is in sharp contrast to the hordes of Russian scientists currently building India's "indigenous" submarine, GSLV rocket, etc.
 
The Freedom tower is near completion, the reason for the long delays was due to the complex legal problems before building or construction could begin on the site. Other aspects like the master design of the building also weighed in...

Indeed it took a long time to rebuild the World Trade Center because over argument on design and so on. I was there in New York back in 2010 and I couldn't see anything behind the tall covered fence. Now its almost done. The Pentagon took a year to repair the damage from the 9/11 attacks.

Anyways you should have seen how New York was prior to the Industrial Age to the 1920s and 30s.

NYC_Top_of_the_Rock_Pano.jpg
 
A big difference between 1970 and now. Then in 1970 majority of overseas Chinese were pro-ROC in Taiwan, now pratically all are pro-Mainland China, but treat Taiwan as part of Greater China and friendly to both.

Nobody foresee today's China economic and military might, some even expected the backward China to struggle in poverty in their lifetime, or even collapse under Taiwan's military assault to recapture the Mainland.

Economically, during the first few years of China opening out Shenzhen, Chinese from Hongkong and other overseas Chinese pour in huge money and business expertise to kick start economic reform in Southern China. Taiwanese investors came in few years later. When the West realised there is a big cake in China, they joined in after some hesitation, and only after then that they start to move their production facilities in order to undercut their competitors in US and Europe.
 
And all these development is through western science and technology ..

It was for Japan and will be for India. I don't see your point. India isn't leading in any scientific field. Despite being communist and state-backed, the Chinese are actually comparable to the West in certain scientific fields.

The same can't be said of poverty-stricken cow worshipers.
 
Shanghai 1990 vs 2010.

shanghaibeforeandafter1.jpg


The US, on the other hand, can't even rebuild the One World Trade Center for the ten year anniversary of 9/11.




China deserves a place in the world, as a rich and powerful nation, like it had in the past until 18 century. Congratulation China!
I just hope China respects and lives peaceful with all of its neighbors, so we all can enjoy the fruits of freedom and economic success.

Personally I prefer the old Shanghai. The new Shanghai looks modern but boring (sorry!) like any other modern city in the world. The people in Vietnam love the old Shanghai. There is a famous Chinese/Vietnamese song about the city.

BEN THUONG HAI.flv - YouTube
 
Back
Top Bottom